Means of mass communication as a factor for forming the image of the country in mass consciousness | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 41. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/41/17

Means of mass communication as a factor for forming the image of the country in mass consciousness

The article is devoted to the problem of forming the image of the country in the mass political consciousness and the role of the media in this process. Since the process of political perception is mediated by channels for obtaining information and communication, traditional and non-traditional Media largely determine both the communicative image and the image, which is then formed in the mass consciousness. That is why, in the context of informatization and globalization of the world geopolitical space, psychological and communicative aspects must be taken into account when the state develops strategies for its behavior. The article considers the political-psychological and politico-communicative approaches to this issue. The author analyzes various views on the structural components of the image of the country. In particular: the image of the people, the image of power, national heroes, "friends", "enemies", political leader, as well as the image-knowledge, image-value and image of the future. All these elements of the image are considered from the point of view of the possibility of their formation with the help of the media. The main theories of political communication analyzed in the work allow us to consider the media as a factor in the formation of cognitive, emotional and behavioral components of the image of the country. The information, educational, propaganda functions of the QMS, as well as the function of forming public opinion, can significantly influence the process of political perception. This is due to the popularization of certain knowledge and facts about the object of perception, as well as the formation of stereotypes, social attitudes, values and needs. Media form the context of the perception of the country through the creation and popularization of information causes and the formation of the agenda, and also affect the objective and subjective factors of political perception. In other words, mass media can simultaneously be communicators and channels of information transfer, agents and institutions of education and socialization, as well as creators of a certain kind of stereotypes. The aspects of media activity described in the article can help the state in the formation of an information and image strategy.

Download file
Counter downloads: 268

Keywords

политическое восприятие, образ, страна, СМИ, коммуникация, political perception, image, country, media, communication

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Palitay Ivan S.Lomonosov Moscow State University8321532@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Грачёв Г.В., Мельник И.К. Манипулирование личностью: организация, способы и технологии информационно-психологического воздействия. М.: Эксмо, 2003. 153 с.
Агеев В.С., Андреева Г.М. Специфика подхода к исследованию перцептивных процессов в социальной психологии // Социальная психология: хрестоматия / сост. Е.Б. Белинская. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2003. С. 128-193.
Галумов Э.А. Международный имидж современной России: автореф. дис.. д-ра полит. наук. М., 2004. 50 с.
Липпман У. Общественное мнение. М.: Ин-т фонда «Общественное мнение», 2004. 384 с.
Бандура А. Теория социального научения. СПб.: Евразия, 2000. 290 с.
Ноэль-Нойман Э. Общественное мнение: Открытие спирали молчания. М.: Прогресс-Академия, 1996. 352 с.
Boulding K. National Images and International Systems // Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1959. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 120-131.
Lasswell H.D. The structure and function of communication in society // Bryson (ed.). The Communication of Ideas. N.Y.: Harper and Brothers, 1948. P. 215-228.
Политическая социология / под ред. Т.В. Евгеньевой. М.: РОССПЭН, 2013. 520 с.
Егорова-Гантман Е.В., Плешаков К.В. Политическая реклама. М.: Никколо М, 2002. 240 с.
Гойхман О.Я. Коммуникативистика в современном обществе // Современная коммуни-кативистика. 2012. № 1 (1). С. 4-9.
Бориснёв С.В. Социология коммуникации. М.: ЮНИТИ, 2003. 270 с.
Пищева Т.Н., Виноградова Н.С., Недова А.Д. Образ России под углом зрения политических коммуникаций // Полис. Политические исследования. 2010. № 4. С. 107-121.
Киселев И.Ю. Проблема образа государства в международных отношениях: конструктивистская парадигма // Политическая экспертиза: Политэкс. 2007. № 3. С. 253-260.
Психология политического восприятия в современной России / под ред. Е.Б. Шестопал. М.: РОССПЭН, 2012. 423 с.
Greenstein F.J. Can Personality and Politics Be Studied Systematically // Political Psychology: Key Readings / ed. by John T. Jost and James Sidanius. N.Y.: Taylor & Francis Books, 2004. P. 108-123.
Брунер Дж. Психология познания: За пределами непосредственной информации: пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1977. 413 с.
Зверев А.Л., Палитай И.С., Рогозарь А.И., Смулькина Н.В. Особенности политического восприятия в современных российских условиях // Полис. Политические исследования. 2006. № 3. С. 40-54.
Величковский Б.М., Зинченко В.П., Лурия А.Р. Психология восприятия. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1973. 180 с.
Журавлев И. Психология и психопатология восприятия: Пролегомены к теории «зонда». М.: ЛКИ, 2008. 128 с.
Crigler A.N. The Psychology of Political Communication. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1996. 262 p.
Палитай И. С. Методология политико-психологического исследования массового политического сознания в трансформирующихся обществах // Политическая наука. 2016. Спецвыпуск. С. 193-203.
Вершинин М. С. Политическая коммуникация в информационном обществе // Актуальные проблемы теории коммуникации: сб. науч. тр. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГПУ, 2004. С. 98-107.
 Means of mass communication as a factor for forming the image of the country in mass consciousness | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 41. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/41/17

Means of mass communication as a factor for forming the image of the country in mass consciousness | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 41. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/41/17

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1726