Heidegger's counterargumentation to the Aristotelian interpretation of time and its criticism | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/42/6

Heidegger's counterargumentation to the Aristotelian interpretation of time and its criticism

Clarification of the bases of the Aristotelian approach to the interpretation of time and the specifics of post-Aristotelian studies allowed revealing the degree of the proximity of the classical theory and a number of non-classical concepts to the ordinary or instrumental representation of time. The analysis of Heidegger's counterargumentation to instrumental ways of interpretation of time which goes back to Aristotle is carried out. The counterargumentation shows Aristotle's ideas going beyond instrumentalism in the interpretation of time. The conducted research disclosed the incompleteness of judgment of the ideas stated by Aristotle on the basis of the ordinary or instrumental interpretation of time formulated as statements: (1) time is identical to the results of measurement of duration, (3) time is identical to the results of measurement of duration which is determined by the frequency or probability of events at the speed of a body close to that of light, and (4) time is identical to the results of measurement of duration which is determined by the frequency or probability of events in the perception field of the subject. According to Aristotle, time can be interpreted as a sphere in which the grammar of language expresses the horizon of the expected acts and states peculiar to people. Therefore, Aristotle fits the interpretation of time both into the context of statement (1), and in the framework of the thesis (2) time is identical to the basis of being, in versions (5) time is identical to the basis of being that coincides with the questioning type of being, and (6) time is identical to the basis of being that coincides with the subject type of being. The continuity of Aristotle's ideas and the instrumental interpretation of time as systems of measurement of processes are combined with an anticipation of alternative approaches to the interpretation of time. Time is related to the subject of a statement and shows the connection of representation of time and existential characteristics of anything thought to be included in temporal changes.

Download file
Counter downloads: 174

Keywords

время, Аристотель, Кант, Хайдеггер, инструментализм

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kulikov Sergey B.Tomsk State Pedagogical Universitykulikovsb@tspu.edu.ru
Всего: 1

References

Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время / пер. с нем. В.В. Бибихина. Харьков : Фолио, 2003.
Аристотель. Физика / пер. с древнегреч. В.П. Карпова // Соч. : в 4 т. М., 1981. Т. 3. С. 59-262.
Bostock D. Aristotle's Account of Time // Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle's Physics. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 2006. P. 136-157.
Coope Ur. Time for Aristotle: Physics IV.10-14. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 2005.
Roark T. Aristotle on Time: A Study of the Physics. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Penrose R. The Question of Cosmic Censorship // Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy. 1999. Vol. 20, Iss. 3-4. P. 233-248.
Ньютон И. Математические начала натуральной философии / пер. с лат. А.Н. Крылова. М. : Наука, 1989.
LightmanA. The Accidental Universe: The World You Thought You Knew. New York : Pantheon Books, 2013.
Молчанов Ю.Б. Четыре концепции времени в философии и физике. М. : Наука, 1977.
Кант И. Критика чистого разума / пер. с нем. Н.О. Лосского с вар. пер. на рус. и европ. языки. М. : Наука, 1998.
Аристотель. Политика / пер. с древнегреч. С. Жебелева // Соч. : в 4 т. М., 1983. Т. 4. С. 376-644.
Momigliano A. Time in Ancient Historiography // History and Theory. 1966. Vol. 6. Beiheft 6: History and the Concept of Time. P. 1-23.
Собко Р.В. Богословие как историософская схема: рассуждения о тринитарной концепции Иоахима Флорского // Вестник МГОУ. Серия: Философские науки. 2011. № 2. С. 110115.
Эйнштейн А. К электродинамике движущихся тел / пер. с нем. под ред. В.К. Фреде-рикса, Д.Д. Иваненко // Эйнштейн А. Собр. науч. тр. : в 4 т. М., 1965. Т. 1. С. 7-35.
Бергсон А. Длительность и одновременность (по поводу теории Эйнштейна) / пер. с фр. А.А. Франковского. Петербург : Academia, 1923.
Августин Аврелий. Исповедь // Творения : в 4 т. Т. 1. : Об истинной религии. С.-Петербург ; Киев, 2000. С. 469-741.
Heidegger M. Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs // Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 20. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1979.
Хайдеггер М. Кант и проблема метафизики / пер. с нем. О.В. Никифорова. М. : Логос, 1997.
 Heidegger's counterargumentation to the Aristotelian interpretation of time and its criticism | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/42/6

Heidegger's counterargumentation to the Aristotelian interpretation of time and its criticism | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/42/6

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1575