Philosophical cognition and architectural planning | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 39. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/39/2

Philosophical cognition and architectural planning

The article shows the results of comparative analysis of philosophical cognition and architectural planning. The logic of comparative analysis methodology is specified by the activity and the externalist approaches within the philosophical cognition and architectural planning are activities inscribed into a defined sociocultural context. The result of the comparative analysis revealed the relative similarity of these activities. Firstly, the subject of philosophical cognition and of architectural planning is a unity of subjective and objective, rational and emotional; the objectivism factors are social and cultural reality into which is inscribed the subject of philosophical cognition and of architectural planning, the paradigm of philosophizing, aesthetic paradigm, or style - for architectural planning; in both cases, the significance of the result is determined by the fact that the subject stands as the highest tension of emotional experience. Secondly, the methodological strategy of both types of activity is the design, the reconstruction, the deconstruction. Thirdly, the subject reality for philosophical cognition is becoming the ontological model of reality created by the author, the basic concepts which are the data of the phenomenological analysis, for the subject of architectural planning - the artistic reality, the system of artistic images, as data of hermeneutic-connotative intentions.

Download file
Counter downloads: 231

Keywords

философское познание, архитектурное проектирование, социокультурный контекст, эстетическая парадигма, философская парадигма, philosophical cognition, architectural planning, sociocultural context, aesthetic paradigm, philosophical paradigm

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kokarevich Maria N.Tomsk State University of Architecture and Buildingkokarevich@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Хабермас Ю. Философский дискурс о модерне. Двенадцать лекций. 2-е изд., испр. М.: Весь Мир, 2008. 416 с.
Вольтер Философские сочинения. М.: Наука, 1989. 752 с.
Гадамер Х.-Г. Истина и метод. М.: Прогресс, 1988. 704 с
Трубецкой Е. Умозрение в красках. Вопрос о смысле жизни в древнерусской религиозной живописи // Философия русского религиозного искусства XVI-XX вв. М.: Прогресс, 1993. С. 195-219.
Ницше Ф. О пользе и вреде истории для жизни. Соч. в 2 т. М.:Мысль, 1990. Т. 1. С. 158230.
Шпенглер О. Закат Европы. М.: Мысль, 1993. Т. 1. 663 с.
Шеллинг Ф.В.Й. Соч. в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1987. Т. 2. 636 с.
Деррида Ж. Голос и феномен и другие работы по теории знака Гуссерля. СПб.: Алетейя, 1999. 208 с.
Кокаревич М.Н. Становление культурологических систем как гносеологическая проблема // Вестник ТГУ. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2012. Вып. 4 (20). С. 44-51.
Курбатов В.И. История философии. Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 1997. 448 с.
Дильтей В. Сущность философии. М.: Интрада, 2001. 159 с.
Трёльч Э. Историзм и его проблемы. М.: Юрист, 1994. 719 с.
Рикёр П. Конфликт интерпретаций. М.: Академический проект, 2008. 695 с.
Кулхаас Р. Нью-Йорк вне себя. М.: Институт медиа, архитектуры и дизайна. 2013. 336 с.
 Philosophical cognition and architectural planning | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 39. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/39/2

Philosophical cognition and architectural planning | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 39. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/39/2

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2125