Actant-rhizome ontology of B. Latour | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 37. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/37/25

Actant-rhizome ontology of B. Latour

In the article a detailed analysis of the actant-rhizome ontology of B.Latour is performed. Analytical procedures are implemented on the basis of the problem field of relativistic ontologies of Leibniz and Deleuze, which are considered as conceptual premises of actant-rhizome ontology and which allow to explore its basic concepts in terms of relationships, associations and links. A historical typology of the problem relativistic field registers is based on a retrospective analysis of its modifications. The typology allows to trace the differences in the principles and laws of its construction and to determine the level at which the actant-rhizome ontology is constituted. Three types of registers are identified: ideal, real and physical. The ideal register is referred to the ontology of possible worlds of Leibniz. It is recognized that there are two main principles of its organization. The first one is the principle of pre-established harmony, which sets the ideal system of relations and interactions of the world eventness according to the law of conjunction. The second is the principle of impossibility of infinite set of possible worlds to the only existing real world. The real ontological register is represented by Deleuze's philosophy. The organizing principle of this register is described using the positional structure of the Other. This structure serves as a condition for providing real existence of possible worlds, and launching the principle of simultaneous existence of impossible worlds. The disjunction is recognized as the principle of the world synthesis. A special ontological region, excluding the structure of the Other and defined as a physical register, is allocated inside the real ontology. The processes of the opening of possible worlds, triggering the procedures of assembling and permanent transformations, as well as the processes of the intensification of the disjunctive syntheses, responsible for the linkages of the power circulating materiality, are described in this register. The actant-rhizome ontology of Latour is constituted at this level. Furthermore, it is here where the ontological and conceptual intersection of the philosophical and sociological discourses of Deleuze and Latour are observed, allowing to apply a philosophical conceptual apparatus of Deleuze to analytics of basic concepts of Latour's actant-rhizome ontology. The main concepts analyzed are the following: social, network, the collective assembly, human and non-human actors, plugins. In conclusion, it is noted that the physical register of relativistic ontology, which the actant-rhizome ontology belongs to, allows Latour to think of social as a process of re-establishment of links between elements that are not social, and start the process of intense transformations in the areas of living material objectivity.

Download file
Counter downloads: 229

Keywords

plugins, human and non-human actors, network, assembling, social, сборка, человеческие и не-человеческие акторы, плагины, the theory ofpossible worlds of G.Leibniz, rhizome, actant-rhizome ontology, сеть, социальное, актанто-ризомная онтология, ризома, теория возможных миров Г. Лейбница

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Fedorova Svetlana A.St. Petersburg State Universitysvetlanaun@yahoo.com
Всего: 1

References

Жижек С. Добро пожаловать в пустыню Реального / пер. с англ. А. Смирного. М.: Фонд «Прагматика культуры», 2002. 160 с.
Латур Б. Нового времени не было. Эссе по симметричной антропологии / пер. с фр. Д.Я. Калугина; науч. ред. О.В. Хархордин. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского ун-та в СПб., 2006. 240 с.
Latour B. On Interobjectivity // Mind, Culture and Activity. 1996. Vol. 3 (4). P. 228-245.
Латур Б. Когда вещи дают отпор: возможный вклад «исследований науки» в общественные науки // Социология вещей: сборник статей / под ред. В. Вахштайна. М.: Издат. дом «Территория будущего», 2006. С. 342-362.
Латур Б. Извините, вы не могли бы вернуть нам материализм? / пер. с англ. А. Морозова и М. Федянина // Философско-литературный журнал Логос. 2014. № 4(100). С. 265-274.
Latour В. On Recalling ANT // Actor Network Theory and After, eds. J. Law and J. Hassard. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1999. P. 15-25.
Иванов Д.В. К теории потоковых структур // Социологические исследования. 2012. № 4. С. 8-16.
Урри Дж. Мобильности / пер. с англ. А.В.Лазарева. М.: Праксис, 2012. 576 с.
Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. 381 p.
Делез Ж., Гваттари Ф. Тысяча плато: Капитализм и шизофрения / пер. с фр. и послесл. Я.И.Свирского; науч. ред. В.Ю. Кузнецов. Екатеринбург: У-Фактория; М.: Астрель, 2010. 895 с.
Делез Ж. Логика смысла / пер. с фр. Я.И. Свирского. М.: Раритет; Екатеринбург: Деловая книга, 1998. 480 с.
Urry J. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003. 184 p.
Harman G. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics, re.press, Melbourne, 2009.
Лейбниц Г.В., Сочинения: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1982-1989. Т. 1, 4.
Майоров Г.Г. Теоретические основания философии Г.В. Лейбница: учеб. пособие. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: КДУ, 2007. 312 с.
Делез Ж. Складка. Лейбниц и барокко / общ. ред. и послесл. В.А. Подороги; пер. с фр. Б.М. Скуратова. М.: Логос, 1997. 262 с.
Делез Ж., Гваттари Ф. Что такое философия? / пер. с фр. и послесл. С. Зенкина. М.: Ин-т экспериментальной социологии; СПб.: Алетейя, 1998. 286 с.
Делез Ж. Марсель Пруст и знаки / пер. с фр. Е.Г. Соколова. СПб.: Алетейя: Лаб. мета-физ. исслед. при филос. фак. СПбГУ, 1999. 188 с.
Латур Б. Пересборка социального: введение в акторно-сетевую теорию / пер. с англ. И. Полонской; под ред. С. Гавриленко. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2014. 384 с.
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. Second Edition. Oxford, 2000.
Knorr Cetina K., Preda A. The Temporalization of Financial Markets: From Network to Flow // Theory, Culture & Society, 2007. Vol. 24 (7-8).
 Actant-rhizome ontology of B. Latour | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 37. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/37/25

Actant-rhizome ontology of B. Latour | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 37. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/37/25