Peter Geach on ascriptivism | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/27

Peter Geach on ascriptivism

This article is concerned with critical arguments of Peter Geach against some theories of nondescriptive performances as they stated in his article “Ascriptivism”. Geach’s article launch a wholesale attack on these theories advanced by “some Oxford philosophers” whom he accuses of ignoring “the distinction between calling a thing ‘P’ and predicating ‘P’ of the thing”. In it, Geach provides a fairly detailed description of Frege’s arguments in relation to prescriptivism (replacing it with the term “ascriptivism”), set forth, in his opinion, in an article by Herbert Hart, “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights”. Geach specifically targets Hart’s claim that sentences of the form “He did it” are not primarily descriptive but ascriptive of responsibility for actions. The translation into Russian P. Geach “Ascriptivism” is presented in appendix.

Download file
Counter downloads: 183

Keywords

каузальность, утверждение, аскриптивизм, дескриптивизм, П. Гич, Г. Харт, ascriptivism, descriptivism, causality, assertion, P. Geach, H. Hart

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Ogleznev Vitaly V.Tomsk State University; Russian State University of Justice West-Siberian Branchogleznev82@mail.ru
Surovtsev Valeriy A.Tomsk State Universitysurovtsev1964@mail.ru
Всего: 2

References

Оглезнев В.В. Г.Л.А. Харт и формирование аналитической философии права. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2012.
Оглезнев В.В., Суровцев В.А. Аналитическая философия, юридический язык и философия права. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2016.
Суровцев В.А. Примечания переводчика // Фреге Г. Логико-философские труды. Новосибирск: Сиб. унив. изд-во, 2008. С. 102-124.
Касаткин С.Н. Как определять социальные понятия? Концепция аскриптивизма и отменяемое™ юридического языка Герберта Харта. Самара: Самар. гуманит. акад., 2014. Цит. по: Юм Д. Трактат о человеческой природе. М.: Мысль, 1996. - Прим. пер.
Sugarman D. Hart Interviewed: H.L.A. Hart in Conversation with David Sugarman // Journal of Law and Society. 2005. Vol. 32, No. 2. P. 267-293.
Hart H.L.A. Punishment and Responsibility. Essays in Philosophy of Law. Oxford Clarendon Press, 1968.
Pitcher G. Hart on Action and Responsibility // Philosophical Review. 1960. Vol. 69, No. 2. P. 226-235.
Оглезнев В.В. Проблема Фреге - Гича и аскриптивные высказывания // Философия науки. 2014. № 1(60). С. 39-52.
Schroeder M. What is the Frege-Geach Problem? // Philosophy Compass. 2008. Vol. 3/4. P. 703-720.
Харт Г.Л.А. Философия и язык права / пер. с англ.; под ред. В.В. Оглезнева и В.А. Суровцева, М.: Канон+, 2017.
Geach P. Ascriptivism // Philosophical Review. 1960. Vol. 69, No. 2. P. 221-225.
Geach P. Assertion // Philosophical Review. 1965. Vol. 74, No. 4. P. 449-465.
 Peter Geach on ascriptivism | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/27

Peter Geach on ascriptivism | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2017. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/40/27

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3192