Smart Technologies as a Concept and Phenomenon: On Criteria | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021. № 60. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/60/4

Smart Technologies as a Concept and Phenomenon: On Criteria

Smart technologies are explored as a phenomenon and concept. The focus on the subject is due to the wide spread of smart technologies, their ubiquitous use in everyday life, and the insufficient level of their reflection both as a phenomenon and as a concept. This contradiction does not always contribute to the efficient use of smart technologies. Smart technologies as a concept are largely determined by the specifics of their phenomenal functioning, which complicates the possibility of its clear definition. Therefore, in foreign and domestic studies, it is impossible to find a universal way of determining smart technologies due to the contextual factors in the form of social, cultural, value differences between different societies and countries. On the example of comparing connotations of the concept “smart technology” in English- and Russian-language studies, the differences in semantic nuances is demonstrated. The inaccuracy of translating “smart technologies” as “umnye tekhnologii” (“umnye” is a derivative of “um” [mind]) is justified, since this connotation is not unambiguously recognized either by foreign or domestic authors. More precisely, the concept “um” is not of the utmost importance in the concept under consideration in foreign literature. The Russian-speaking tradition of understanding the word “um” (“umnye”) also has certain specifics. In the domestic tradition, an understanding of “um/mind” as a “staircase wit” has developed, which significantly prevents the formation of value-based, cultural and social ontological foundations for the creation and effective use of smart technologies. This dependence of the definition of smart technologies on the practice of applying this phenomenon is also evident in other societies and countries. Criteria for distinguishing smart technologies from technologies of a traditional type are revealed: technological and generational. The characteristics associated with technological criteria are universal in nature, but their values are nevertheless determined by the values and cultural features of countries where smart technologies are exploited. The same applies to the generational foundation, which manifests itself all over the world regardless of culture and country and is due to the birth of generation Z. At the same time, the universalism of the generational plan does not negate the cultural values of this or that society, under the influence of which this factor is further leveled.

Download file
Counter downloads: 49

Keywords

smart, smart technology, criteria, concept, phenomenon

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Ardashkin Igor B.Tomsk Polytechnic Universityibardashkin@tpu.ru
Surovtsev Valery A.Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State Universitysurovtsev1964@mail.ru
Всего: 2

References

Ардашкин И.Б. Смарт-технологии как феномен: концептуализация подходов и философский анализ. Являются ли смарт-технологии действительно умными? // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 43. С. 55-68.
Гончаренко М.В., Гончаренко В.Н. Трансформация дискурса как следствие формирования новых эпистемологических полей // Вестник Томского государственного университета Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 47. С. 103-110.
Ардашкин И.Б. Смарт-общество как этап развития новых технологий для общества или как новый этап социального развития (прогресса): к постановке проблемы // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2017. № 38. С. 32-45.
Гончаренко М.В., Гончаренко В.Н. Эпистемологические поля и новые смыслы // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2019. № 439. С. 85-94.
Bibri S.E. Shaping of Ambient Intelligence and the Internet of Things: Historico-Epistemic, Socio-Cultural, Politico-Institutional and Eco-Environmental Dimensions. Part of the Atlantis Ambient and Pervasive Intelligence book series. Paris : Atlantis Press, 2015. Vol. 10. 301 p.
Chabot M., Delaware L., McCarley S., Little C., Nye A., Anderson E. Living in Place: The Impact of Smart Technology // Current Geriatrics Reports. 2019. № 8. Р. 232-238.
The Oxford English Dictionary, 2019. URL: https://www.lexico.com/en (accessed: 03.12.2019).
Днепровская Н.В., Янковская Е.А., Шевцова И.В. Понятийные основы концепции смарт-образования // Открытое образование. 2015. № 6. С. 43-51.
Загребин М.В. Предрассудок как вид ума // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки. 2016. № 1. С. 24-32.
Колесов В.В. Концепты Рассудок, Разум, Ум и Мудрость в поле русского сознания // Гуманитарный вектор. 2016. Т. 11, № 3. С. 75-86.
Makienko Marina A., Kurkan Natalia V., Emelyanenko Ekaterina E. Etnical Implications to the Assessment of the Smart grid Technology in Russia // MATEC Web of Conferences. 2017. Vol. 91. Р. 01020.
Королева Л.Г., Сухоруких А.В. «Цифровизация» или гуманизация образования: актуальность асиологической альтернативы // Научные ведомости. Серия: Философия. Социология. Право. 2019. Т. 44, № 3. С. 375-385.
Мелик-Гайказян И.В., Мелик-Гайказян М.В., Тарасенко В.Ф. Методология моделирования нелинейной динамики сложных систем. М. : Физико-математическая литература, 2001. 272 с.
Roblek V., Meško M., Dimovski V., Peterlin J. Smart technologies as social innovation and complex social issues of the Z generation // Kybernetes. 2019. № 48 (1). P. 91-107.
Nakashima H., Aghajan H., Augusto J.C. Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments: A State of the Art // Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. New York : Springer, 2010. Р. 3-34.
Jacobson I. What they don't teach you about software at school: Be smart! Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2009. Vol. 31. P. 1-4.
Jucevičius R., Jucevičienė P. Sumaniosios socialinės sistemos koncepcijа // Sumanioji social-linė Sistema. Kaunas : Technologija, 2017. P. 12-34.
Jucevicius G., Juceviciene R. Smart Development of Organizational Trust: Dilemmas and Paradoxes // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. № 213. P. 860-866.
Pauliukevičiūtė A., Jucevičius R. Six Smartness Dimensions in Cultural Management: Social / Cultural Environment Perspective // Business, Management and Education. 2018. № 16(1). P. 108-120.
Ardashkin I.B., Chmykhalo A.Y., Makienko M.A., Khaldeeva M.A. Smart-Technologies In Higher Engineering Education: Modern Application Trends // The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2018. Vol. L. P. 57-64.
Рыгина М.Е., Чмыхало А.Ю. Перспективы и проблемы использования смарт-технологий в образовательном процессе // Непрерывное благополучие в мире : сб. науч. тр. III Междунар. науч. симп. / под ред. Г.А. Барышевой, Л.М. Борисовой ; Том. политехн. ун-т. Томск : Изд-во ТПУ, 2016. С. 67-72.
 Smart Technologies as a Concept and Phenomenon: On Criteria | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021. № 60. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/60/4

Smart Technologies as a Concept and Phenomenon: On Criteria | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021. № 60. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/60/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 983