Music in the focus of modern neuroscience
The article try to comprehend the latest achievements in such a field of neuroscience as a neuroaesthetic that explores the nature of music and musical creativity through the prism of ontogenetic features of the human brain. Numerous examples show that the key ideas of neuro-aesthetics generally correspond to the spirit of Kantian apriorism, reinterpreted in modern terms of cognitive neuroscience. The research suggests the unity of the growth points of the cognitive mechanisms of scientific knowledge and the artistry, and vistas of the research movement in this direction. Cognitive studies make it possible to establish a direct relationship between musical practice and neurophysiological processes (in particular, with functional asymmetry of the cerebral hemispheres), and the formation of neuroscience of aesthetic experience, neuro-aesthetics. This field of knowledge has the goal to answer questions related to the neurophysiological mechanism of emotional influence of music, what structures in the brain are activated when listening, performing and composing music, are responsible for determining the sound, rhythm and tonality, as well as whether the perception of music at the neurophysiological level varies between men and women. In the first part of the study "Natural Languages and the Musical-Speech Continuum: the Community of Neurobiological Foundations", ontogenetic and neurobiological bases of musicality are revealed. The article deals with the idea of the commonness of neurobiological bases of natural languages and the musical-speech continuum, which confirmed by the data of neuroscience studies on the colocalization of brain regions responsible for linguistic and musical functions. Since music is traditionally directly associated with motor activity, dance, - the idea of the role of mirror neurons of the brain in the perception of the rhythm set by musical sounds in the modalities of consonance and dissonance expressed. In the second part of the work "Cultural-ethnic musical module as an ontogenetic basis of musicality" the concept of a musical module correlating with the cognitive neurostructure is suggested, in the formation of which certain cultural and ethnic features of the environment where it is formed and continues to be generated are involved. On the basis of data from studies of Western European and Eastern artistic practice, an unambiguous dependence of their genesis and evolution on mental and neurobiological factors, which distinguish representatives of different cultures, for example, biological modes in the form of internal pulse and respiration, physical and astronomical measurements of certain cultural and historical modes, is affirmed. An assumption is made about the nature of the difference between the Western (homophonic-harmonic, and later polyphonic) and Eastern (monodic) musical traditions. It assumed that reason for this difference explained by the predominance in the West of analytical, and in the East, holistic thinking, which generated by the corresponding differences of certain areas of the brain activity. Therefore, in the first case an unconditional preference is given to the individuality, and, consequently, to the harmonious orderliness of the polyphonic texture of the "points of view". In the second, belonging to a certain community united by cooperative activity, which gives this community integrity, important for its selfpreservation and self-identification, gave rise to the monodic constancy of recitation in combination with the immanent improvisation of intonations, the synchronization of sound impulses acquiring a collective meaning. The musical sound in the eastern musical tradition is an important factor of socialization and interaction between people. In the West, with its emphasis on individual personality traits, a different musical format adopted. The article touch the problem of the origin of music as an effective means of adapting a person to the environment. Analysis of the factors that made music an important part of human and social life allowed us to consider music as an important determinant of socialization and interaction between people. A number of researchers of the causes of the phenomenon of music pay attention to the almost unique quality of human society - the quality of synchronization of sound actions when the sound acquires a collective meaning and allows pursuing a collective goal.
Keywords
polyphonic and monodic music,
analytical and holistic thinking,
music,
neuroaesthetics,
cognitive neuroscience,
полифоническая и монодическая музыка,
аналитическое и холистическое мышление,
музыка,
нейроэстетика,
когнитивная нейронаукаAuthors
Bazhanov Valentin A. | Ulyanovsk State University | vbazhanov@yandex.ru |
Kraeva Alexandra G. | Ulyanovsk State University | kraevalex@mail.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Patel A. The Evolutionary Biology of Musical Rhythm: Was Darwin Wrong? // PLOS Biology. 2014. Vol. 121, № 3. Paper e1001821.
Dunbar R. On Evolutionary Foundations of Song and Dance // Music, Language, and Human Evolution / ed. N. Bannan. Oxford: Oxford University press, 2012. P. 201-214.
Huron D. Is Music and Evolutionary Adaptation? // The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music / Eds. Peretz I., Zatorre R. Oxford: Oxford University press, 2003. P. 57-78.
Sperber D. Explaining Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
Pinker S. How the Mind Works. N.Y.: W.W. Norton, 1997.
Cross I. Music, Cognition, Culture, and Evolution // The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music / Eds. Peretz I., Zatorre R. Oxford: Oxford University press, 2003. P. 42-56.
Chater N., Christiansen M. Language Acquisition Meets Language Evolution // Cognitive science. 2010. Vol. 34. P. 1131-1157. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01049.x
Sachs M.E., Damasio A., Habibi A. The pleasures of sad music: a systematic review // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. Article 404. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00404.
Ambady N. Bharucha J. Culture and brain // Current directions in psychological science. 2009. Vol. 18. N 6. P. 342-345.
Emmerson J. Your Mind on Music: Muffins, Magic, Mozart, Myth // LEARNing landscapes (LEARN). 2011. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 63-70.
Nisbett R.E. The geography of thought. How Asians and Westerners Think Differently.. and Why. N.Y., L.: The Free press, 2003.
Demorest S.M., Morrison S.J. Does music make you smarter? // Music Educators Journal. 2000. Vol. 87(2). P. 33-39.
Асафьев Б.В. Речевая интонация. М.; Л., Музыка, 1965. 136 с.
Бажанов В.А. Современная культурная нейронаука и природа субъекта познания: логико-эпистемологические измерения // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2015. Т. XLV, № 3. С. 133-149.
Nadal M., Pearce M.T. The Copenhagen Neuroaesthetics conference: Prospects and pitfalls for and emerging field // Brain and Cognition. 2011. Vol. 76. P. 172-183.
Tan Y.T., McPherson G.E., Peretz I., Berkovic S.F., Wilson S.J. The Genetic Basis of Music Ability // Frontiers in Psychology. 2014. Vol. 5, № 658.
Kinzler K.D., Spelke E.S. Core Systems in Human Cognition // Progress in Brain Research/ Eds. von Hofsen C., Rosander K. 2007. Vol. 164. P. 257-264.
Мёдова А.А. К проблеме обратимости времени // Философские науки. 2017. № 4. С. 129-144.
Кривцун О. Ритмы искусства и ритмы культуры: формы исторических сопряжений // Вопросы философии. 2005. № 6. С. 50-62.
Зедльмайр Г. Искусство и истина. Теория и метод истории искусства / пер. Ю.Н. Попова. СПб., 2000. 272 с.
Zatorre R., Salimpoor V. From Perception to Pleasure: Music and its Neural Substrates // PNAS. 2013. Vol. 110, № 2. P. 10430-10437. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301228110.
Buzsaki G. The Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University press, 2006. XIV, 465 p.
Ettlinger M., Margulis E., Wong C.M. Implicit Memory in Music and Language // Frontiers in Psychology. 2011. Vol. 2, № 211. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00211.
Messiaen О. Traite de rythme, de couleur, et d’ornitologie. Paris, 1995. T. 2. 530 р.
Ценoвa В.С. Числoвые тaйны Сoфии Губaйдулинoй. М.: Музыкa, 2000. 197 с.
Бaуэр Д, Пaрсoнс Л. Этот зaгaдoчный мoзжечoк // В мире науки. 2003. № 10. C. 72-77.
Goldberger Z. Did Beethoven have an irregular heartbeat? Diagnosing the composer through his music // The conversation. 2015. February, 15. https://theconversation.com/did-beethoven-have-an-irregular-heartbeat-diagnosing-the-composer-through-his-music-36113 (accessed Aug 12, 2017).
Kunert R., Willems R.M., Hagoort P. Language influences music harmony perception: effects of shared syntactic integration resources beyond attention // Royal Society Open Science. 2016. Vol. 3(2). Paper 150685.
Patel A. Music, Language, and the Brain. N.Y.: Oxford University press, 2008. 528 p.
Brattico E., Pearce M. The Neuroaesthetics of Music // Psychology of Aestheticism Creativity, and the Arts. 2013. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 48-61.
McDermott J., Hauser M. The Origins of Music: Innateness, Uniqueness, and Evolution // Music Perception. 2005. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 29-59.
Corbeil M., Trehub S.E., Peretz I. Speech vs. Singing: Infants Choose Happier Sounds // Frontiers in Psychology. 2013. Vol. 4, № 372.
Koelsch S., Siebel W.A. Towards a Neural Basis of Music Perception // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005. ^l. 9, № 12. P. 578-584.
Sirios S., SpratlingM., JohnsonM., ThomasM., Westermann G., MarshallD. Precis of neuroconstructivism: how the brain constructs cognition // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2008. Vol. 31 (3). P. 321-331; discussion 331-356.
Марютина Т.М. Нейроконструктивизм - новая парадигма возрастной психофизиологии? // Современная зарубежная психология. 2014. Т. 3, № 4. С. 132-143.
Cartwright J. Evolution and Human Behaviour. Houndmills: MacMillan, 2000.
Honing H., Cate C., Peretz I., Trehub S.E. Without it No Music: Cognition, Biology and Evolution of Musicality // Philosophical Transactions B. 2015. Vol. 370. Paper 2014088. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0088
Fritz J., Poeppel D., Trainor L., Schlaug G., Patel A., Peretz I., Rauschecker J., Halle J., Stregapede F., Parsons L.M. The Neurobiology of Language, Speech, and Music // Language, Music, and the Brain: A Mysterious Relationship /Ed. M. A. Arbib. Cambridge (Mass.); L., 2013. P. 417-462.
НазайкинскийЕ.В. Логика музыкальной композиции. М.: Музыка, 1982. 319 с.
Rusinova M. Reflections on Beauty: Immanuel Kant and Semir Zeki // 5th International Conference on Research in Humanities, Sociology and Education. London, November 29-30, 2016. P. 90-91.
Красота и мозг. Биологические аспекты эстетики / под ред. И. Ренчлера, Б. Херцбер-гер, Д. Эпстайна. М.: Мир, 1995. 335 с.
Habibi A., Damasio A. Music, Feelings, and the Human Brain // Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain. 2014. Vol. 24 (1). P. 92-102. DOI: 10.1037/pmu000003.
Janata P., Reisberg D. Response-Time Measures as a Means of Exploring Tonal Hierarchies // Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Vol. 6. No. 2 (1988). P. 161-172.
Pearce M.T., Zaidel D.W., Vartanian O., Skov M., Leder H., Chatterjee A., Nadal M. Neuroaesthetics: the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience // Perspectives on psychological science. 2016. Vol. 11 (2). P. 265-279. DOI: 10.1177/1745691615621274.
Vessel E.A., Starr G., Rubin N. The Brain on Art: Intense Aesthetic Experience Activates the Default Mode Network // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2012. Vol. 6. Article 66. P. 1-17. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00066.
Starr G. Feeling Beauty: The Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience. MIT Press, 2013. 272 р.
Molnar-Szakacs I., Overy K. Music and Mirror Neurons: Form Motion to ‘e’motion // SCAN. 2006. № 1. P. 235-241. DOI: m.1039/scan/nsl029.
Amer T., Kalender B., Hasher L., Trehub S.E., Wong Y. Do Older Professional Musicians Have Cognitive Advantages? // PLOS One. 2013. Vol. 8, № 8. Paper e71630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071630.
Zatorre R. Music, the Food of Neuroscience? // Nature. 2005. Vol. 434. P. 312-315.