Semantics of metaphorical statements: paradigm of metaphors in the contemporary analytical philosophy | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2016. № 2(34).

Semantics of metaphorical statements: paradigm of metaphors in the contemporary analytical philosophy

The article is devoted to the study of the problems of semantics of the metaphorical statements in the contemporary analytical philosophy. Analytical theories are considered within two paradigms -binary and unary. Theorists of a binary paradigm make the semantic analysis of metaphorical statements, that is «...sees metaphor as a form of communication alongside ordinary communication; it conveys truths or falsehoods about the world much as plainer language does, though the message may be considered more exotic, profound, or cunningly garbed." [5, p. 174] . These theories lead to a binary model of semantics of metaphorical statements, which consists of two meanings: literal and not literal: M (+L (R) -L), where: M - metaphorical statement, +L - literal meaning, -L - nonliteral meaning, R -relations between literal and non-literal meanings. There are such theories , for example: 1. The theories of double reference (Goodman, Ricoeur) - («+L» / «-L») and ( [«+L»] «-L»). Within this theories «-L» is a new (metaphorical) reference 2. The theories of semantic interaction (Black) - ( («+L» (a, b)) ^ «-L» (c)), where «-L» (c) - the new (non-literal) sense 3. The theories of logical opposition (Beardsley) - («+L» (a,b) > «-L» (a, b)), where «+L» (a,b) -"logical opposition between the central meaning and that of other terms, there occurs that shift from central meaning to marginal meaning («-L» (a, b) - italics - ours) which shows the word is to be taken in a metaphorical way" [10. P. 208]. Contrariwise unary theories are based on unary model of semantics of metaphorical statements (as Davidson claimed "that metaphors mean what the words, in their most literal interpretation, mean, and nothing more" [5 173]): M (+L)*, where "+L" - literal meaning, * - non-semantic sign.. Non-semantic sign is main object of research in such theories. For example: 1) unusual seeing of objects (Davidson) 2) speaker's utterance meaning (Searle) 3) invitation to metaphorical transaction (Cohen), when "the speaker issues a kind of concealed invitation...", "the hearer expends a special effort to accept the invitation" and "this transaction constitutes the acknowledgment of a community" [7. P. 8]. Such theories are theories of an unary paradigm.

Download file
Counter downloads: 188

Keywords

Davidson, non-semantic sign, literal and not literal meanings, models of semantics of metaphorical statements, paradigms, the problems of semantics of the metaphorical statements in the contemporary analytical philosophy, унарная парадигма, бинарная парадигма, модель семантики метафорического высказывания, концептуальная установка, вопрос о семантике метафор

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Makhaev Mair R.Tomsk State Universitysuper-mahaev@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Macha J. Metaphor: Perceiving and Internal Relation // Papers of the 32 International Wittgenstein Symposium, Vol.17. 2009. P. 235-236.
Витгенштейн Л. Философские исследования. М.: Гнозис, 1994. 612 с.
Грайс П. Значение говорящего, предложения и слова // Философия языка / ред. Д. Серл. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2009. С. 75-98.
Философия без основани. Беседа М. Рыклина с Р. Рорти // Логос. 1996. № 8. С. 132154.
Бирдсли М. Метафорическое сплетение // Теория метафоры. М., 1990. С. 201-218.
Ричарде А. Философия риторики // Теория метафоры. М., 1990. С. 44-67.
Cohen T. Metaphor and Cultivation of Intimacy // Critical Inquiry. 1978 Vol. 5, № 1. P. 3-12.
Рикер П. Метафорический процесс как познание, воображение и ощущение // Теория метафоры. М., 1990. С. 416-434.
Дэвидсон Д. Что означают метафоры // Теория метафоры. М., 1990. С. 173-193.
Гудмен Н. Метафора - работа по совместительству // Теория метафоры. М., 1990. С. 194-201.
Перегудов Ф., Тарасенко Ф. Основы системного анализа. Томск: Изд-во НТЛ, 2011. 396 с.
Махаев М. К вопросу о структуризации проблемного поля аналитической философии метафоры // Вести. Том. гос. ун-та. 2015. № 392. С. 66-68.
Блэк М. Метафора // Теория метафоры. М., 1990. С. 153-172.
Серл Д. Метафора // Теория метафоры. М., 1990. С. 307-341.
 Semantics of metaphorical statements: paradigm of metaphors in the contemporary analytical philosophy | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2016. № 2(34).

Semantics of metaphorical statements: paradigm of metaphors in the contemporary analytical philosophy | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2016. № 2(34).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2607