Corruption risks and business’s emancipation from corruption

The article deals with the analysis of the political-economical origin of corruption, corruption risks and the role of the state in emancipation of business from corruption. The reasons defining the objective nature of corruption and corruption risks are given on the basis of competition marking business by the extent of the recourse to administrative factors as well as by the part of the state in countering corruption risks and corruptive emancipation of business. Like the defense mechanism for business the state in the face of competition doesn’t cope with the shielding any business caught in a difficult economic situation without standing the competition. Specifically the state triggers off higher competition because of the negligence to interests of any certain business or entire industries. If the necessity in corruption is predetermined by business also the suggestions from business are predetermined by civil servants who are ready to support this necessity notably to their greatest advantage. The concept of corruption is defined as objective peculiarity of the modern society, as the result of competition specifying by commodity and money relations. Corruption itself sets the direction of corruption risks identification. Arising from competition, corruption risks constitute a prospective of entering of political-economic agents into a form of commodity and money relations resulting in purchase-sale of goods ineligible to be privatized on political, moral and traditional grounds. The necessity of reexamination of laws in the part of their influence business needs to ignore the law is given in the findings. The state should be greatly approved in its striving to facilitate relations with business, to remove barriers in formation and to support favorable reproduction. All this leads to emancipation of business which in turn provides more acceptable climate for reproduction and hence reduces the demand for private services of civil servants. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Keywords

Authors

References