Problems of modern methodology for studying the human
The article is devoted to the selection methodology for the study of man in the postmodern era. Fragmentation and variance of the human era of deconstruction prompted researchers to attempt to reach a conceptual unity in human problem finding relevant methodologies for the study of man. The author analyses several variants of human learning methodology. The first option is the complex approach proposed by academician I. Frolov. The complex approach contributes to rethink the entire scientific knowledge through the prism of human perspective, gives birth to new problems at the interface of different Sciences. Orientation of science to the man becomes the basis of its humanization. The second approach to the study of man, considered in article-synthesis methodologies, including categorical modeling, a systematic approach and hermeneutic procedure. There are two categories that represent the methodological significance. This is a self-identity (harmony human inner world) and self-transcendence (inner activity, reflecting the relationship of man in the world). The second component synthesis methodologies is a system approach, which considers a person in three ways of being: 1) natural creature; 2) substance of cultural-historical; 3) creature eternal, universal. And, finally, the third component is hermeneutic procedures aimed at discovering new meanings of life. The basis of hermeneutical procedures is the art of discovering and taking someone else's identity, which is especially relevant in the postmodern era. Of particular interest is a synergistic approach, in particular through the system human system knowledge of the language. Analysis of human interaction and the language allows to take into account both behavior and ambiguous multivariate supercomplex systems is subtle methodological tools. Philosophical anthropology is endowed with the Mission of integration, synthesis of knowledge about the person. Dissemination of methodological possibilities of philosophical anthropology in education will lead to understanding what identity we must raise today. Application of spectrum of methodologies, the removal of restrictions on studying in various aspects will help overcome reductionism, fragmentation and embark on the path of wisdom, creativity and humanism.
Keywords
человек образующийся, diversity of human, synergy, synthesis methodologies, complex approach, a single human-cognition, человек образующийся, многообразие человеческого, синтез методологий, синергетика, единое человекознание, комплексный подходAuthors
Name | Organization | |
Kozlova Tatiana A. | Нижегородский государственный педагогический университет им. К. Минина | kozlova-ta@inbox.ru |
References
