Conceptualisation of the Second Demographic Transition: heuristic potential and limitations of theory | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 43. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/43/12

Conceptualisation of the Second Demographic Transition: heuristic potential and limitations of theory

The concept "Second Demographic Transition" (SDT) plays an important role in the discussion about the demographic future of Europe and draws the attention of many researchers to this transition. The SDT theory was initially formulated by Dirk van de Kaa and Ron Lesthaeghe in 1986. They found that, since the mid-1960s, in many countries of Europe there have been significant changes in fertility and family formation patterns. The emergence of this concept required an explanation of what should be understood as the First Demographic Transition (FDT), since until then such a concept did not exist. One of the topics of the article focuses on the comparison of SDT and FDT, in particular, on the background and factors of these two transitions. The framework of the SDT theory has evolved over time, but its main points have remained unchanged. Th theory suggests a connection between changes in reproductive and matrimonial behaviour, living arrangements and changes in values - "ideational shift". The forms of marriage and family relations show a new dimension which hardly received attention in former times: the individual and independent choice of the partner, the equality of rights of partners, the importance of a lot of individual characteristics that match individual preferences, etc. The article deals with the idea, the phenomenon, causes and the extent of the universality of the second demographic transition. Despite the fact that the SDT concept is the mainstream conceptual framework of sub-replacement fertility and family changes, there is no consensus on its universality and sufficiency. The SDT theory suggests a hypothesis about the reduction of inter-ethnic heterogeneity in European countries through the "standard" sequence of demographic events. Moreover, the supporters of the theory emphasise the similarity in family formation and partnership behaviour in some industrialised countries of Asia, the Far East and Latin America, and predict the similar individual choice of living arrangements patterns. Can we find a convergence of marriage and partnership behaviour in different countries during SDT? Will SDT become a worldwide phenomenon (as the First "Classical" Demographic Transition) or will it remain "regionally diversified"? The article attempts to get closer to the answer to these main questions. The SDT theory has not only supporters but also opponents. In this regard, the article presents a critical review of the theory of the Second Demographic Transition.

Download file
Counter downloads: 172

Keywords

values, divergence, convergence, fertility, matrimonial family behaviour, second demographic transition, first demographic transition, demographic theory, ценности, дивергенция, конвергенция, рождаемость, брачно-семейное поведение, второй демографический переход, первый демографический переход, демографическая теория

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Gudkova Tatiana B.Higher School of Economicstbgudkova@hse.ru
Всего: 1

References

Lichter D.T. Integration or fragmentation: Racial diversity and the American future // Demography. 2013. № 50. P. 359-391.
Coleman D.A. Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: A third demographic transition // Population and Development Review. 2006. № 32. P. 401-446.
Billari F.C. Partnership, childbearing and parenting: trends of the 1990s. // M. Macura, A.L. MacDonald, W. Haug (Eds.). The New Demographic Regime. Population Challenges and Policy Responses. 2005. P. 63-94.
Boh K. European Family Life Patterns - A Reappraisal // K. Boh et al. (eds). Changing Patterns of European Family Life: A Comparative Analysis of 14 European Countries, Routledge. London; New York, 1989. Р. 265-298.
KuijstenA.C. Changing family patterns in Europe: A case of divergence? // European Journal of Population. 1996. № 12 (2). P. 115-143.
Mayer K.U. The paradox of global social change and national path dependencies: life course patterns in advanced societies // A.E. Woodward and M. Kohli (eds.). Inclusions-Exclusions. London : Routledge, 2001. P. 89-110.
Lesthaeghe R. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition // Population and Development Review. 2010. № 36 (2). P. 211-251.
Coleman D. Partnership in Europe; its Variety, Trends and Dissolution // Finnish Yearbook of Population Research. 2013. 48. P. 5-49.
Reher D. S. Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts / Population and Development Review. 1998. P. 203-234.
Preston S.H. Changing values and falling birth rates // Population and Development Review 12 (Supp.). 1986. P. 176-195.
Sobotka T. The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe // Demographic Research. 2008. 19(8). P. 171-224.
Lesthaeghe R. The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation // Gender and family change in industrialized countries. 1995. P. 17-62.
Van de Kaa D.J. Is the Second Demographic Transition a useful research concept: Questions and answers // Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. 2004. № 2. P. 4-10.
Вишневский А.Г. Незавершенная демографическая модернизация в России // СПЕРО. 2009. № 10. С. 55-82.
Caldwell J.C. Three Fertility Compromises and Two Transitions // Population Research and Policy Review. 2008. № 27. P. 427-446.
Coleman D. Why we don't have to believe without doubting in the «Second Demographic Transition» - some agnostic comments // Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. 2004. № 2. P. 11-24.
Livi Bacci M. Comment: desired family size and the future course of fertility // Population and Development Review. 2001. № 27. P. 282-289.
Billari F.C., Liefbroer A.C. Is the Second Demographic Transition a useful concept for demography? Introduction to a debate // Vienna yearbook of population research. 2004. № 2. P. 1-3.
Van de Kaa D.J. Anchored Narratives: The Story and Findings of Half a Century of Research into the Determinants of Fertility // Population Studies. 1996. № 50. P. 389-432.
Маслоу А.Г. Мотивация и личность: пер. с англ. СПб. : Изд. дом «Питер», 2009.
Van de Kaa D.J. Europe's second demographic transition // Population Bulletin. 42(1). The Population Reference Bureau. Washington, 1987. 57 p.
Инглхарт Р., Вельцель К. Модернизация, культурные изменения и демократия : Последовательность человеческого развития. М. : Новое изд-во, 2011. 464 с.
Sobotka T., Beaujouan E. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe // Population and Development Review. 2014. 40(3). P. 391-419.
Goldstein J.R., Sobotka T., Jasilioniene A. The end of lowest-low fertility? // Population and Development Review. 2009. № 35(4). P. 663-700.
Вишневский А.Г. Место исторического знания в изучении прокреативного поведения в СССР // Избранные демографические труды. М., 2005. Т. 2. С. 257-296.
Aries P. Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West // Population and Development Review. 1980. С. 645-650.
Lesthaeghe R. The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014. № 111 (51). P. 18112-18115.
Van de Kaa D.J. The Idea of a Second Demographic Transition in Industrialized Countries. Paper presented at the Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security. Tokyo, Japan, 2002. 34 p.
Van de Kaa D.J. Demographic transitions // Zeng Y., ed. Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). Demography, 1. Oxford : Eolss Publishers, 2010. P. 65-103.
Лакатос И. Фальсификация и методология научно-исследовательских программ. М. : Медиум, 1995.
Van de Kaa D.J. Emerging Issues in Demographic Research for Contemporary Europe // Population Studies. 1991. № 45 (1). P. 189-206.
Keyfitz N. How do we know the facts of demography? // Population and Development Review. 1975. P. 267-288.
Vance R. B. Is theory for demographers? // Social Forces. 1952. № 31. P. 9-13.
 Conceptualisation of the Second Demographic Transition: heuristic potential and limitations of theory | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 43. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/43/12

Conceptualisation of the Second Demographic Transition: heuristic potential and limitations of theory | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 43. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/43/12

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2051