Markers and the effects of information anomie in political communication | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/11

Markers and the effects of information anomie in political communication

In the new information-technological way, the communicative process through electronic means of communication is an optical, almost instantaneous, way of producing a multitude of meanings simultaneously, in contrast to oral and written communication, which is characterized by diffuse propagation (slow, chaotic process of disseminating meanings). The communication process acquires such characteristic features as nonlinearity, emergence, multivariance, spontaneity, viral-ness and has hard-to-predict consequences. The use of new information technologies has also affected the political sphere of society, where information becomes a strategic resource of power. The production and specific weight of the symbolic capital of political power is directly dependent on the acceptance and perception of collective-binding political decisions by the mass audience. Political communication becomes anomalous, due to the mismatch in the communicative process. The characteristic features of the anomaly of political communication are manifested as following: 1. Information impact and interaction ceases to be a controlled process; 2. The media become "factories of uncertainty"; 3. The ambivalent consequences of the produced meanings in political communication lead to the decoherence of the communication itself and to the growth of public distrust of the authorities and the media; 4. The communicative process becomes non-linear, multivariate, spontaneous, viral and prone to accidents; 5. The world political process functions in a single information space in which new vectors of policy perception are set and narrow local boundaries of the individual "personal-habitable-zone" are torn; 6. The continuous process of aberrating information becomes a characteristic feature of political communication, in which each of the actors has the opportunity to change the meaning of information; Information anomie as a complex of socio-techno-cultural phenomena of information aberrations, leads to the destruction of the normality of the process of political communication, resulting in a mismatch of "collective binding", which leads to entropy of the social system. The following markers of information anomie in political communication can be highlighted: The credit limit of trust. Reduction of the credit of public confidence leads to a decrease in the level of accumulation of the symbolic capital of the government and the media. Distortion in the balance of confidence, through decrease in its degree. It leads to the destruction of "collective binding". The effects of information anomie in the political sphere reflect the growing process of aberration of the meaning of information by all participants in political communication: • Scalability; • Virulence; • Retrospective; • Growth-Hacking; • Danger. It is concluded that minimizing the destructive information impact, which creates threats, dangers and risks to the sustainable development of the society becomes the most important task of all participants in political communication.

Download file
Counter downloads: 184

Keywords

aberration marker, effect, information anomie, anomie, information, political communication, эффект, маркер, аберрация, информационная аномия, аномия, политическая коммуникация, информация

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Karpova Anna Yu.Tomsk Polytechnic Universitybelts@tpu.ru
Всего: 1

References

Bauman Z. Collateral Damage. Social Inequalities in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.
Bauman Z. Moral Blindness. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
A new understanding: What makes people trust and rely on news. This research was conducted by the Media Insight Project - an initiative of the American Press Institute and the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Feb, 2016. URL: https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/trust-news/single-page/ (accessed: 21/04/2016).
Маклюэн Г.М. Понимание Медиа: Внешнее расширение человека / пер. с англ. В. Николаева; закл. ст. М. Вавилова. М.: Жуковский: «Канон-пресс-Ц», «Кучково поле», 2003. 464 с.
Gallup. Доверие американцев СМИ остается на историческом минимуме. Электронный ресурс // Режим доступа: http://www.gallup.com/poll/185927/americans-trust-media-remains-historical-low.aspx (дата обращения: 25.08.2017).
Quinnipiac University National Poll. Obama Is First As Worst President Since WWII. URL: http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2056 (accessed 25/08/2017); Pew Research Poll Database. Apr, 2015. URL: http://www.pewresearch.org/question search/?keyword=confidence+obama&x=0&y=0 (accessed: 25/08/2017).
Кови С., Линк Г. Разумное доверие // Smart trust. Stephen M. R. Covey, Greg Link / пер. с англ. Л.А. Бабук. Минск: Попурри, 2013. 155 с.
Moussaida, M., Herzoga, S.M., Kammera, J.E. & Hertwiga, R. Reach and speed of judgment propagation in the laboratory. PNAS. 2017 № 114(16) URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/114/16/4117.abstract (accessed: 20/08/2017).
Карпова А.Ю. Эвристический потенциал расширения концепции аномии // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2016. № 4. C. 174-184.
Бодрийяр Ж. Симулякры и симуляция / пер. О.А. Печенкина. Тула, 2013. 204 с.
Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие: / пер. с нем.; под ред. Д.В. Скляднева, послесл. Б.В. Маркова. СПб., 2000. 380 с.
Винер Н. Кибернетика и общество / пер. с англ. Е.Г. Панфилова; общ. ред. и пред. Э.Я. Кольмана. М.: Издательство иностранной литературы, 1958. 198 с.
Штомпка П. Доверие - основа общества. М.: Логос, 2012. 450 с.
Thompson K. Moral Panics. London and New York: Routledge, 1998. 157 p.
Beck U. From Industrial Society to Risk Society // Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment. Theory, Culture and Society. 1992. Vol. 9. P. 97-123.
Lyotard J. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. 110 p.
Штомпка П. Социология. Анализ современного общества / пер. с пол. С.М. Червонной. М.: Логос, 2005. 656 с.
Чупров В.И., Михеева В.В. Доверие в обществе как фактор преодоления кризиса // Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2015. № 4. С. 237-251.
Хиршман А. О. Риторика реакции: извращение, тщетность, опасность / пер. с англ. М.: Изд. дом гос. ун-та Высш. шк. экономики, 2010. 207 с.
Beck U. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. 240 p.
Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 09.05.2017 г. № 203. Электронный ресурс. Режим доступа: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&firstDoc=1&lastDoc=1&nd=102431687 (дата обращения: 26.09.2017).
Бауман З. Текучая современность / пер. с англ.; под ред. Ю.В. Асочакова. СПб.: Питер, 2008. 240 с.
Granovetter M.S. The Strength of Weak Ties // American Journal of Sociology. 1973. Vol. 78, Issue 6. P. 1360-1380.
Luhmann N. Politische Soziologie, Hrsg von Andre Kieserling. Suhrkamp, Berlin 2010, 500 S.
Стратегия развития информационного общества в Российской Федерации от 7 февраля 2008 г. N Пр-212. Электронный ресурс. Режим доступа: https://rg.ru/2008/ 02/16/informacia-strategia-dok.html (дата обращения: 26.09.2017).
 Markers and the effects of information anomie in political communication | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI:  10.17223/1998863Х/40/11

Markers and the effects of information anomie in political communication | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/11

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3192