Pain: medical history and premises of sociological analysis
For a long time, pain, like other issues related to the corporeality of a person, was beyond the sphere of sociological interest. Since the second half of the 20th century, the situation has been changing, and the established models of the "disembodied" actor have been gradually denied. It is still too early to claim that sociology of pain is an established domain of research, but Mark Zborowski's People in Pain (1969) made a substantive contribution into studying pain as a complex phenomenon embracing physiological as well as psychological, cognitive and social aspects. Despite the methodological and conceptual differences, sociological approaches to the study of pain share a common feature that is a protest against the reductionist, unidimensional approach to pain that obtained a dominant position in the scientific discourse due to medical influence. Sociologists highlight that pain is always subjective, while medical representatives, being the main source of a "valid" knowledge of pain, are inclined to leave this subjectivity beyond their analysis. The article examines how the attitude towards pain in medicine has changed with time in order to understand what the prerequisites for the appearance of pain issues in the focus of sociological analysis were. The achievements of medicine promoted the transition from treating pain as an independent entity, conceptualised in terms of the mythological, the supernatural, to considering it only as a concomitant sign of physiological damage, without any independent value. The development of medical technologies has made it possible to proceed to such methods of diagnosing, in which patient's complaints become irrelevant, and it is possible to reach the disease "directly" without resorting to subjective factors. This reduction of personality to an organism as a mechanism that went out of order caused a certain protest from sociologists and promoted the increased interest in studying such issues. Meanwhile, at the moment in medical science too there have been significant shifts in the study of pain: first, it regained its independent status, which was reflected in the formation of a specific domain of pain studies and the creation of a specialised international association, and, second, an evidence base was accumulated that confirms that the relationship between the pain stimulus and pain as such is far from unambiguous and depends on many factors, including social ones.
Keywords
боль,
социология боли,
социология медицины,
история медицины,
pain,
sociology of pain,
sociology of medicine,
history of medicineAuthors
Zakutina Evgeniya S. | Higher School of Economics | es.podstreshnaya@gmail.com |
Всего: 1
References
Turk D.C., Flor H. Chronic Pain: A behavioral perspective // Gatchel K.J., Turk D.C., eds. Psychosocial Factors in Pain: Critical Perspectives. New York : Guilford Press, 1999. Р. 18-34.
WittgensteinL. Philosophical Investigations. Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 592 с.
Engel G.L. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine // Science. 1977. № 196. Р. 129-136.
Flor H., Hermann C. Biopsychosocial models of pain // Dworkin R.H., Breitbart W., eds. Psychosocial aspects of pain: a handbook for healthcare providers. Progress in Pain Research and Management. Vol. 27. Seattle: IASP Press, 2004. Р. 47-75.
Morris D.B. The Culture of Pain. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1991. 354 р.
Davis B.D. Caring for People in Pain. New York : Routledge, 2002. 268 р.
Lascaratou C. The Language of Pain: Expression Or Description? Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing, 2007. 264 р.
Goffman E. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York : Anchor Books / Doubleday, 1961. 1st ed. 386 р.
Kleinmann A., Brodwyn P.E., Good B.J. et al. Pain as human experience: An introduction // Delvecchio Good M., Brodwyn P.E., Good B.J., Kleinmann A., eds. Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1992. Р. 1-14.
Zborowski M. People in pain. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1969. 274 р.
Encandela J.A. Social science and the study of pain since Zborowski: a need for a new agenda // Social Science & Medicine. 1993. № 36 (6). Р. 783-791.
Callister L.C. Cultural influences on pain perceptions and behaviors // Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2003. № 15 (3). Р. 207-211.
Bendelow G., Williams S. Pain and the mind-body dualism: a sociological approach // Body & Society. 1995. № 1 (2). Р. 83-103.
Kugelmann R. Complaining about chronic pain // Social Science & Medicine. 1999. N 49 (12). Р. 1663-1676.
Turner B.S. Regulating Bodies: Essays in Medical Sociology. London : Routledge, 2002. 290 р.
Porter R. Oh, My Aching Back // London Review of Books. 1995. № 17 (21). Р. 9-11.
Eccleston C., Crombez G. Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the inter-ruptive function of pain // Psychological Bulletin. 1999. № 125. P. 356-366.
Романов П.В., Ярская-Смирнова Е.Р. Социология тела и социальной политики // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2004. № 7 (2). С. 115-137.
IASP Taxonomy [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.iasp-pain.org/Taxonomy (дата обращения: 15.12.2017).
Linton S.J. Understanding pain for better clinical practice // Pain Research and Clinical Management Series. Vol. 16. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005. 180 р.
Basbaum A.I. Unlocking the Secrets of Pain: The Science // 1988 Medical and Health Annual. Chicago : Encyclopedia Britannica, 1988. Р. 84-103.
Bonica J.J. Advances in Neurology. New York: Raven Press, 1974. 850 р.
Bendelow G. Pain perceptions, emotions and gender // Sociology of Health & Illness. 1993. 15 (3). Р. 273-294.
Albrecht G., Sharon L. S. (ed). Encyclopedia of disability. Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.
Giordano J. (ed.). Maldynia: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Illness of Chronic Pain. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2016. 280 р.
Jackson J.E. Stigma, liminality, and chronic pain: Mind-body borderlands // American Ethnologist. 2005. № 32 (3). Р. 332-353.
Boddice R.G. Pain and emotion in modern history. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 284 р.
Hammond W.A. On Certain Conditions of Nervous Derangement. New York : G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1881. 256 р.
ReyR. The History of Pain. London : Harvard University Press, 1995. 408 р.
Goldberg D.S. The Bioethics of Pain Management: Beyond Opioids. New York : Routledge, 2014. 164 р.
Foucault M. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 / ed. by C. Gordon. New York : Pantheon, 1980. 270 р.
IllichI. Medical nemesis. New York : Pantheon Books, 1976. 201 р.
Melzack R, Wall P.D. Pain mechanisms: a new theory // SCIENCE. 1965. 150 (3699). Р. 971978.
Sherrington C. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 1906. 412 р.
Tsui S.L., Chen P.P., Ng K.F.J. (ed.). Pain Medicine: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Vol. 1. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2010. 648 р.
Toellner R. Die Umbewertung des Schmerzes im 17. Jahrhundert in ihren Voraussetzungen und Folgen // Medizinhistoriches Journal. 1971. Т. 6, № 1. Р. 36-44.
Scheper-Hughes N., Lock M.M. The mindful body: A prolegomenon to future work in medical anthropology // Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1987. Р. 6-41.
Schwartz D.P., Parris W.C.V. Historical Perspectives on Pain Management // Contemporary Issues in Chronic Pain Management / ed. by W.C.V. Parris. Nashville: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Р. 1-9.