Political Marketing: The Modernization of the Concept, Its Methodological and Politico-Technological Bases | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 50. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/50/16

Political Marketing: The Modernization of the Concept, Its Methodological and Politico-Technological Bases

The article is devoted to modern approaches to the study of political marketing, including the analysis of current political technologies, as well as the opportunities and limitations associated with their implementation. Such technologies are of particular relevance in the political process of post-modernity described in the categories of hierarchy, performativity, contextuality, discreteness and simulation. According to the authors, political marketing today is increasingly becoming an object of interdisciplinary research, in particular, it is actively considered from the point of view of synergy (the general theory of self-organization). The authors conclude that currently there is an active update of the main campaigns and concepts of political marketing. Patterns found in the analysis from the point of view of the system-synergistic activity of a modern changeable and non-linear context within which political marketing strategies are implemented deserve separate consideration: (1) The power of the administrative resource and the variety of informal contacts and connections among the subjects of political marketing do not always ensure the successful implementation of political marketing strategies in a changing society. (2) Of particular importance in this situation are the "point-like" measures of influence on the imbalanced politicians and the public space when, to achieve the goal, the deliberate and skillful nudging of an unstable system that is ready for profound changes (public sphere, public opinion, electorate's sentiment) in the direction necessary for political actors is required rather than a massive intervention. (3) Political marketing is effective when the infrastructure of the influence of the power or of powerless political actors is consolidated, that is, when all resources (political, economic, symbolic capitals) are brought together and work on a single task (electoral, political, administrative). (4) The condition for a successful use of political marketing is reliance on soft power technology. An attractive and consistent image of political power, consistently fixed in the minds of potential voters and in public opinion, affirmed within the public sphere using a symbolic capital, is needed. According to the authors, the key conditions for the effectiveness of political marketing technologies are, respectively: (1) the timeliness of advocacy impacts (political marketing actors need to be proactive in modeling the desired state of public opinion on significant issues); (2) the complex and systemic impact on the opinions of potential voters, its linking with a wide range of problems that really concern the latter; (3) the adequacy and proportionality of the implemented marketing effects of the current social and political situation and the structure of the political moment; (4) the density and intensity of marketing influences, their focus on certain problem situations and reference groups that allow changing the popular mood and the political situation among potential voters in relatively short periods of time by displacing undesirable opinions and attitudes to the periphery of the public space; (5) the ability to create, reproduce and relay non-contradictory political discourses associated with value ideas shared by potential voters; (6) the clear articulation of the position of a political actor implementing marketing strategies on contemporary challenges and problems, the putting forward of a positive and constructive alternative to current challenges and problems, policies, strategies and approaches.

Download file
Counter downloads: 142

Keywords

политический маркетинг, политические технологии, сети, симуляция, маркетинговый анализ и синтез в политической сфере, синергетика, political marketing, political technologies, networks, simulation, synergetics, marketing analysis and synthesis in political sphere

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Biryukov Sergei V.Center for Russian Studies of East China Normal Universitybirs.07@mail.ru
Kislyakov Mikhail M.Kemerovo Institute (Branch) of Plekhanov Russian University of Economicsm.kislyakov@mail.ru
Chirun Sergey N.Kemerovo State UniversitySergii-Tsch@mail.ru
Всего: 3

References

Матвейчев О.А. Сумма политтехнологий. М. : Эксмо, 2013. 640 с.
John P. Analysing Public Policy. Continuum, 1998. 233 p.
Bourdieu P. Propos sur la champ politique. Lion : Press Universitaires de Lion, 2000. 112 p.
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age. Economy, Society, and Culture. 2nd ed. with a New Preface ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 656 p. Vol. 1.
Шмидт Э., Коэн Д. Новый цифровой мир. Как технологии меняют жизнь людей, модели бизнеса и понятие государств. М. : Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2013. 368 c.
Анхольт С., Хильдрет Д. Бренд Америка: мать всех брендов. М.: Добрая книга, 2010. 232 с.
Бернейс Э. Инженерия согласия // Полис. 2014. № 4. С. 122-131.
Чирун С.Н., Николаев А.В., Боброва Е.А., Луцык А.С., Шмит Э.О. Взаимодействие с органами региональной власти на примере Кемеровской области: проблемы и технологии // Власть. 2018. Т. 26, № 7. C. 33-38.
Быков И.А. Медиатизация политики в эпоху социальных медиа // Журнал политических исследований. 2017. Т. 1, № 4. С. 15-38.
Мирошиченко И.В. Сетевой ландшафт российской публичной политики. Краснодар : Просвещение-Юг, 2013. 295 с.
Dahlberg S., Holmberg S. Democracy And Bureaucracy: How Their Quality Matters For Popular Satisfaction // West European Politics. 2014. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 515-537.
Чирун С.Н., Будаев А.С., Боброва Е.А. Типология и диагностика эффективности политических сетей: институциональный аспект // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки. РАНХиГСО. Ростов н/Д, 2018. № 1. С. 152-158.
Чирун С.Н., Николаев А.В. Зайцева В.А. Политические технологии в сетевой реальности постмодерна // Власть. 2018. № 3 (26). С. 7-13.
Делёз Ж., Гваттари Ф. Ризома // Тысяча плато. Онлайн-альманах «Восток», 2005.
Bogason P. Public policy and local governance: Institutions in Postmodern Society. Cheltenham ; Northampton, MA, 2000. 208 p.
Отечественные политические технологии в лицах / под ред. С.Н. Чируна. М. : Директ-Медиа, 2018. 332 с.
Ахременко А.С., Локшин И.М., Юрескул Е.А. Экономический рост и выбор политического курса в авторитарных режимах // Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз. 2015. Т. 3, № 78. С. 50-74.
Becker B. Trump's 6 populist positions // Politico. 2016. February 13. URL: https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/donald-trump-working-class-voters-219231 (accessed: 19.01.2019).
Gerson M. Trump is a fraud // Washington Post. 2019. 28 January.
Werly R. La drole de campagne d'Emmanuel Macron // Le Temps. 2016. 4 octobre. URL: https://www.letemps.ch/monde/drole-campagne-demmanuel-macron (date d'accees: 19.01.2019).
Mader С. Macron bezahlt jetzt den Preis fur seinen Sieg // Neue Zurcher Zeitung. 2019. Februar 1.
Gifford C. The Making of Eurocentric Britain. Ashgate Publishing, 2014. 208 p.
Гомеров И.Н. Структура и свойства власти. Новосибирск : СибУПК, 2000. 230 c.
Николис Г., Пригожин И. Самоорганизация в неравновесных системах: от диссипатив-ных структур к упорядоченности через флуктуации. М. : Мир, 1979. 512 c.
Фронтир сетевого общества как пространство политического взаимодействия / М.Т. Гандалоева, И.В. Мирошниченко, Е.В. Морозова, Н.В. Плотичкина, Н.А. Рябченко, М.В. Терешина, К.В. Ячменник. Краснодар, 2017. 272 с.
Кисляков М.М. Региональный политический маркетинг как составная часть публичной политики // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Сер. История. Политология. Социология. 2017. № 2. С. 45-48.
Сморгунов Л.В., Шерстобитов А.С. Политические сети. Теория и методы анализа. М. : Аспект-Пресс, 2014. 320 с.
 Political Marketing: The Modernization of the Concept, Its Methodological and Politico-Technological Bases | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 50. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/50/16

Political Marketing: The Modernization of the Concept, Its Methodological and Politico-Technological Bases | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019. № 50. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/50/16

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2438