“The fathers were the ones who ate the sour grapes...”: Anthropological implications from the modern epigenetics | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2022. № 67. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/67/5

“The fathers were the ones who ate the sour grapes...”: Anthropological implications from the modern epigenetics

In this paper I examine the research program of epigenetics, which corresponds to the entry into the post-genomic era and represents a link between the social sciences and the life sciences. I show that epigenetics presupposes a reconsideration of the rigid version of genetic determinism and demonstrates the importance of the impact of the environment on the state and evolution of the genome, which should be regarded as an epigenome. I draw attention to the phenomenon of transgenerational inheritance, which suggests a notable correlation of states of stress and physical deprivation of individuals, with the state of mind and health of their descendants, and leads to the idea that social dynamics should be considered in terms of evolution of a holistic system over time. It makes one ponder over the fate of people and their descendants, depending on circumstances determined by the metamorphosis occurring in society over rather long segments of time. I argue that such consideration can be carried out in the context of the methodology of biocultural coconstructivism, which allows presenting this evolution as a process of mutual determination of all components of this system, in particular, having in mind gene-cultural interactions. The author declares no conflicts of interests.

Download file
Counter downloads: 25

Keywords

post-genomic era, epigenetics, epigenome, genotype, phenotype, biocultural co-constructivism methodology, transgenerational inheritance

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Bazhanov Valentin A.Russian Society for History and Philosophy of Sciencevbazhanov@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Dubois M., Guaspare C., Louvel S. From Genetics and Epigenetics: A “Postgenomic” Revolution for the Social Scientists”// Revue francaise de sociologie. 2018. Vol. 59. P. 1-24.
Rabin J.S. Behavioral Epigenetics: The Underpinnings of Political Psychology // The Psychology of Political Behavior in a Time of Change / Eds. Jan D. Sinnott, Joan S. Rabin. Springer, 2021. P. 55-98.
Jablonka E. The evolutionary implications of epigenetics inheritance // Interface Focus. 2017. Vol. 7. Article 20160135. doi: 10.1098/rsfs. 2016.0135
Chiapperino L. Epigenetics: Ethics, Politics, Biosociality // British Medical Bulletin. 2018. Vol. 128. P. 49 0 60. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy033
Bohm D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York ; London : Routledge, 1980. XIX. 284 p.
Bellazi F. The emergence of postgenomic gene // European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2022. Vol. 12. P. 17-38. doi: 10.1007/s13194-022-00446-0
Garrett-Bakelman F.E., Darshi M. et al, The NASA Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight // Science. 2019. Vol. 364, is. 436. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8650
Zimmer C. “Scott Kelly Spent A Year In Orbit. His Body Is Not Quite The Same” // The New York Times. 2019. April 12. (https://carlzimmer.com/scott-kelly-spent-a-year-in-orbit-his-body-is-not-quite-the-same accessed on May 2, 2022).
Pembrey M.E., Bygren L.O. et al., Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans // European Journal of Human Genetics. 2006. Vol. 14. P. 159-166.
Soubrey A. Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: A paternal perspective on dietary influence // Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2015. Vol. 118. P. 79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.02.008
Ashe A., Colot V., Oldroyd B.P. How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution? // Philosophical Transactions. B. 2021. Vol. 376. Article 20200111. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0111
Loison L. Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: a historian’s perspective // Philosophical Transactions. B. 2021. Vol. 376. Article 20200120. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0120
Santos M., Szathmary E., Fontanari J.F. Phenotypic plasticity, the Baldwin effect, and the speeding up of evolution: The computational roots of an illusion// Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2015. Vol. 371. P. 127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.02.012
Rothstein M.A., Harrell H.L., Marchant G.E. Transgenerational epigenetics and environmental justice // Environmental Epigenetics. 2017. Vol. 3 (3). P. 1-12. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvx011
Muller R., Hanson C. et al., The biosocial genome? Interdisciplinary perspectives on environmental epigenetics, health and society // EMBO reports. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 1677-1682. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744953
Pentecost M., Meloni M. “It’s never too early”: Preconception care and postgenomic models of life // Frontiers in Sociology. 2020. Vol. 5. Article 21. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00021 54 Социальная философия и философская антропология / Social philosophy and philosophy of humanity
Breton C. V., Landon R., Kahn L.G. et al. Exploring the evidence for epigenetic regulation of environmental influences on child health across generations // Communications Biology. 2021. Vol. 4. Article 769. doi: 10.1038/s420003-021-02316-6
Ахутина Т.В., Меликян З.А. Бедность и развитие мозга // Бедность и развитие ребенка / Под ред. Д.А. Александрова, В.А. Иванюшиной, К.А. Маслинского. М. : Рукописные памятники древней Руси, 2015. С. 115-176.
Skyberg A.M., Beller-Duden S. et al. Neuroepigenetic Impact on Mentalizing in Childhood // Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2022. Vol. 54. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101080
Tooley U.A., Bassett D.S., Mackey A.P. Environmental Influences on the pace of Brain Development // Nature Review Neuroscience. 2021. Vol. 22 (6). P. 372-384. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00457-5
Wexler B.E. Brain and Culture. Neurobiology, Ideology, and Social Change. Cambridge MA., L., The Bradford Books. The MIT Press, 2006. IX,' 307 p.
Lv J., Xin Y., Zhou W., Qiu Z. The epigenetic switches for neural development and psychiatric disorders // Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2013. Vol. 40. P. 339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.04.007
Rasmussen P.D., Storebo O.J. Attachment and epigenetics: A scoping review of recent research and current knowledge // Psychological reports. 2021. Vol. 124 (2). P. 479-501. doi: 10.1177/0033294120901846
Troller-Renfree S.V., Constanzo M.A., Duncan G.J. et al. The impact of a poverty reduction intervention on infant brain activity // PNAS. 2022. Vol. 119, No. 5. Article 21156489119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115649119
Сапольски Р. Кто мы такие? Гены, наше тело, общество. М. : Альпина-фикшн, 2018. 290 с.
Wikenius E. Can Early Life Stress Engender Biological Resilience? // Journal of Child and Adolescence Trauma. 2020. Vol. 14 (1). P. 161-163. doi: 10.1007/s40653-020-00303-3
Jasienska G. The fragile wisdom: An evolutionary view on women’s biology and health. Cambridge (MA) : Harvard University Press, 2013. 336 p.
Jasienska G. Public health needs evolutionary thinking // PNAS. 2021. Vol. 118, No. 31. Article e2110985118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110985118
Pembrey M.E., Saffery R. et al. Human transgenerational responses to early-life experience: potential impact on development, health and biomedical research // Journal of Medical Genetics. 2014. Vol. 51. P. 563-572.
Bowers M.E., Yehuda R.Intergenerational Transmission of Stress in Humans // Neuropharmacology Reviews. 2016. Vol. 41. P. 232-244.
Jasienska G. Low birth weight of contemporary African Americans: An intergenerational effect of Slavery? // American journal of Human Biology. 2009. Vol. 21. P. 16-24. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20824
Micheletti S.J., Bryc K., Esselmann S.G. Genetic consequences of the transatlantic Slave trade in the Americas // The Journal of Human Genetics. 2020. Vol. 107. P. 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.06.012
Mazumder B., Almond D., Park K. et al. Lingering prenatal effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic on cardiovascular disease // The Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. 2010. Vol. 1 (1). P. 26-34. doi: 10.1017/S2040174409990031
Yehuda R., Daskalakis N.P., Bierer L.M. et al. Holocaust Exposure Induced Intergenerational Effects on FKBP5 Methylation // Biological Psychiatry. 2016. Vol. 80. P. 372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005
Taki F., De-Melo-Martin I. Conducting epigenetic research with refugees and asylum seekers: attending to the ethical challenges // Clinical Epigenetics. 2021. Vol. 13. Article 105. doi: 10.1186/s13148-021-01092-8
Lehrner A., Yehuda R. Cultural trauma and epigenetic inheritance // Development and Psychopathology. 2018. Vol. 30. P. 1763-1777. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418001153
Бажанов В.А. Феномен воспроизводимости в фокусе эпистемологии и философии науки // Вопросы философии. 2022. № 5. С. 25-35. doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2022-5-25-35
Dubois M., Louvel S. Rial-Sebbag E. Epigenetics and an interdiscipline? Promises and fallacies of a biosocial research agenda.Introduction to a special issue // Social Science Information. 2020. Vol. 59. P. 3-11. doi: 10.1177/0539018420908233
Preckel K., Trautmann S., Kanske P. Medication-enhanced psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: recent findings on Oxytocin’s involvement in the neurobiology and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder // Clinical Psychology in Europe. 2021. Vol. 3 (4). Article e3645. doi: 10.3272/cpe.3645
Robison S.K. The Political Implications of Epigenetics // Politics and Life Sciences. 2016. Vol. 35, No. 2. P. 30-49. doi: 10.1017/pls.2016.14
Бажанов В.А. Социум и мозг: биокультурный со-конструктивизм // Вопросы философии. 2018. № 2. С. 78-88.
 “The fathers were the ones who ate the sour grapes...”: Anthropological implications from the modern epigenetics | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2022. № 67. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/67/5

“The fathers were the ones who ate the sour grapes...”: Anthropological implications from the modern epigenetics | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2022. № 67. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/67/5

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 267