On two interpretations of definite descriptions
The subject of the paper is the problem of interpretation of definite descriptions in sentences containing a definite description and a singular term. I argue that, in such contexts, definite descriptions can be interpreted, in the light of the Russellian analysis, in two ways: as singular terms and as individuating predicates. These interpretations demand to interpret the sentence copula as expressing the identity or the subject-predicate relation respectively. I criticize V. Surovtsev's claim that, in contexts specified, definite descriptions allow for the first interpretation only.
Download file
Counter downloads: 372
Keywords
определенная дескрипция, копула, сингулярный термин, предикат, тождество, Рассел, Суровцев, definite description, copula, singular term, predicate, identity, Russell, SurovtsevAuthors
| Name | Organization | |
| Borisov Evgeny Vasilyevich | Tomsk State University | evgeny_borisov@mail.ru |
References
Суровцев В.А. Что же желал знать Георг IV? // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2014. № 2(26). С. 190-201.
Рассел Б. Об обозначении // Язык, истина, существование. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2002. С. 7-22.
Kaplan D. Afterthoughts // Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. Themes from Kaplan. New York, Oxford, 1989. P. 565-614.
Marti G. Direct Reference and Definite Descriptions // dialectica. Vol. 62, № 1 (2008). P. 43-57.
Borisov E. How Do We Use Definite Descriptions to Express Singular Propositions? // Problemos. № 85 (2014). P. 130-140.
Kripke S. Russell's Notion of Scope // Mind. 2005. Vol. 114, № 456. P. 1005-1037.
