Relationship between religion and science in modern world: analysis approaches to the problem | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/5

Relationship between religion and science in modern world: analysis approaches to the problem

The main research subject is the problem relationship between religion and science in modern world. Since a unified position in relation to the evaluation of these relations is missing, the article analyzes the main approaches to solving this problem is incompatibility and conflict, independence, dialog and integration. Most contemporary researchers in this issue do not support the thesis that religion and science are in conflict with each other. The most popular is a point of view, considering religion and science as an independent field of knowledge of reality, having its own subject and methods of research. Some researchers believe that religion and science are “overlapping” region of the knowledge, particularly the concept of the structure and appearance of the world, life and man. In this areas they can dialog with each other. The adherents of the position integration believe that scientific discoveries of recent times given the opportunity to prove the truth certain religious ideas. This suggests that, over time, can form a single set of ideological views, recognized in religion and in science. From the author's point of view the processes happening today in the sphere of the relations of religion and science is complex and ambiguous. It is obvious that the institutional integration of religion and science is impossible and is not subject to any public needs. Religion and science are separate social institutions that perform different social functions. However, in the ideological field there is a constant mutual work of analysis and evaluation of ideas and concepts. New breakthroughs non-classical science in the study of the nature of matter, micro and macrocosm, creation of fundamental theories of the world, life and man in the twentieth century only reinforced this process. Interestingly, he was accompanied not only mutual criticism, as it was previously, but also the release of such concepts, ideas and representations that have identical contents and about the same are understood as in religious teachings and scientific theories. This process is due to a real social need, namely, to overcome the feeling of cognitive dissonance, which a modern person when meeting with religious and scientific ideas about the world. For this reason, the possibility of overcoming of these contradictions continues to be of interest, as theologians and scientists.

Download file
Counter downloads: 221

Keywords

dialog, integration, science, outlook, интеграция, religion, диалог, мировоззрение, наука, религия

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Klementyeva Tatiana N.Novosibirsk State Medical Universitytklementyeva@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Polkinghorne J.C. Science and Religion in Quest of Truth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011. 160 p.
Polkinghorne J.C. Exploring Reality: The Intertwining of Science and Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007. 200 p.
Polkinghorne J.C. Theology in the Context of Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. 166 p.
Barbour I. G. When Science Meets Religion: Enemies, Strangers, or Partners? San Francisco: HarperCollins Publishers, 2000. 224 p.
Барбур И. Религия и наука: история и современность / пер. с англ. М.: Библейскобогословский институт, 2001. 430 с.
Barbour I.G Myths, Models and Paradigms. A Comparative Study in Science and Religion. San Francisco: HarperCollins Publishers, 1974. 208 p.
Тейяр де Шарден П. Божественная среда / пер. с фр. М.: Ренессанс, 1992. 312 с.
Далай-Лама XIV. Интервью 1981 г. / Интервью в Бодхгайе. 1981-1985 гг. С. 5 // БиблиотекаRIN.RU URL: http://lib.rin.ru/doc/i/3919p.html (дата обращения: 31.01.2017).
Plantinga A. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press. 2011. 359 p.
Plantinga A., Dennett D. Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? New York: Oxford University Press. 2010. 96 p.
Шахов М.О. Реализм как общая основа религиозного и научного знания // Вопросы философии. 2008. № 10. С. 66-77.
Алёшин А.И. Сближает ли религию и науку «эпистемологическая релятивизация науки»? // Проблема демаркации науки и теологии: современный взгляд / отв. ред. И.Т. Касавин. М.: ИФ РАН, 2008. С. 62-83.
Вайнгартнер П. Сходство и различие между научной и религиозной верой // Вопросы философии. 1996. № 5. С. 90-109.
Шахов М.О. Религиозное и научное знание, религиозная и научная вера // Проблема демаркации науки и теологии: современный взгляд / отв. ред. И.Т. Касавин. М.: ИФ РАН, 2008. С.40-61.
Полани М. Личностное знание. На пути к посткритической философии / пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1985. 344 с.
Фейерабенд П. Против метода. Очерк анархистской теории познания / пер. с англ. М.: АСТ; Хранитель, 2007. 413 с.
Тулмин С. Концептуальные революции в науке // Структура развития науки. Из Бостонских исследований по философии науки / пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1978. С. 170-190.
Platt W., Baker B. The relation of the scientific "hunch" to research // Journal of Chemical Education. 1931. Vol. 8. P. 27-35.
Schilling H. Science and religion: an interpretation of two communities. New York and London: Routledge, 1963. 288 p.
Микешина Л.А. Ценностные предпосылки в структуре научного познания. М.: Наука, 1990. 380 с.
Степин В.С. Теоретическое знание. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000. 744 с.
Пуанкаре А. Наука и метод // А. Пуанкаре О науке / пер. с фр. М.: Наука. Главная редакция физико-математической литературы, 1983. С. 283-404.
Бернар К. Введение к изучению опытной медицины / пер. с фр. М.: КРАСАНД, 2010. 314 с.
Бунге М. Интуиция и наука. М.: Прогресс, 1967. 188 с.
Ирина В.Р., Новиков В.В. В мире научной интуиции: интуиция и разум. М.: Наука, 1978. 192 с.
Seybold K. The Untidiness of Integration: John Stapylton Habgood // Communication: Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith. 2005. V 57, № 2. P. 114-119.
Coyne J.A. Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible. New York: Viking, 2015. 336 p.
Gould S.J. Rocks of Ages. Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine Publishing Group, 1999. 222 p.
Coyne J.A. The Faith That Dare Not Speak Its Name. The case against intelligent design. // The New Republic. August 22 & 29, 2005. P. 21-33.
Щавелёв С.П. Демаркация типов знания: по «горизонтали» или «по вертикали» пространства культуры // Проблема демаркации науки и теологии: современный взгляд / отв. ред. И.Т. Касавин. М.: ИФ РАН, 2008. С. 25-29.
Докинс Р. Бог как иллюзия / пер. с англ. М.: КоЛибри, 2010. 560 с.
 Relationship between religion and science in modern world: analysis approaches to the problem | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI:  10.17223/1998863Х/40/5

Relationship between religion and science in modern world: analysis approaches to the problem | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/5

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3192