Alf Ross on Definition in Legal Language | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 41. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/41/23

Alf Ross on Definition in Legal Language

The article deals with a very interesting and original approach to a new understanding of the role of definition in legal science, developed by the representative of Scandinavian legal realism, Alf Ross. It is shown that the basis of Ross's theory is the orientation on social facts and the "empiristic postulate", which methodologically bring his approach to the empiricist tradition within the framework of analytical philosophy, especially with a logical empiricism of R. Carnap. Ross represents his main thesis that abstract legal terms have a meaning only in context. In addition to its main tenet, Ross's paper also contains a criticism of essentialism in a definition of legal terms and some comments on the relative importance of legal definitions in common law countries as compared with countries of codified law. The translation into Russian A. Ross "Definition in Legal Language" is presented in appendix.

Download file
Counter downloads: 266

Keywords

определение, юридические термины, социальные факты, эмпирический постулат, А. Росс, Р. Карнап, definition, legal terms, social facts, empiristic postulate, A. Ross, R. Carnap

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Ogleznev Vitaly V.Tomsk State University; Russian State University of Justice West-Siberian Branchogleznev82@mail.ru
Surovtsev Valeriy A.Tomsk State University; Russian State University of Justice West-Siberian Branchsurovtsev1964@mail.ru
Всего: 2

References

Hart H.L.A. Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence // Law Quarterly Review. 1954. Vol. 70. P. 37-60.
Харт Г.Л.А. Философия и язык права / пер. с англ. под ред. В.В. Оглезнева, В.А. Суровцева. М.: Канон+, 2017.
Оглезнев В.В., Суровцев В.А. Аналитическая философия права Г. Харта и правовой реализм // Правоведение. 2013. № 4 (309). С. 134-147.
Ross A. Definition in Legal Language // Logique Et Analyse. 1958. Vol. 1, № 3/4. P. 139-149.
Scarpelli U. La Definition en Droit // Logique Et Analyse. 1958. Vol. 1, № 3/4. P. 127-138.
Оглезнев В.В., Суровцев В.А. В каком смысле определения могут быть истинными или ложными: о работе А. Папа «Теория определений» // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2017. № 38. С. 283-295.
Карнап Р. Философские основания физики. М.: КомКнига, 2006.
Оглезнев В.В., Суровцев В.А. Определение в аналитической философии права: П. Хакер versus Г. Харт // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2017. № 421. С. 36-40.
Ross A. On Law and Justice. Berkley: University of Chicago Press, 1959.
Kelsen H. What is Justice? Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science: Collected Essays. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.
Ross A. Tu-Tu // Harvard Law Review. 1957. Vol. 70, № 5. P. 812-825.
Popper K. The Open Society and its Enemies II. London: Routledge, 1945.
Geiger T. Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Copenhagen, 1947.
 Alf Ross on Definition in Legal Language | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 41. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/41/23

Alf Ross on Definition in Legal Language | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 41. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/41/23

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1726