Selfward Speech Acts in the Context of Kant's Ethics and More | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 57. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/57/8

Selfward Speech Acts in the Context of Kant's Ethics and More

The author assumes that, alongside with a variety of speech acts that are addressed to the other, there are speech acts that are addressed to the speaker himself. These are selfward commands, promises, declaratives, and others. The aim of this article is to show that types of selfward speech acts can be distinguished between each other, and that these differences are fundamental within some areas of philosophical knowledge (ethics, for example). On the basis of Kant's goodwill ethical doctrine, the author shows that the distinction between selfward commissive/directive (roughly, selfward promise / command) and selfward declarative (roughly, selfward manifestation/proclamation) is fundamental. The major result is obtained due to the usage of formal philosophy of action tools, namely, a variation of the propositional dynamic logic. Using these tools, the author manages to demonstrate that free will defines itself with respect to the law of moral action as a deliberative agent (which reflects in formalism with the help of dstit-operator), while the act of free will of defining itself to a certain action is not deliberative (which reflects in formalism with the help of cstit-operator). The analysis of the way these two corresponding formulas show themselves on frames reveals the fundamental distinction between free will modes of action. Selfward declarative is the form of a universal code that is used by free will to make it respect the law of moral action. Selfward commissive/directive is the form of private practical principles (maxims), a form of making free will perform a certain act.

Download file
Counter downloads: 55

Keywords

selfward speech acts, obligations, ethics, logic of action

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Karpov Gleb V.Saint Petersburg State Universityglebsight@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Austin J. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford : Clarendon, 1962. 168 p.
Searle J. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts // Language. Mind and Knowledge / ed. K. Gunderson. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 1975. P. 344-369.
Geurts B. Making Sense of Self Talk // Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2018. Vol. 9, № 2. P. 271-285.
Searle J., Vanderveken D. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Кант И. Трактаты и письма. М. : Наука, 1980. 709 с.
Vanderveken D. Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, 1991. Vol. 1: Principles of Language Use. 256 р.
Vanderveken D. Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, 1991. Vol. 2: Formal Semantics of Success and Satisfaction. 193 р.
Benthem J. van, Pacuit E. Connecting Logics of Choice and Change // Nuel Belnap on Indeterminism and Free Action / ed. by T. Muller. Springer, 2014. P. 291-314.
Horty J., Belnap N. The Deliberative Stit: a Study of Action. Omission. Ability, and Obligation // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1995. Vol. 24, № 6. P. 583-644.
Horty J.F. Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2001. 192 р.
Kooi B., Tamminga A. Moral Conflicts Between Groups Of Agents // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2008. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 1-21.
Belnap N., Perloff M. In the realm of agents // Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 1993. № 9. Р. 25-48.
Chellas Brian F. Time and Modality in the Logic of Agency // Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic. 1992. Vol. 51, № 3/4: Logic of Action. P. 485-517.
Broersen J. Making a Start with the stit Logic Analysis of Intentional Action // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2011. Vol. 40, № 4. Р. 499-530.
Остин Дж. Три способа пролить чернила. СПб. : Алетейя : Из-во СПб. ун-та, 2006. 334 с.
Belnap N. Before Refraining: Concepts for Agency // Erkenntnis. 1991. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 137-169.
Xu M. Group Strategies and Independence // Nuel Belnap on Indeterminism and Free Action. Springer, 2014. P. 343-376.
Belnap N. Backwards and Forwards in the Modal Logic of Agency // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1991. Vol. 51, № 4. P. 777-807.
 Selfward Speech Acts in the Context of Kant's Ethics and More | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 57. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/57/8

Selfward Speech Acts in the Context of Kant's Ethics and More | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2020. № 57. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/57/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 975