On the question of the relationship between interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in scientific knowledge | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2013. № 4 (24).

On the question of the relationship between interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in scientific knowledge

This article covers the role of the concepts of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the new stage of development of science associated with the development of nonlinear natural science after the cognitive revolution, and with new discoveries such as the programs of unitary gauge theories, the general scientific research program, the introduction of the concept of post-non-classical science with such characteristics as changing nature of scientific reality due to computerization, and considering the object of science as a complex, self-sustaining system. One of the essential characteristics of the post-non-classical science is interdisciplinarity. At present the problem of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity draws the attention of scientific communities and schools, but the use of these concepts, especially transdis-ciplinarity, has not been clarified yet, which is why the article analyzes the existing perspectives and approaches to these concepts and presents the author's approach. Interdisciplinarity is the interaction between the systems of disciplinary knowledge, which manifests itself as the transfer of the principles of one science to another. Often this transfer, also metaphorically called "paradigmatic vaccination", results in the use of the language and categorical instrument of one science to interpret the facts of another. The so-called "paradigmatic vaccination" can call forth criticism, and the creation of interdisciplinary design projects, when the disciplinary science becomes a "problem-oriented". Transdiscipli-narity, as a new type of production and integration of scientific knowledge, is characterized by common research programs, cognitive schemes which work in the new system of new objects of cognition and activity. Transdisciplinarity, along with the physical, chemical, biological, psychological, technical components, also includes the social, liveral components of transdisciplinary integration. The development of transdisciplinarity entails the need for a transdisciplinary conceptual tool of integration where the classical language of description, based on the concepts of mass, energy, spatial relationships, has to be supplemented with the language of socio-humanistic descriptions, based on the concepts of needs, goals, ideals, interest, responsibility, duty, etc. Transdisciplinarity thus involves the study and implementation of a problem on several levels, for example, the physical and the mental, the global and the local.

Download file
Counter downloads: 618

Keywords

междисциплинарные исследования, трансдисциплинарность, редукционизм, синергетика, reductionism, synergetics, transdisciplinary, interdisciplinary studies

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Moiseeva A.P.Tomsk Polytechnic Universityapm_tpu@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Transdisiplinarity: Basarab Nicolescu Talks with Russ Yolckmann // INTEGRAL REVIEW. 2007. P.77.
Междисциплинарность в науках и философии. М.: ИФРАН, 2010. 202 c.
Степин В.С. Философия науки. Общие проблемы. М.: Гардарики, 2007. 382 с.
Степин В.С. История и философия науки. М.: Академический проект. Трикста, 2011. 423 c.
Тульчинский Г.Л. Проективный философский словарь: Новые термины и понятия. СПб.: Алетея, 2003. 432 с.
Мирский Э.М. Междисциплинарные исследования // Новая философская энциклопедия. М.: Мысль, 2001. Т. 2. 428 c.
Касавин И.Т. Социальные ракусы междисциплинарности // Междисциплинарность в науках и философии. М.: ИФРАН, 2010. 202 с.
Микешина Л.А. Диалог когнитивных практик. Из истории эпистемологии и философии науки. М.: РОССПЭН, 2010. 567 c.
Дридзе Т.М. На пороге экоантропоцентрической социологии // Общественные науки и современность. 1994. № 4. С. 95-98.
Лекторский В.А. Возможна ли интеграция естественных наук и наук о человеке? // Вопросы философии. 2004. №3. С. 44-49.
Буданов В.Г. Трансдисциплинарное образование в ХХ1 веке. Проблемы становления. [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://www.gumer.info/filosfak.ru/biblio (дата обращения: 25.12. 2012).
Морен Э. Метод. Природа природы. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2005. 457 с.
International Center for Transdisciplinary Research and Studies // The site of Centre International de Recherches et Etudes Transdisciplinaires (CIRET). [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/index_en.php (дата обращения: 5.11.2
Mittlstrass J. Interdisziplinaritat oder Transdisziplinaritat? - Ein Symposium an der Univer-sitat Hannover uber die Chancen des Wissenschaftsbetriebs der Zukunft(21./22. November 1991). Munich-Vienna, 1993. P. 45-61.
Киященко Л.П., Гребенщикова У.Г. Современная философия науки: трансдисциплинарные аспекты. М.: МГМСУ, 2011. 172 с.
Конвергенция биологических, информационных, нано- и когнитивных технологий: вызов философии (материалы круглого стола) // Вопросы философии. 2012. №12. C. 3-23.
Князева Е.Н., Курдюмов С.П. Основания синергетики. Человек, конструирующий себя и свое будущее. М.: Ком Книга. 2007. 232 с.
Найссер У. Познание и реальность. М.: Прогресс, 1981. 232 с.
Агацци Э. Идея общества, основанного на знаниях // Вопросы философии. 2012. № 10. C. 3-19.
 On the question of the relationship between interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in scientific knowledge | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2013. № 4 (24).

On the question of the relationship between interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in scientific knowledge | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2013. № 4 (24).

Download file