Conditions of Cognition in the Context of Postmetaphysical Ontology | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 57. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/57/1

Conditions of Cognition in the Context of Postmetaphysical Ontology

The article is devoted to a fundamental cognitive-theoretical problem: the problem of finding the necessary foundations of cognition and identifying conditions that ensure the truth and validity of the results of cognitive activity. In modern epistemology, we can find an ambiguous attitude to this topic. On the one hand, there is a position that proceeds from the fact that the focus on the search for limit conditions that ensure the general validity of the results of cognition is an anachronism. On the other hand, there is a position for which the orientation towards the search for the necessary conditions of cognition remains constitutive for the self-awareness of philosophy as such. The author answers the question of how justified the use of the concept of general significance of knowledge in the context of postmetaphysical ontology is. To solve the problem discussed in the article, the author (1) examines ideas about the foundations of knowledge in classical transcendentalism, (2) indicates the basic principles of postmetaphysical ontology, and (3) discusses the conditions for obtaining universally valid knowledge in the horizon of postmetaphysical ontology. The author establishes that postmetaphysical philosophy proceeds from the thesis of the historicity of our being and thought. Our essential condi-tionality by history is conceived as a necessary premise on the path to knowledge of the truth rather than as an unavoidable restriction. In epistemological terms, this means that any theoretical activity always bears the imprint of the situation in which it is carried out. Also, in the horizon of post-metaphysical ontology, language and communication are necessary conditions for the possibility of people's social and practical activity, including scientific (cognitive) activity. The language of science grows out of the natural usage of words. This means that the formation of scientific concepts, which begins within a certain interpretation of the world, never starts from scratch. The author concludes that, within the framework of postmetaphysical ontology, the transcendental dimension is reoriented. Language and culture turn out to be a transcendental condition for the possibility of obtaining universally valid knowledge. In communication itself, structures are found that generate the intersubjective significance of knowledge.

Download file
Counter downloads: 122

Keywords

foundations of knowledge, postmetaphysical ontology, transcendentalism, life world, communication

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Gaponov Alexander S.Tomsk Scientific Center, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State Universitygaponov@sibmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Ладов В.А. Идея ограничения теории типов в философии математики в контексте критики эпистемологического релятивизма // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 51. С. 43-52.
Ладов В.А. Критический анализ иерархического подхода Рассела-Тарского к решению проблемы парадоксов // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 44. С. 11-24.
Антух Г.Г. Очевидность, мышление, следование правилу // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 49. С. 5-16.
Рорти Р. Философия и зеркало природы / пер. с англ. В.В. Целищева. Новосибирск : Изд-во Новосиб. ун-та, 1997. 320 с.
Апель К.-О. Трансформация философии. М. : Логос, 2001. 344 с.
Кант И. Критика чистого разума / пер. с нем. Н. Лосского. Симферополь : Реноме, 2003. 464 с.
Habermas J. Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp, 1988. 86 S.
Борисов Е.В. Основные черты постметафизической онтологии. Томск : Изд-во Том. унта, 2009. 120 с.
Гуссерль Э. Кризис европейских наук и трансцендентальная феноменология / пер. с нем. Д.В. Скляднев. СПб. : Владимир Даль, 2004. 399 с.
Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время / пер. с нем. В.В. Бибихина. М. : Академический проект, 2013. 460 с.
Гадамер Г.-Г. Истина и метод: основы философской герменевтики : пер. с нем. / общ. ред. и вступ. ст. Б.Н. Бессонова. М. : Прогресс, 1988. 704 с.
Касавин И.Т. Критерии знания: собственно эпистемические или социальные? // Эпистемология: перспективы развития / отв. ред. В.А. Лекторский. М. : Канон+, 2012. С. 50-61
Гадамер Г.-Г. Актуальность прекрасного / пер. с нем. Ал.В. Михайлова. М. : Искусство, 1991. 367 с.
Фурс В.Н. Контуры современной критической теории. Минск : ЕГУ, 2002. 164 с.
 Conditions of Cognition in the Context of Postmetaphysical Ontology | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 57. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/57/1

Conditions of Cognition in the Context of Postmetaphysical Ontology | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 57. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/57/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 976