The Life Course of the New Working-Class Youth: The Reality and Normative Patterns | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 49. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/49/11

The Life Course of the New Working-Class Youth: The Reality and Normative Patterns

The subject domain of the study is life patterns and strategies of the Russian new working-class youth. Exploring the relationship between the new working-class studies and life course studies, this research combines the consideration of a life course as a structurally organized integrity with a phenomenological perspective on the study of life strategies. The notion of the “new working class” and the criteria for its definition have been proposed and substantiated. Biographical indepth interviews of 31 young working-class representatives and a mass poll of 1532 respondents were used to focus on the implementation of class normative patterns and to determine their consistency with individual life strategies and with means by which these patterns are constructed and legitimized in the context of the structural strengths and constraints of society with an extremely high degree of social inequalities and the precarity of youth labour. To disclose the dominant normative patterns that structure the life course of the Russian working-class youth as the main research question of this article, the author considered the main life course trajectories (education, family and career) and sought to measure and understand the following aspects: normative temporal limitations and the preferred sequence of the main role transitions (finishing education, full-time job, first career promotion, marriage, having a first child); the correlation between the real and preferable time and sequence of role transitions; the preservation of traditional class distinctions within life course normative patterns or their inversion, differentiation or displacing by other patterns and values during the period of emerging adulthood. The study has shown the remaining significance and value of the traditional life course structures while current social conditions (wages, mortgage rate, the access to higher education and its quality, the interrelation between education and market requirements, etc.) do not allow to fulfil this life strategy any longer. The trendy normative patterns of the middle-class youth (refusal from institutional education, freelance jobs) are used as tools legitimating the existing class barriers, lack of access to education, fundamental lack of trust to major social institutions. Due to these reasons, young workers choose the adaptation and survival life strategies which restrict their professional and cultural potential realization and create a negative social mood.

Download file
Counter downloads: 251

Keywords

рабочий класс, рабочая молодежь, жизненный путь, жизненные стратегии, working class, working-class youth, life course, life strategies

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Gavrilyuk Tatiana V.Industrial University of Tyumentv_gavrilyuk@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Balibar E., Wallerstein I. Race, nation, class. Ambiguous Identities. London ; New York : Verso, 1991.
Boltanski L., Chiapello E. The new spirit of capitalism. London ; New York : Verso, 2007.
Тощенко Ж.Т. Прекариат: от протокласса к новому классу. М. : Наука, 2018.
Global Wealth Databook // Credit Suisse Research institute. URL: https://publications.credit-suisse.com/?referralUrl=http://publications.creditsuisse.com/index.cfm/publikationen-shop/research-institute/global-wealth-databook-2018-en/ (дата обращения: 17.12.2018).
Bennet T., Savage M., Silva E., Warde A., Gayo-Cal М., Wright D. Culture, Class, Distinction. London : Routledge, 2009.
Shalev M. Class Divisions among Women // Politics & Society. 2008. № 36 (3). P. 421-444.
Linkon S.L., Russo J. Twenty years of working-class studies: Tensions, values, and core questions // Journal of Working-Class Studies. 2016. Vol. 1, is. 1. P. 4-13.
Zweig M. The working-class majority. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, 2000.
Jones O. Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class. London : Verso, 2012.
Savage M. Class analysis and social transformation. Buckingham : Open University Press, 2000.
Заславская Т.И. Социальная структура современного российского общества // Общественные науки и современность. 1997. № 2. С. 5-23.
Карханова Т.М., Бессокирная Г.П., Большакова О.А. Труд и досуг рабочих: программа, инструментарий и некоторые предварительные результаты повторного исследования // Институт cоциологии РАН. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=3224 (дата обращения: 17.12.2018).
Jackson P.B., Berkowitz A. The structure of the life course: gender and racioethnic variations in the occurrence and sequencing of role transitions // The Structure of the Life Course: Standardized? Individualized? Differentiated? Advances in Life Course Research. 2005. Vol. 9. P. 55-90.
Tolson A. The limits of masculinity. London : Tavistock, 1977.
Показатели рынка жилищного (ипотечного жилищного) кредитования // Центральный банк Российской Федерации. URL: http://cbr.ru/statistics/pdko/Mortgage/ (дата обращения: 17.12.2018).
Гаврилюк Т.В. Социальная мобильность и образ будущего молодежи в биографических нарративах успешности // Гаврилюк В.В., Мехришвили Л.Л., Скок Н.И., Гаврилюк Т.В., Маленков В.В. Особенности социальной мобильности молодежи XXI века. Тюмень : ТИУ, 2016. С. 8-54.
 The Life Course of the New Working-Class Youth: The Reality and Normative Patterns | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 49. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/49/11

The Life Course of the New Working-Class Youth: The Reality and Normative Patterns | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 49. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/49/11

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1311