The “Mad” Scientist: The Shadow Side of Scientific Vocation? | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/55/28

The “Mad” Scientist: The Shadow Side of Scientific Vocation?

This article focuses on the ambivalent perception of scientific vocation in the public mind (illustrated by popular culture). The author suggests and justifies the idea that the dual perception of the scientist and the popularity of the “mad” and “evil” scientist stereotypes in popular culture, especially since the 20th century, have archaic roots. The archaic nature of these stereotypes can be traced to alchemy, searches for physical immortality, etc. Originated from ancient times, the scientific calling comes into conflict with the “intellectualistic rationalization” and “disenchantment” of the world in Western European culture and, as a result, with professionalization as an inevitable element in science as a social institution. At the same time, though, the image of genius scientists who are not dissolved in collective scientific knowledge survives in culture, generating various facets of scientists’ perception. Studies of science communication show that the stereotypes of “mad” and “evil” scientists remain the most popular in literature and media, which can hardly be explained solely by the commercialization of these images. Rather, the popularity of these stereotypes lies in the archaic past: scientists appear as priests, ready to make great sacrifices for the greater good.

Download file
Counter downloads: 98

Keywords

наука и технологии, научное призвание, популяризация науки, безумный ученый, мораль и ученые, science and technology, scientific vocation, science popularization, mad scientist, morality and scientists

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Shibarshina Svetlana V.Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorodsvet.shib@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Вебер М. Наука как призвание и профессия // Избранные произведения. М. : Прогресс, 1990. C. 707-735.
Shapin S. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago, IL : Chicago University Press, 2008. 488 p.
Istvan Z. The Transhumanist Wager. Lexington, KY : Futurity Imagine Media, 2013. 300 p.
Larsen K. Particle Panic! : How Popular Media and Popularized Science Feed Public Fears of Particle Accelerator Experiments. Springer, 2019. 194 p.
Haynes R. From Alchemy to Artificial Intelligence: Stereotypes of the Scientist in Western Literature // Public Understanding of Science. 2003. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 243-253.
Tan A., Jocz J.A., Zhai J. Spiderman and Science: How Students’ Perceptions of Scientists Are Shaped by Popular Media // Public Understanding of Science. 2015. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 520-530.
Whitelegg E., Carr J, Holliman R. Using Creative Media Literacy Skills to Raise Aspirations in STEM. Milton Keynes : The Open University, 2013. 38 p.
Esch M. Make Science into a TV Series // VIEWPOINT_Media Policy. MaxPlanckResearch. 2014. URL: https://www.mpg.de/7426172/W001_Viewpoint_014-018.pdf (accessed: 10. 02.2020)
Finson K. Drawing a Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know after Fifty Years of Drawings // School Science and Mathematics. 2002. Vol. 102, № 7. P. 335-345.
Hobsbawm E.J. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914-1991. New York : Pantheon, 1994. 627 p.
Shibarshina S.V., Maslanov E.V. Science Communication in the Soviet Union: Science as Vocation and Profession // Social Epistemology. 2020. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 174-183.
 The “Mad” Scientist: The Shadow Side of Scientific Vocation? | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/55/28

The “Mad” Scientist: The Shadow Side of Scientific Vocation? | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/55/28

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1380