On impossibility and necessity to speak about evil
In article the contradiction between abstention from ethical judgments in postmetaphysical European continental philosophy of the XX-th century and monstrous crimes in the European history of the same time is considered. The hypothesis on relevance of Kant distinction between the person as purpose and thing as means for understanding of nature of evil in postmetaphysical epoch is analyzed.
Download file
Counter downloads: 162
Keywords
невозможность этики, зло, лицо, вещь, убийство, impossibility of ethics, evil, the person, a thing, murderAuthors
Name | Organization | |
Krechetova M.Y. | mkrechet@mail.ru |
References
Арендт Х. Банальность зла. Эйхман в Иерусалиме. М.: Европа, 2008.
Кант И. Основоположение к метафизике нравов // Кант И. Сочинения: В 4 т. на нем. и рус. яз. М.: Московский философский фонд, 1997.
Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время. М.: Ad Marginem, 1997.
Гегель Г.В.Ф. Лекции по истории философии. Книга первая. СПб.: Наука, 1993.
