To a question about the psychologism: problem of logical rule-implementation

This paper deal with the problem of relation between logic and thought in the discussion of the psychologism and antipsychologism. Based on the analysis of the conflict thesis these positions, the question is formulated on the subject of logical rules and the ultimate foundations of the logical rule-implementation. Making difference between logical law and logical rule detects a range of problematic aspects of the logical rule-implementation. Researching the problem concerning limit of free action in realization rule-implementation in perspective of the law-norm-rule, the role of subject in the rule-implementation practice, and the time factor as a necessary condition for the implementation of logical rules. The results show that the question of the relationship between objective ideal-logical content of thought and subjective really-psychological conditions for the implementation of logical rules lies beyond the boundaries of the opposition "psychologism-antipsychologism", and requires a logical-philosophical reflection.

Keywords

Authors

References