The right to the city in the paradigm of mobility
The article discusses the epistemological interconnections of such concepts as the right to the city, mobile citizenship, urban mobility and universal design. The problem of accessibility of and barriers in the urban environment has become extremely important today for the researchers, since it is directly related to the issues of the quality of life, overcoming the marginalization of millions of ordinary Russian citizens. The authors emphasise that universal design is becoming a key condition for improving the accessibility of the environment, public goods and services for all people. The right to the city is considered in terms of freedom of movement, accessibility of socially significant objects, including urban green areas, as well as in the perspective of mobilizing a civic position. The mobile citizenship of such vulnerable groups as people with disabilities, migrants, women and other categories of population, is associated with their right to accessible city routes and inclusive parks. Focus on the accessibility of urban green spaces reveals the growing complexity of urban life. The problems of equal access of people to safe and inclusive urban green spaces are presented here on the basis of the materials of the World Health Organization and empirical data obtained through walk along. It is shown that the turn to the new urbanism caused the emergence of the walk along method in such a theoretical perspective that considers the right to the city in the process of interaction of city authorities, designers, architects, builders and ordinary people, old-timers and newcomers, everyday users who make changes in cities. The cognitive potential of the walk along interview method is shown not only in the context of social sciences. Its applicability in urban planning is also emphasized. As the interviews showed, social citizenship is faced with obstacles in practice, and one should think about factors that facilitate orientation, mobility, security, improving the accessibility of urban space.
Keywords
право на город,
мобильность,
гражданство,
уязвимые группы,
rights to the city,
accessible environment,
mobility,
citizenship,
vulnerable groups,
urban green zonesAuthors
Yarskaya-Smirnova Valentina N. | Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov | jarskaja@mail.ru |
Yarskaia-Smirnova Elena R. | Higher School of Economics | eiarskaia@hse.ru; elena.iarskaia@gmail.com |
Всего: 2
References
Харви Д. Социальная справедливость и город. М. : НЛО, 2018. 440 с.
Урри Дж. Мобильность и близость // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 2. С. 3-14.
Романов П.В., Ярская-Смирнова Е.Р. Тело и дискриминация: инвалидность, тендер и гражданство в постсоветском кино // Неприкосновенный запас. 2011. № 2(76). С. 65-80. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2011/2/ro6.html (дата обращения: 24.07.2018).
Phillips S.D. Disability and mobile citizenship in postsocialist Ukraine. Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 2010. 318 с.
Романов П.В., Ярская-Смирнова Е.Р. Политика инвалидности : социальное гражданство инвалидов в современной России. Саратов : Науч. книга, 2006. 260 с.
Наберушкина Э.К. Инвалиды в большом городе: проблемы социального гражданства. М. : Вариант, 2012. 334 с.
Конвенция ООН о правах инвалидов. Принята резолюцией 61/106 Генеральной Ассамблеи от 13 декабря 2006 г. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/disa-bility.shtml (дата обращения: 24.07.2018).
Минтруд России подготовил законопроект о сопровождаемом содействии занятости инвалидов. Минтруд России, 03.05.2017. URL: https://rosmintrud.ru/social/invalid-defence/375 (дата обращения: 24.07.2018).
Imrie R., Hall P. Inclusive design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments. London : Spon Press, 2001. 187 p.
Jones P. Situating universal design architecture: designing with whom? // Disability Rehabilitation. 2014. Vol. 36(16). P. 1369-1374.
Urban green spaces and health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016. 91 p.
Green Space Interventions and Health A review of impacts and effectiveness. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2017. 203 p.
Verd J.M., PorcelS. An Application of Qualitative Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in the Field of Urban Sociology Using ATLAS.ti: Uses and Reflections // Forum: qualitative social research. 2012. Vol. 13. № 2. Art. 14 - May 2012. URL: http://www.qualitative-research.net/in-dex.php/fqs/article/view/1847/3373 (дата обращения: 24.07.2018).
Kusenbach M. Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool // Ethnography. 2003. Vol. 4, № 3. P. 455-485.
Evans J., Jones Ph. The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place// Applied Geography. 2011. № 31. P. 849-858.
Kochan D. (Re)placing migrants' mobility: A multi-method approach to integration space and mobility in the study of migration // Migration studies, 2016. Vol. 4, № 2. P. 215-37.
Carpiano R.M. Come take a walk with me: The "Go-Along" interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being // Health & Place, 2009. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 263-272.
LidI.M., Solvang P.K. (Dis)ability and the experience of accessibility in the urban environment // ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 181-194.
Амин Э., ТрифтН. Внятность повседневного города // Логос. 2002. № 3-4. С. 209-234.
Парк Р. Город как социальная лаборатория // Социологическое обозрение. 2002. Т. 2, № 3. С. 3-12.
Вирт Л. Урбанизм как образ жизни / пер. В.Г. Николаева // Вирт Л. Избранные работы по социологии. М., 2005. С. 93-118.
Merry S.E. Urban Anthropology // ed. Th. Barfield. The Dictionary of Anthropology. Black-well publishers, 1997. P. 479-480.
Ярская-СмирноваЕ.Р., Романов П.В. Социальная антропология. Ростов н/Д : Феникс, 2004. 387 с.
ЛефеврА. Производство пространства. М. : Strelka Press, 2015. 432 с.