Revising Karl Marx’s Concept of Alienation Through the Agile Approach
The twentieth century demonstrated the undoubted correctness of Marx’s theory of alienation. Many of the problems he pointed out reached their climax at the end of the twentieth century and became the focus of attention when management realized them as an obstacle to development in the most innovative sectors of the economy. On the other hand, non-capitalist production showed similar dysfunctions associated with alienation. All this shows that alienation, which Marx considered a product of capitalism, is, on the whole, a property of the industrial system and the requirements that it makes to organizing labor, to the place and role of the actor in the production system. Post-industrial society is freed from alienation in labor due to new approaches to management and work motivation, agile transformations in particular. The article presents the results of a theoretical review of Marx’s theory of alienation. The author analyzed the methods of overcoming alienation used in agile companies. The results of expert interviews are presented in the article. The informants were 11 experts in the field of agile transformations: heads of companies that have implemented agile transformations of large oil and gas enterprises, banks and a number of other large corporations; external consultants on setting up agile business processes in startups; agile coaches of IT companies working in-house. Based on the conducted expert interviews, the author demonstrates the ways a modern company, in the postindustrial era, changes its approach to management, overcoming the aspects of alienation Marx wrote about, but at the same time remains within the framework of the capitalist system and private ownership on the production means. Based on the results of the analysis of the interviews, the following methods of overcoming alienation modern companies use are distinguished: 1. Increasing teams’ autonomy: instead of external control over the work process, agile companies practice setting high-level tasks for teams. Such practices collectively are a way to overcome alienation from the work process. 2. Teamwork on the project. In an agile company, the work unit is not an individual, but a team. The management model, built on the principle of teams’ self-organization, implies constant communication, and team responsibility contributes to the development of mutual assistance and support. Thus, the alienation of people from each other in the production process is overcome. 3. Having a clear and shared work purpose. 4. Authorization of the result: it ceases to be anonymous due to the fact that instead of a structure with a team of functional departments, employees work in small groups on an autonomous product.
Keywords
work motivation,
alienation,
agile,
autonomy,
MarxAuthors
Orlova Nadezhda A. | Higher School of Economics | naorlova@hse.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Шевчук А. От фабрики к платформе: автономия и контроль в цифровой экономике // Социология власти. 2020. Т. 32, № 1. С. 30-54. DOI: 10.22394/2074-0492-2020-1-30-54
Mann S., Besser T. Diversification and Work Satisfaction: Testing a Claim by Marx and Engels for Farmers // Rural Sociol. 2017. № 82. С. 349-362.
Pink D.H. Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. // Riverhead Books. 2011. P. 1-272.
Sprenger R.K. Mythos Motivation // Wege aus einer Sackgasse, Campus Verlag. 2002. P. 1295.
Sutherland J. Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time, Crown Publishing Group. 2014. P. 1-256.
Drucker P. Managing in the Next Society. Griffin; Reprint edition. 2002. P. 1-321.
Porter T., Gerhardt M., Fields D., Bugenhagen M. An exploratory study of gender and motivation to lead in millennials // The Journal of Social Psychology. 2019. 03.04. P. 138-152.
Немировская А.В., Соболева Н.Э. Трудовые аттитюды и самооценка трудового положения молодежи и взрослого населения Ленинград. обл. и г. Санкт-Петербург // Условия и способы повышения активности молодежи как субъекта инноваций и устойчивого развития регионов : сб. докл. ст. участников XV Всерос. науч.-практ. конф. в рамках инициативной программы «Проблемы социокультурной эволюции России и ее регионов». Санкт-Петербург, 9-11 октября 2019 г. СПб. : Реноме, 2019. С. 44-59.
Маркс К. Критика политической экономии. Черновой набросок 1857-1858 годов // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения: 2-е изд. 1955.
Чепуренко А.Ю. Маркс в университете 3.0? // Социологические исследования. 2018. № 5. С. 26-34.
Удальцова М.В., Абрамова Е.А. Социальные взаимодействия как механизм формирования социальности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 48. C. 126-134. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnye-vzaimodeystviya-kak-mehanizm-formirovaniya-sotsialnosti (дата обращения: 03.05.2020).
Красильщиков В.А. Карл Маркс: двести лет молодости? // Социологические исследования. 2018. № 5. С. 3-14. DOI: 10.7868/S013216251805001
Черныш М.Ф. Современный марксизм в мировом и российском контекстах // Социологические исследования. 2018. № 5. С. 15-25. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518050021
Славин Б.Ф. О социальном идеале Маркса и исторических пределах развития капитализма // Социологические исследования. 2018. № 5. С. 35-44. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518050045
Красин Ю. А. Марксизм: взгляд из XXI века // Социологические исследования. 2018. № 5. С. 45-55. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518050057
Worrell M.P., Krier D. Atopia Awaits! A Critical Sociological Analysis of Marx’s Political Imaginary // Critical Sociology. 2018. № 44(2). P. 213-239. DOI: 10.1177/0896920515620476
Salerno R. A. Imagining Lacan Imagining Marx // Critical Sociology. 2018. № 44(2). Р. 259266. DOI: 10.1177/0896920516658942
Jourshari A., Haghighat S. An assessment of the concept of alienation in marxist theories // Amazonia Investiga. 2019. № 8(18). P. 471-482. URL: https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/360
Lotz C. Alienation, Private Property, and Democracy // Critical Sociology. 2018. № 44(2). P. 267-274. DOI: 10.1177/0896920516664963
TenHouten W. Alienation, from Hegel and Feuerbach to Marx and Engels // Routledge Advances in Sociology. 2017. P. 30-44.
Byron С. Essence and Alienation: Marx's Theory of Human Nature // Science & Society. 2016. Vol. 80, № 3. P. 375-394. DOI: 10.1521/siso.2016.80.3.375
Miguelez B. La Production Socio Institucional de Sufrimiento Social // International and Multidisciplinary Journalof Social Sciences. 2016. № 5(1). Р. 1-25. DOI: 10.17583/rimcis.2016.1802
Sevignani S. Privacy and Capitalism in the Age of Social Media Preface // Routledge Research in Information Technology and Society. 2016. Book 18. Р. 1-254.
Krahn H.J., Lowe G.S. Work, Industry, and Canadian Society: second edition. Scarborough, Nelson Canada, 1993.
Amabile T.M., Goldfarb P., Brackfield S.C. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance // Creativity Research Journal. 1990. № 3(1). P. 6-21. DOI: 10.1080/ 10400419009534330
McGraw K.O. The Detrimental Effects of Reward on Performance: A Literature Review and a Prediction Model // The Hidden Costs of Reward: New Perspectives on the Psychology of Human Motivation / eds. M. Lepper, D. Greene. London : Psychology Press, 1978. P. 33-60.
Maximini D. The Scrum Culture: Introducing Agile Methods in Organizations. Springer International Publishing, 2018.
Baard P.P., Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2004. № 34 (10). P. 2045-2068.