Image Strategy in the Semantic Space of Regional Policy
The article discusses the role of universities in the formation of the regional and city brand. The authors reveal a whole range of problems showing step by step that the traditional marketing approach to branding, transferred from the commodity sphere to the sociopolitical one, even when equipped with extensive marketing research and presentations, is doomed to failure. The reasons are as follows. Today, the modern economy is inscribed in the "knowledge" paradigm. As for universities and university cities, they are (or are to be) on the front line of the socioeconomic frontier. Since their inception, the few universities have been a distinctive feature that elevates the city above others, an important support for the urban economy, a special lifestyle; they took an active part in the formation of meaning. The university has since become an indicator of wisdom, enlightenment, and knowledge. In the era of the Third Industrial Revolution, Ford's approach to the sociopolitical sphere turned not only cities, but also universities into an appendage of the production site, and reduced knowledge to the applied one, inscribing its share in the cost of goods. The contemporary "knowledge society" and the global economy are built on the ruins of the previous era, and universities are becoming not only centers for the export of knowledge, but also arbiters in the development of a branding strategy for "unpromising" regions (Italy), the core of the "living cities" of the devastated industrial belt (USA); they seek recognition and set networks within EU projects (Hungary). At the same time, there remains a contradiction that raises the question of the timeliness of referring to the city as a "political idea" that would allow uniting the leading forces - science, government, citizens (civil society), and the media - in the development of the city branding strategy. Undoubtedly, the number of stakeholders is much larger, but it is these forces that are capable of giving meaning to empty slogans and unreadable images - far from both the brand identity and the necessary residents' loyalty to it - that are so often found in the practice of regional strategies.
Keywords
meaning,
regional image strategy,
university city,
brandingAuthors
Shcherbinin Alexey I. | Tomsk State University | shai52@mail.ru |
Sevostianov Alexey V. | Tomsk State University | 9410@mail.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Stehr N. The Fragility of Modern Societies: Knowledge and Risk in the Information Age. 1 ed. London : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2001. 240 p.
Найман Е.А. Становление концепции «обучающегося региона» в западной науке // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение. 2013. № 1 (9). С. 81-91.
Hemsley-Brown J.V., OplatkaI. Universities in a competitive global marketplace: a systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2006. Vol. 19, № 4. P. 316-338.
Hornidge A.-K. Knowledge Society. Vision & Social Construction of Reality in Germany & Singapore. Munster : LIT Verlag, 2007. 386 p.
Щербинин А.И. От «живых лабораторий» к «живому городу»: пространство и миссия университетов в эпоху умных городов // Праксема. Проблемы визуальной семиотики. 2020. Вып. 1 (23). С. 208-220.
Cavicchi A., Rinaldi Ch., Corsi M. Higher Education Institutions as Managers of Wicked Problems: Place Branding and Rural Development in Marche Region, Italy // International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 2013. Vol. 16, special is. A. P. 51-68.
Rekettye G., Pozsgai G. University and place branding: the case of universities located in ECC (European Capital of Culture) cities // Ekonomski viesnik - Ekonews. 2015. God. XXVIII, posebno izd. S. 13-24.
Кочева Е.Э., Кочев И.А. Обсуждение международного научно-практического проекта «Имидж университетского города» // Имидж университетского города: российско-германские исследования / под ред. К. Шуберта, А.И. Щербинина. Томск : Курсив, 2012. Т. 1. С. 8-48.
Щербинин А.И. Россия в условиях поворота к сетевому обществу: новый глобальный вызов за пределами современности // Русин. 2019. Т. 58. С. 255-265.
Braun E., Kavaratzis M., Zenker S. My City - My Brand: the Different Roles of Residents in Place Branding // Journal of Place Management and Development. 2013. № 6 (1). P. 18-28. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331311306087 (access date: 02.09.2020).
Peighambari K., Sattari S., Foster T., Wallstrom A. Two tales of one city: Image versus identity // Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 2016. Vol. 12. P. 314-328.
McAlexander J.A., Keonig H.F., Schouten J. W. Building relationship of brand community in higher education: A strategic framework for university advancement // International Journal of Education Advancement. 2006. Vol. 6 (2). Р. 107-118.
McAlexander J.A., Keonig H.F., Schouten J. W. Building a university brand community: The long-term impact of shared experiences // Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2005. Vol. 14 (2). Р. 61-79.
Perlmutter D.D. Branding Higher Education Bibliography. URL: https://www.davidperlmutter-research.com/branding-higher-education-bibliography/
Shapleo C., Carrillo-Duran M.V., Diaz A.K. Do UK universities communicate their brands effectively through their websites? // Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2011. June. P. 25-46.