Historical ontology as a problem | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 45. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/45/20

Historical ontology as a problem

The article deals with the historical interrelation of ontology and epistemology. The mechanisms of the transition from the history of epistemology to historical epistemology are discussed. It is shown that the transition from the history of ontology to historical ontology cannot be explained by analogy with the transition from the history of epistemology to historical epistemology. It is suggested that when epistemology becomes historical, it re-poses the question of realism, but it cannot answer it, remaining within its own boundaries. A number of discourses, which position themselves as historical ontology, are considered. It is shown that revolutionary changes in structures of knowledge and the transition from one system of a reflexive justification of knowledge to another reveal gaps between the conceptual and the conceptual. It is shown that these gaps contain an unavoidable ontological problem. It is asserted that if we have an idea of these discontinuities, then we have a representation and formulate knowledge about something other than knowledge itself, and thus we go beyond the boundaries of epistemology.

Download file
Counter downloads: 129

Keywords

историческая онтология, историческая эпистемология, философская история науки, трансцендентальное обоснование познания, реализм, historical ontology, historical epistemology, history and philosophy of science, transcendental justification of knowledge, realism

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Stoliarova Olga E.Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciencesolgastoliarova@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1996. 212 p.
Хюбнер К. Критика научного разума. М. : ИФРАН, 1994. 326 с.
Daston L., Galison P. Objectivity. New York : Zone Books, 2007. 501 p.
Койре А. От замкнутого мира к бесконечной Вселенной. М. : Логос, 2001. 288 с.
Лавджой А. Великая цепь бытия. История идеи. М. : Дом интеллектуальной книги, 2001. 376 с.
Гайденко П.П. История новоевропейской философии в ее связи с наукой. М. : Университетская книга, 2000. 455 с.
Daston L. Historical Epistemology // Questions of Evidence / ed. by J. Chandler, A.I. Davidson, and H.D. Harootunian. University of Chicago Press, 1994. P. 282-289.
Renn J. Historical Epistemology and Interdisciplinarity // Physics, Philosophy and the Scientific Community / Ed. by K. Gavroglu, J. Stachel, and M. W. Wartofsky. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1995. P. 241-251.
Hacking I. Historical Meta-Epistemology // Wahrheit und Geschichte / ed. by W. Carl and L. Daston. Gottingen : Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999. P. 53-77.
Касавин И.Т. Эпистемология и историческое сознание // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2005. Т. 3, № 1. С. 5-14.
Gingras Y. Naming Without Necessity: On the Genealogy and Uses of the Label "Historical Epistemology" // Revue de Synthese. 2010. Vol. 131. P. 439-454.
Rheinberger H.-J. On Historicizing Epistemology. An Essay. Stanford University Press, 2010. 126 p.
Feest U., Sturm T. What (Good) Is Historical Epistemology? // Erkenntnis. 2011. Vol. 75, № 3. P. 285-302.
StroudB. Epistemology, the History of Epistemology, Historical Epistemology // Erkenntnis. 2011. Vol. 75, № 3. P. 495-503.
Sturm T. Historical Epistemology or History of Epistemology? The Case of the Relation Between Perception and Judgment // Erkenntnis. 2011. Vol. 75, № 3. P. 303-324.
Nasim O. Was ist historische Epistemologie? // Nach Feierabend / ed. by M. Hagner and C. Hirschi. Zurich, Berlin : Diaphanes, 2013. S. 123-144.
Гавриленко С.М. Историческая эпистемология: Зона неопределенности и пространство теоретического воображения // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2017. Т. 52, № 2. С. 20-28.
Шиповалова Л.В. Стоит ли науку мыслить исторически? // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2017. Т. 51, № 1. С. 18-28.
Arabatzis T. Toward a Historical Ontology? // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2003. Vol. 34. P. 431-442.
Фуко М. Что такое Просвещение? // Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть : Избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью. М., 2002. С. 335-359.
Кант И. Ответ на вопрос: Что такое Просвещение? / Собр. соч.: в 6 т. М., 1966. Т. 6. С. 25-35.
Arabatzis T. Can a Historian of Science Be a Scientific Realist? // Philosophy of Science. 2001. Vol. 68, № 53. P. 531-541.
Galison P. Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science // Isis. 2008. Vol. 99. P. 111124.
Hacking I. Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press, 2002. 288 p.
 Historical ontology as a problem | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 45. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/45/20

Historical ontology as a problem | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2018. № 45. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/45/20

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3822