The universal characteristic of G. W. Leibniz and the prospective developments in the foundations of mathematics | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/16

The universal characteristic of G. W. Leibniz and the prospective developments in the foundations of mathematics

G. W. Leibniz was not the first who expressed the idea of creating a universal perfect language, but he proposed a very different approach in his project. The purpose of Leibniz’s project was to represent all human knowledge in the form of a kind of “universal algebra.” Leibniz intended to implement the translation into this universal language with the help of a universal characteristic, to which some special computing operations could be applied. By “characters” Leibniz meant symbols used to denote both numbers and geometric quantities. Since logic is similar to algebra, according to Leibniz, it must be built as a “universal mathematics.” As part of the development of this idea, he undertook a number of attempts to arithmeticize and algebraize syllogistics. Despite the setbacks that befell Leibniz in this work, two points must be specially emphasized. First, logic was subjected to arithmetization (logical relations were represented in the form of arithmetic or algebraic ones). Secondly, it should be noted that the resulting systems were intensional (the relationship between concepts, as well as the structure of propositions acquired an intensional interpretation). Leibniz discovered some kind of correspondence between the statements of logic and the statements of geometry in the course of his research. Further development of the ideas of Leibniz was carried out by two somewhat opposite ways. The first way is to build up logic as a calculus free of all content, as a study of a pure logical form. This path is associated primarily with the algebra of logic. The second way can be traced through the ideas of Neo-Kantianism, Grassmann, J. Peano and G. Frege, through the emergence and development of type theory and, finally, in modern approaches to the foundations of mathematics, and primarily in the homo-topy type theory. In modern variations of the type theory, the distinction between logical form and non-logical content ceases to be clear. In the homotopy type theory, the logical form has a geometric nature. In connection with the Leibniz’s program, it should be noted that indeed the homotopy type theory has the required characteristics: it is intensional, it has a computational interpretation and directly describes calculations, it does not require the use of an external deductive system, its “logical” and “geometric” interpretations are equivalent, it does not assumes the reduction of the whole variety of mathematical entities to the entities of some special kind, and it is structuralist in its nature.

Download file
Counter downloads: 174

Keywords

geometrism, univalent foundations of mathematics, philosophy of mathematics, Leibniz, геометризм, унивалентные основания математики, философия математики, Лейбниц

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Lamberov Lev D.Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yelstinlev.lamberov@urfu.ru
Kozyakova Tatiana S.Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yelstint.kozyakova@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Ламберов Л.Д. Основания математики: теория множества vs. теория типов // Философия науки. 2017. №1 (72). С. 41-60.
Awodey S. Structuralism, Invariance, and Univalence. Philosophia Mathematica. 22. 2014. P. 1-11.
Cohen С., Coquand T., Huber S., Mortberg A. Cubical Type Theory: A Constructive Interpretation of the Univalence Axiom // ArXiv e-prints, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02108.
Monroe D. A New Type of Mathematics? // Communications of the ACM. 2014. Vol. 57, No. 2. P. 13-15.
Фреге Г. Булева вычислительная логика и моё исчисление понятий // Фреге Г. Логика и логическая семантика. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. С. 158-193.
Фреге Г. Об исчислении понятий господина Пеано и о моём собственном исчислении // Фреге Г. Логика и логическая семантика. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. С. 201-212.
Фреге Г. О научной правомерности исчисления понятий // Фреге Г. Логика и логическая семантика. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. С. 153-157.
Бирюков В.В. Введение. Готлоб Фреге: современный взгляд // Фреге Г. Логика и логическая семантика: Сборник трудов. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. С. 8-62.
Родин А. Логический и геометрический атомизм от Лейбница до Воеводского // Вопросы философии. 2016. № 6. С. 135-142.
Cantu P. The Right Order of Concepts: Grafimann, Peano, Godel and the Inheritance of Leibniz's Universal Characteristic // Philosophia Scienti®. 2014. Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 157-182.
Hintikka J. Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
Kneale W., Kneal M. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
Heath A.E. The Geometrical Analysis of Grassmann and its Connection With Leibniz's Characteristic // The Monist. 1917. Vol. 27, No. 1. P. 36-56.
Лейбниц Г.В. Об универсальной науке, или философском исчислении // Соч. в четырёх томах. М.: Мысль, 1984. Т. 3. С. 494-500.
Маковельский А.О. История логики. Жуковский; М.: Кучково поле, 2004.
 The universal characteristic of G. W. Leibniz and the prospective developments in the foundations of mathematics | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI:  10.17223/1998863Х/40/16

The universal characteristic of G. W. Leibniz and the prospective developments in the foundations of mathematics | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/16

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3192