Basic views on the subject of logic in the European philosophy of 19 century | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2015. № 2(30).

Basic views on the subject of logic in the European philosophy of 19 century

The development of formal logic in 19 century Europe is considered in the paper. The principal idea is that that during this logic developed as three independent traditions: German, British and Austrian. The German tradition was definitely influenced by I. Kant. The (general pure) logic was considered here as a science of the form of thought, in abstraction from any object (content). J.F. Fries and J.F. Herbart proposed the most influential conceptions of the philosophy of logic. The former developed the anthropological (psychological) foundation for logic. The latter shifted the subject of logic from "thinking" to "thinkable". His presuppositions were disclosed in details in the remarkable "Neue Dar-stellung der Logic" of his pupil M.W. Drobisch. A.Trendelenburg exposed the final commonly accepted view of the subject; he also coined the very term "formal logic". The principles of the British traditions were laid down by R.Whately, and in fact that principles formed the paradigm of British tradition in the philosophy of logic. The logic was considered here as an inquiry of reasoning, and its formal character was explained by the fact that it deals with the form of language expression. Approaches of Whately were severely attacked by W. Hamilton, but his arguments, in spite of soundness, appeared to be ineffective. The development of this tradition is traced up to J.S. Mill and A. de Morgan. Mill has created the groundwork for future development of logical semantics by his theory of denotation and connotation. De Morgan has expanded the linguistic approach to logic on its algebraic handling. Both of them extended, in different ways, the conception of reasoning. B.Bolzano was the father-founder of the Austrian tradition. Logic was typically viewed here as a general theory of science (Wissensschaftslehre). Logic is formal because it deals with the form of objects and relations in general. The principal feature of the Austrian logical tradition consists in the fact that it included some kind the theory of object. It is pointed and demonstrated in the paper that the factual 'inventor' of the logical theory of object was R. Zimmerman, the student of Bolzano. The formation of the Austrian logical style was completed due to the school of Brentano. The specific features of the school are discussed on the instance of the A. Hofler's "Logik". The concluding part of the paper contains very short outline of the remarkable similarities between the ideas of Frege and principles, shared or discussed by the school of Brentano.

Download file
Counter downloads: 422

Keywords

формальная логика, Кант, Уэтли, Больцано, мышление, язык, предмет, formal logic, Kant, Whately, Bolzano, thought, language, object

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Chernoskutov Yury Yu.Saint-Petersburg state universitychernoskutov@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Кант И. Критика чистого разума // Собрание сочинений в 8 томах. М., 1994. T.3.
Кант И. Логика. Пособие к лекциям // Иммануил Кант. Трактаты. СПб.: Наука, 2006.
Fries J.F. System der Logik. Heidelberg, 1811.
Herbart J.F. Hauptpunkte der Logik // Saemmtliche Werke. Lepzig, 1850. Bd. 1.
Herbart J.F. Lehrbuch zur Einleitung in die Philosophie // Saemmtliche Werke. Lepzig, 1850. Bd. 1.
Drobisch M.W. Neue Darstellung der Logik. 3 aufl., Leipzig, 1863 (1-е изд. 1836).
Trendelenburg A. Logische Untersuchungen. 2 aufl., Leipzig, 1862.
AldrichH. Artis Logicae Compendium. Oxford, 1961.
Whately R. Elements of logic. From the 8th London ed. revised, N.Y., Harper & Brothers, 1855. 396 p.
Уэтли Р. Основания логики. СПб.: Изд. А.В. Заленскаго, 1873. 547 с.
Hamilton W. Logic. The recent English Treatises on that Science // Hamilton W. Discussions on Philosophy and Literature, Education and University reform. N.Y.: Harper & Brothers, 1861. P. 120-173.
MillJ.S. System of Logic, 8th ed. N.Y.: Harper & Brothers, 1882. 1156 p.
Милль Дж.С. Система логики, в двух томах. СПб.: Издание М.О. Вольфа, 1865. Т. 1. 553 с.
Grattan-Guinness I. The Search for Mathematical Roots, 1870-1940. Princeton UP, 2000. 690 p.
De Morgan A. Formal Logic, or the calculus of inference, necessary and probable. London: Taylor and Walton, 1847. 336 p.
Simons P. Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer AP, 1992.
Bolzano B. Wissenschaftlehre. Lpz, 1929-1931.
Больцано Б. Учение о науке. СПб., 2003.
Zimmerman R. Formale Logik (Philosophische Propadeutik fur obergymnasien. Zweite Abtheilung). Vienna, 1853.
Zimmerman R. Philosophische Propadeutik. Vienna, 1860.
Brentano F. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig, 1911.
Hofler A., Meinong A. Philosophische Propadeutik. Erster Theil: Logik. Vienna, 1890.
Chernoskutov Yu.Yu. Logic and object theory in 19th century: from Bolzano to Frege» // Logical Investigations. Moscow, 2013. V.19. P. 10-22.
 Basic views on the subject of logic in the European philosophy of 19
                   century | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2015. № 2(30).

Basic views on the subject of logic in the European philosophy of 19 century | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2015. № 2(30).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1784