The Theory of Truth in Friedrich Nietzsche's Philosophy
The article considers the theory of truth in the concept of philosophy of language proposed by Friedrich Nietzsche. A large number of researchers significant for the analytic tradition (Arthur Danto, Richard Rorty, etc.) draw a parallel between Nietzsche's philosophy and the positions of American pragmatists (especially William James and John Dewey). Pragmatism does not consider truth in a correspondent sense, but as a set of definitions that can be considered useful for everyday life. Such a connection between truth and utility can indeed be found in Nietzsche's works, but the concept of truth is embedded in the language theory he develops. From Nietzsche's point of view, it is not individual statements that are useful, but the language itself as it forms the external and internal reality of the individual. Such an interpretation of language allows looking differently at the problems of realism and anti-realism related to the names of Hilary Putnam and Richard Rorty, and, although Rorty tries to point to his connection with Nietzsche's ideas, there are a number of fundamental differences between their positions. One such difference is the interpretation of metaphors (Donald Davidson); although there are certain similarities between Nietzsche's and Davidson's views, this understanding of language does not allow considering these theories relevant to each other. If in Davidson's analysis metaphors do not express anything new about facts/objects, in Nietzsche's philosophy objects themselves (as well as subjects opposed to them) are considered as metaphors, i.e. linguistically loaded constructs. Therefore, metaphors should be considered as a way of changing our language games. Since this will directly disrupt an individual's communication with society, such a process cannot be considered as pragmatically oriented. This leads to a key difference between Nietzschean and pragmatic positions: the usefulness of our false conceptions allows us to call them truths, but Nietzsche denies that such "truths" have a certain metaphysical basis. Truth should be regarded exclusively as a "metaphor" that allows other metaphors of our reality (subject, object, cognition, etc.) to work. The supporters of the deflationary theory of truth interpret the concept of truth in a similar way.
Keywords
Nietzsche,
theory of truth,
pragmatism,
metaphors,
anti-realismAuthors
Kochnev Roman L. | Omsk State Technical University | r-kochnev@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Ницше Ф. Человеческое, слишком человеческое // Сочинения : в 2 т. М. : Мысль, 1996. Т. 1. С. 232-491.
Фуко М. Лекции о Воле к знанию с приложением «Знание Эдипа» : курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1970-1971 учебном году. СПб. : Наука, 2016. 350 с.
Данто А. Ницше как философ. М. : Идея-Пресс : Дом интеллектуальной книги, 2001. 280 с.
Ницше Ф. Стихотворения. Философская проза. СПб. : Худ. лит., СПб. отд-ние, 1993. 628 с.
Ладов В.А. Формальный реализм. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2011. 132 с.
James W. Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking. New York : Longmans, Green and Co, 1922. 309 p.
Ницше Ф. Воля к власти. Опыт переоценки всех ценностей. М. : Культурная революция, 2005. 880 с.
Нехаев А.В. «Анти-Рорти»: дискурсивный сюрреализм и понятие факта // Омский научный вестник. Сер. Общество. История. Современность. 2017. № 2. С. 49-56.
Rorty R. Pragmatism, Relativism, and Irrationalism // Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 1994. 237 p.
Rorty R. Introduction: Antirepresentationalism, Ethnocentrism, and Liberalism // Rorty R. Philosophical Papers. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1991. Vol. 1. P. 1-11. II. PutnamH. Words and Life. Harvard : Harvard University Press, 1995. 608 p.
Putnam H. Words and Life. Harvard : Harvard University Press, 1995. 608 p.
Putnam H. Renewing Philosophy. Harvard : Harvard University Press, 1992. 248 p.
Рорти P. Философия и зеркало природы. Новосибирск : Изд-во Новосиб. ун-та, 1997. 320 c.
Ницше Ф. По ту сторону добра и зла // Сочинения : в 2 т. М. : Мысль, 1996. Т. 2. С. 239-406.
Свасьян К.А. Фридрих Ницше: мученик познания [вступ. ст.] // Ницше Ф. Сочинения : в 2 т. М. : Мысль, 1996. Т. 1. C. 5-46.
Рорти Р. Случайность, ирония, солидарность. М. : Рус. феноменологическое о-во, 1996. 282 с.
Davidson D. What metaphors mean? // Critical Inquiry. 1978. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 31-47.
Nehamas А. Nlietzsche: Life as Literature. Harvard University Press, 1987. 288 p.
Борисов Е.В., Ладов В.А., Суровцев В.А. Язык, сознание, мир : очерки компаративного анализа феноменологии и аналитической философии. Вильнюс : ЕГУ, 2010. 156 c.
Суровцев В.А., Сыров В.Н. Языковая игра и роль метафоры в научном познании // Философия науки. 1999. № 1. С. 20-30.
Ницше Ф. Веселая наука // Сочинения : в 2 т. М. : Мысль, 1996. Т. 1. C. 492-719.
Putnam H. The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body and World. New York : Columbia University Press, 2001. 234 p.
Rorty R. Putnam and the Relativist Menace // Journal of Philosophy. 1993. Vol. 90, № 9. P. 443-481.
Gori P. Nietzsche on Truth: a Pragmatic View? // Nietzscheforschung. Wirklich. Wirklichkeit. Wirklichkeiten Nietzsche uber.,wahre" und.,scheinbare" Welten, 2013. Bd. 20. S. 71-90.
Ламберов Б.Д. Дефляционные теории истины: проблема общего определения // Онтология, гносеология, логика. 2011. Т. 9, № 3. С. 13-19.
Хакинг Я. Почему язык имеет значение для философии? // Аналитическая философия: становление и развитие (антология). М. : Дом интеллектуальный книги : Прогресс-Традиция, 1998. 528 с.
Юм Д. Сочинения : в 2 т. М. : Мысль, 1996. Т. 1. 734 с.