Electoral absenteeism in the context of contemporary socio-political transformations | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 43. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/43/16

Electoral absenteeism in the context of contemporary socio-political transformations

The authors analyse the causes, manifestations and possible ways of overcoming and reducing the scale of absenteeism as a phenomenon in the context of modern socio-political processes and transformations. The dominant characteristic of current elections is the widespread repudiation of the electoral system, political campaigns, parties and candidates. The authors reveal the essence of absenteeism, illustrate the forms of its manifestation, identify the reasons for political absenteeism as a personal position of a citizen, a political phenomenon and an integral part of the electoral and political processes. They also give a detailed typology of factors of absenteeism. The nature of absenteeism is revealed in the article in a multifaceted way: as an individual's political position (the aspect of individual choice), as a social phenomenon (an indicator of the level of involvement in politics of population groups) and as an inevitable element of the electoral process (reasons preventing the expression of the will of citizens). There is a methodology for analysing the indices and the voter confidence factor for candidates and political parties. The effects and consequences of the expansion of models of consumer and mass societies in hybrid and transitional regimes are considered. It is argued that in modern conditions it is necessary to link the solution of the problem of absenteeism with a broader cultural and identity problem, with a more complete description of the changes in the nature and status of various electoral groups. It is noted that it is necessary to link all kinds of decisions with a qualitatively new understanding of democracy (electronic, network, etc.). It is also promising to link the solution of the problem of absenteeism with the idea of a multi-level identity (the Swiss philosopher Denis de Rougemont) - local, regional, national, global-confessional - which, in the authors' opinion, is able to effectively solve the problem of political participation in multi-component societies, giving democracy (including in its electoral form) a new stimulus to development. To solve the problem of absenteeism, a new model of the political market is obviously proposed, its demonopolised model assuming that it is not dominated by the "seller" (the community of professional politicians) but by the "buyer" of such services - voters and all citizens acting on the basis of a developed feedback from the institutions of power and government. The article is a theoretical and methodological one.

Download file
Counter downloads: 269

Keywords

абсентеизм, избирательный процесс, политический абсентеизм, absenteeism, electoral process, political absenteeism

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Biryukov Sergei V.School of Advanced International and Area Studies (SAIAS) of East China Normal Universitybirs.07@mail.ru
Kislyakov Mikhail M.Kemerovo Institute (Branch) of Plekhanov Russian University of Economicsm.kislyakov@mail.ru
Shcheglova Daria V.Voronezh State Universitybruenen@mail.ru
Prokopenko Sergei A.Tomsk Polytechnic Universitysibgp@mail.ru
Всего: 4

References

Ашкеров А.Ю. Экспертократия: управление знаниями. Производство и обращение информации в эпоху ультракапитализма. М. : Европа, 2009. 132 с.
Гришин Н.В. Избирательная система как институт артикуляции политических интересов общества // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. 2013. № 2. С. 42-47.
Гудина Ю.В. Активность российских избирателей: теоретические модели и практика // Политические исследования. 2003. № 1. С. 112-123.
Анисимова О.В. Социально-психологический анализ проблемы абсентеизма [Электронный ресурс] // Изв. Сарат. ун-та. Нов. сер. Сер. Акмеология образования. Психология развития. 2009. № 1. Электрон. версия печат. публ. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-psihologicheskiy-analiz-problemy-absenteizma (дата обращения: 20.04.2017).
Бушенева Ю.И. Абсентеизм как фактор избирательного процесса в современной России : дис.. канд. полит. наук. СПб., 2007. 180 с.
Lazer D., Rubineau B., Chetkovich C., Katz N., Neblo M. The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes // Political Communication. 2010. Vol. 27, Iss. 3. P. 248-274.
Морозова О.С. Абсентеизм как тип электорального поведения [Электронный ресурс] // Электронный научно-практический журнал «Культура и образование». 2013. № 2. Электрон. дан. Доступ из науч. электрон. б-ки „eLIBRARY.RU".
Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited // Sociological Theory. 1983. Vol. 1. P. 201-233.
Franko W.W., KellyN.J., Witko C. Class Bias in Voter Turnout, Representation, and Income Inequality // Perspectives on Politics. 2016. Vol. 14, Iss. 2. P. 351-368.
Sorensen Rune J. The Impact of State Television on Voter Turnout // British Journal of Political Science. 2014. Vol. 4. P. 1-22.
Matsusaka J.G., McCarty, N.M. 2001 Political Resource Allocation: Benefits and Costs of Voter Initiatives // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. Vol. 17, Iss. 2. P. 413-448.
Matsusaka J.G. Public Choice / University of Southern California, Los Angeles: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. p. 91-117.
Slater D. Rev. op. : Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010 // Perspectives on Politics. 2011. Vol. 9, Iss. 2. P. 385-388.
Case W. Southeast Asia's Hybrid Regimes: When Do Voters Change Them? // Journal of East Asian Studies. 2005 August. Vol. 5, Iss. 2. P. 215-237.
Diamond L.J. Thinking About Hybrid Regimes // Journal of Democracy. Vol. 13, № 2. 2002. P. 21-35.
Frombgen E. Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyz-stan // Perspectives on Politics. 2007. Vol. 5. P. 666-668.
Robertson G.B. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes. Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge University Press, 2011. 285 р.
Инглхарт Р. Постмодерн: меняющиеся ценности и изменяющиеся общества // Политические исследования. 1997. № 4. С. 6-32.
Campbell A., Gurin G., Miller W.E. The Voter Decides. N. Y. : Row, Peterson and Company, 1954. 242 р.
Lasarsfeld P.F., Berelson B.R., Gaudet H. The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. N. Y., 1948. 178 p.
Lipset S.M., Rokkan S. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments // The West European Party System. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1990. P. 91-111.
 Electoral absenteeism in the context of contemporary socio-political transformations | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 43. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/43/16

Electoral absenteeism in the context of contemporary socio-political transformations | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 43. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/43/16

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2051