The Great Second. William Whewell's role in the making of the "philosophy - physics" trading zone | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 47. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/47/6

The Great Second. William Whewell's role in the making of the "philosophy - physics" trading zone

The concept "trading zones" (Peter Galison, Harry Collins) has become a peculiar pattern of a discussion on scientific communication during the past decade. The idea that scientific communication is not only fruitful but also problematic, and needs developing an interdisciplinary language and special mediative activities applies to the description of the situation in the sciences and in the relationship between the science and society as well. The role philosophy can play, the nature of scholarly communication, ways to apply the market metaphor of exchange and trade to its understanding - one should not discuss these issues in general terms only, but consider them in the context of the specific historical and sociological studies of science and technology. The article proposes a reconstruction of a fragment of the history of electrolysis, in which not only the physicist and chemist (Michael Faraday), but also the philosopher of science (W. Whewell) plays an unexpected role. It is the philosopher's ability to create a terminological innovation that turns out to be a sign of the trading zone formation, but trading here is to be understood as a special gift, and this contributes to the argument that knowledge cannot be bought, it can only be shared. The same case acts as the basis for the hypothesis about a philosopher's mediative role in science.

Download file
Counter downloads: 165

Keywords

философия науки, электролиз, зоны обмена, медиация в науке, Фа-радей, Хьюэлл, philosophy of science, electrolysis, trading zone, mediation in science, Faraday, Whewell

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kasavin Ilya T.Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgoroditkasavin@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Избранные сочинения. М., 1986. Т. 3. 639 с.
Антоновский А.Ю. Коммуникация как эпистемическая проблема // Epistemology and philosophy of science. 2016. № 1. С. 5-24.
Столярова О.Е. Следует ли понимать науки вне истории? // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2018. Т. 51, № 1. С. 47-51.
Лекторский В.А. и др. Обсуждение книги академика В.С. Степина «Цивилизация и культура» // Вопросы философии. 2013, № 12. С. 3-47.
Whewell W., D.D. Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. An account of his writings with selections from his literary and scientific correspondence. By I. Todhunter, M.A. F.R.S. Honorary fellow of St John's College. Vol. 2. Cambridge : Macmillan and Co. 1876. 439 p.
Горохов В.Г. Технические науки: история и теория. М. : Логос, 2012.
Faraday M. Letter to William Whewell, 15 May 1834 // A. Frank, J.L. James (eds.). The Correspondence of Michael Faraday. Vol. 2. London : The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2013.
Faraday M. Experimental Researches in chemistry, 5th and 7th series, PhilTrans. 1833. P. 675-710; 1834. P. 77-122.
Snyder L.J. The Philosophical Breakfast Club: Four Remarkable Men who Transformed Science and Changed the World. Broadway Books, 2011.
Snyder L.J. Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Oesper R.E., Speter M. The Faraday-Whewell Correspondence Concerning Electro-Chemical Terms // The Scientific Monthly. Vol. 45, № 6 (Dec., 1937). P. 535-546.
Ross S. Nineteenth-Century Attitudes : Men of Science. Kluwer Dordrecht, 1991. 501 p.
Frank A.J.L. James, Michael Faraday's First Law of Electrochemistry. How Context Develops New Knowledge // Electrochemistry, Past and Present, ACS Symposium Series. 1989. Vol. 390. Washington : American Chemical Society. P. 32-49.
Бараш Р.Э. и др. Наука Макса Вебера: рецепция и современность // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2018. Т. 55, № 4. С. 174-188.
Whewell W. On the Employment of Notation in Chemistry // The Journal of the Royal Institution of Great Britain. 1831. Vol. 1. P. 437-453.
Whewell W. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. P. 1. Cambridge : John W. Parker, 1840.
Heilbron J.L. Coming to terms: Caloric, cathode, curium and quark-coinage from the mint of science // Nature (published 7 February 2002). 415 (6872). P. 585.
Antonovskiy A.Y. Science as a Social subsystem // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 7. P. 158171.
Касавин И.Т. К эпистемологии коммуникации: сила и слабость аналитического оптимизма // Вопросы философии. 2014. № 7. С. 39-49.
Хьюэлл У. Философия индуктивных наук, основанная на их истории. М. : Кнорус, 2016. 504 с.
 The Great Second. William Whewell's role in the making of the

The Great Second. William Whewell's role in the making of the "philosophy - physics" trading zone | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 47. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/47/6

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1758