About a perfored play as a physical thing (Some remarks to the notes of Sir K. Popper) | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2016. № 2(34).

About a perfored play as a physical thing (Some remarks to the notes of Sir K. Popper)

The article studies the problem of pluralistic background of objective cognition by K. Popper. The initial point of this analysis is K.Popper's example. While watching the Shakespeare 's play "Hamlet " the philosopher used this sample in one of his public lectures " Cognition : objective and subjective " as an illustration of the physical world as physical thing. This was the reason why the play,being belonged to the world 1,was refused to be performed. K. Popper grounded not the identity of the play and it's various variantsof understanding by means of analysisof objective/subjective cognition. Meanwhile it should be emphasised that the topic of objective and subjective cognition link having a millennia hystory, within the last ten years gained new aspects and got new impulse for the development and discussion. These new aspects of vision facilitated in many ways the development of various epistemo-logical concepts,directed to the elicitation of the role and importance of such a notion as reference.The problem of the world objectivness 3 or the problem of interpretative plurality in semiotic gained the following solution. The play and it's performance and understanding, as well as a picture and its reproduction, have parasinonimical relations,which are united by means of sence. The process of transition itself is considered to be a transmutation ,determined by the changes of matter epitome of the sence field. Within this approach "death " of the text /theory as objective cognition (world 3) is impossible. But there exist transmutations , which cause the appearance of world 3'1',world 3'2', world 3'n+1'.

Download file
Counter downloads: 294

Keywords

interpretation, transmutations, subjective cognition, objective cognition, K. Popper, интерпретация, трансмутации, субъективное знание, объективное знание, К. Поппер

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Goncharenko Valentina N.The Russian presidential academy of national economy and public administration Tomsk branch Ranepaalbaregia1960@mail.ru
Goncharenko Mark V.Tomsk polytechnic university; Tomsk state universitymarkgon73@rambler.ru
Всего: 2

References

Эко У. Отсутствующая структура. СПб.: Symposium, 2006. 544 с.
Эко У. Роль читателя. СПб.: Symposium, 2005. 502 с.
Эко У. Сказать почти то же самое. СПб.: Symposium, 2006. 574 с.
Куайн У.В.О. Слово и объект. М.: Логос, Праксис, 2000. 386 с.
Гончаренко М.В. Проблемы легитимации знания в контексте концепции критического рационализма К. Поппера и в постмодернистском дискурсе // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2015. № 390. С. 45-48.
Поппер К. Логика и рост научного знания. М.: Прогресс, 1983. 605 с.
Поппер К. Знание и психофизическая проблема. В защиту взаимодействия. М.: Изд-во ЛКИ, 2008. 256 с.
 About a perfored play as a physical thing (Some remarks to the notes of Sir K. Popper) | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2016. № 2(34).

About a perfored play as a physical thing (Some remarks to the notes of Sir K. Popper) | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2016. № 2(34).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2604