Study of the phenomenon of plant blindness using an online survey of residents in St. Petersburg
The phenomenon of “plant blindness”, the inability of people to perceive and appreciate plants in the environment, remains a serious problem for biosphere education and biodiversity conservation. As part of the study, an online survey was conducted among 253 respondents in St. Petersburg to determine the level of knowledge and attitudes towards plants. Overall, we found that people do notice plants less than animals, and also notice and distinguish brighter plants, which is in line with the results of international studies. For all respondents, the aesthetic and ecological significance of the plant world is important, but interest in it does not increase the likelihood of interest in and the ability to distinguish plants, thus there is a gap between awareness of environmental issues and willingness to act. Key findings showed that a significant proportion of respondents only visit city parks, avoiding protected natural areas, which limits contact with rare and endemic plants, which, in turn, reduces the likelihood of distinguishing plants in the wild. Awareness of rare plants remains low overall. Plant blindness may depend on the educational profile, interest in nature (thus, professions closer to interaction with nature demonstrated greater awareness of plant problems and attention to them). Respondents wanted to know more about plants from all possible sources. The study emphasizes the need to strengthen the role of botanical gardens in educational programs, as well as the importance of early interaction with nature in the formation of environmental awareness. The authors propose a comprehensive approach, including popularization of knowledge through the media, structured educational programs and active involvement of the public in the conservation of biodiversity. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
environmental knowledge,
cognitive errors,
environmental sociology,
sustainable developmentAuthors
| Ermolaeva Yulia V. | Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences | mistelfrayard@mail.ru |
| Zolina Anastasia A. | Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences | azolina@binran.ru |
| Varganova Irina V. | N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources | i.varganova@vir.nw.ru |
Всего: 3
References
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [Online] Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/en (Accessed: 3rd October 2024).
Allen, W. (2003) Plant Blindness. BioScience. 53(10). pp. 926-926. [0926:PB]2.0.CO;2.
Stagg, B.C., Hetherington, L. & Dillon, J. (2024) Towards a model of plant awareness in education: a literature review and framework proposal.International Journal of Science Education. 47(4). pp. 539-559.
Blue, S., Hargiss, C.L.M., Norland, J.E., DeKeyser, E.S. & Comeau, P. (2023) Plant blindness represents the loss of generational knowledge and cultural identity. Natural Sciences Education. 51(1). e20106.
Bobo-Pinilla, J., Marcos-Walias, J., Iglesias, J.D. & Tapia, R.R. (2023) Overcoming plant blindness: are the future teachers ready? Journal of Biological Education. 58(11). pp. 1-15.
Norretranders, T. (1998) The User Illusion: Cutting Consciousness Down to Size. Viking.
Thomas, H., Ougham, H. & Sanders, D.L. (2021) Plant blindness and sustainability.International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 23(1). pp. 41-57.
Parsley, K.M. (2020) Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET. 2(6). pp. 598-601.
Kubiatko, M., Fancovicova, J. & Prokop, P. (2021) Factual knowledge of students about plants is associated with attitudes and interest in botany.International Journal of Science Education. 43(9). pp. 1426-1440.
Wandersee, J.H. & Schussler, E.E. (1999) Preventing Plant Blindness. The American Biology Teacher. 61(2). pp. 82-86.
Achurra, A. (2022) Plant blindness: A focus on its biological basis. Frontiers in Education. 7. 963448.
Margulies, J.D., Bullough, L.-A., Hinsley, A., Ingram, D.J., Cowell, C.R., Goettsch, B., Klitgard, B.B., Lavorgna, A., Sinovas, P. & Phelps, J. (2019) Illegal wildlife trade and the persistence of "plant blindness". Plants, People, Planet. 1(3). pp. 173-182.
Zani, G. & Low, J. (2022) Botanical priming helps overcome plant blindness on a memory task. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 81. 101808.
Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Song, Z. & Lew, A.A. (2019) Assessment bias of environmental quality (AEQ), consideration of future consequences (CFC), and environmentally responsible behavior (ERB) in tourismю Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 27. pp. 609-628.
Amprazis, A. & Papadopoulou, P. (2020) Plant blindness: a faddish research interest or a substantive impediment to achieve sustainable development goals? Environmental Education Research. 26. pp. 1065-1087.
Pedrera, O., Ortega, U., Ruiz-Gonzalez, A., Diez, J.R. & Barrutia, O. (2021) Branches of plant blindness and their relationship with biodiversity conceptualisation among secondary students. Journal of Biological Education. 57. pp. 566-591.
Waylen, K.A. (2006) Botanic Gardens: Using Biodiversity to improve human well-being. Medicinal Plant Conservation. 12. 4-8. Ref. 25.
Lavrova, T.V. & Romanova, E.S. (2019) Possibilities of the Botanical Garden of Moscow State University in Support of Ecological and Botanical Education at Schools. Biology in School. 6. pp. 47-55.
Musinova, L.P., Kalugin, Yu.G. & Mitina, E.G. (2020) Excursion as an Organization Form of Educational Activities in Peter the Great Botanical Garden of Komarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences. Samara Journal of Science. 9(1(30). pp. 259-267.
Erhabor, N. (2018) Developing Leaders Through Mentoring in Environmental Education. Electronic Green Journal. 1(41).
Kahtz, A.W. (1995) Impact of Environmental Education Classes at Missouri Botanical Garden on Attitude and Knowledge Change of Elementary School Children. HortTechnology Horttech. 5(4). pp. 338-340.
Jose, S., Wu, C. & Kamoun, S. (2019) Overcoming plant blindness in science, education, and society. Plants, People, Planet. 1. pp. 169-172.
Balding, M. & William, K.J.H. (2016) Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conservation Biology. 30(6). pp. 1192-1199.
Barrable, A., Friedman, S. & Beloyianni, V. (2024) Nature connection in adulthood: The role of childhood nature experiences. People and Nature. 6(4). pp. 1571-1580. 10.1002/pan3. 10657.
Aota, Y. & Soga, M. (2024) Both frequency and diversity of childhood nature experiences are associated with self-reported pro-biodiversity behaviours in adulthood. People and Nature. 6(2). pp. 792-799.
Yanniris, C., Gavrilakis, C. & Hoover, M.L. (2023) Direct Experience of Nature as a Predictor of Environmentally Responsible Behaviors. Forests. 14(11), 2233.
Stehl, P., White, M. P., Vitale, V., Pahl, S., Elliott, L.R., Fian L. & Bosch M. van den (2024) From childhood blue space exposure to adult environmentalism: The role of nature connectedness and nature contact. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 93. 102225.
Adamo, M., Sousa, R., Wipf, S., Correia, R. A., Lumia, A., Mucciarelli, M. & Mammola, S. (2022) Dimension and impact of biases in funding for species and habitat conservation. Biological Conservation. 272. 109636.
Falk, D.A. (1992) From Conservation Biology to Conservation Practice: Strategies for Protecting Plant Diversity. In: Fiedler, P. L. & Jain, S. K. (eds) Conservation Biology. Boston. pp. 397-431.
Arendt, F. & Matthes, J. (2014) Nature Documentaries, Connectedness to Nature, and Pro-environmental Behavior. Environmental Communication. 10. pp. 1-20.
Doyle, G. (2022) In the garden: capacities that contribute to community groups establishing community gardens.International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 14(1). pp. 15-32.
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X. & Matthies, D. (2010) The influence of plant diversity on people's perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biological Conservation. 143(1). pp. 195-202.
Niigaaniin, M. & MacNeill, T. (2022) Indigenous culture and nature relatedness: Results from a collaborative study. Environmental Development. 44. 100753.
