Franjafrique" and "New frontiers" in the context of subject-object relations

1960-th year became the year of Africa since then, many countries on the continent gained independence. Though it should be noted, that both the former colonizers and the United States sought to have influence in Africa, controlling the most important spheres of life in the new States. France had adopted the doctrine of "Franjafrique" (Franjafrique). The gist of it was that "leave but stay", that is, to maintain their influence in the former colonies, giving the latter a semblance of independence. In the United States was undertaken in weapons doctrine "new frontier" or "new frontiers". At the heart of it lay the idea that the United States will support the struggle of new States from the remnants of colonialism, but the United States will need to seek further ideological influence on OMONa-structure of the inhabitants of Africa. Was even proclaimed the slogan "Africa for Africans". It should be noted that in the realities of the early 1960s, African States should not be seen merely as a passive object of foreign policy activity of the USA and the former Colo-nization. The African countries, at least, had a choice -the choice of an influential ally in this case. Moreover, it could become not only France and the United States and the Soviet Union (by the way, these States re-ry is not exhaustive!). Thus, the subject person regardless of their desire/reluctance had to start to bribe the "object" (how great was that bribery is not so important - the main thing is that instead of unilateral pressure was a bargain!). Note also that in many respects the relationships that had often referred to as the "niokolo-nialism" was supported by a powerful ideological and political growth in new African States (such events always cause a rise in the humanitarian sphere). In the first years of independence began asset-but to develop the idea of pan-African unity, and the concept of African-sky socialism, and negritude.

Keywords

Authors

References