ABOUT NATURE OF SOCIAL REALITY AND EPISTEMOLOGICALSTATUS OF HISTORICAL NARRATIVES | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2009. № 3 (7).

ABOUT NATURE OF SOCIAL REALITY AND EPISTEMOLOGICALSTATUS OF HISTORICAL NARRATIVES

This article is intended as a contribution to discussionof problem of place and functions of narratives. It discuss of idea of phenomenologist David Carrabout continuity between narrative and «real world». The key view of this author is that the historicalnarratives will reveal themselves to be not distortions of, denials of, or escapes from reality, but extensionsand configurations of its primary features. It means that the historians' thematization existsbecause historians live in a milieu in which a very general story already exists as a pre-thematic narrativecontext. William Dray, one of the critics of this view, says that this position is not good paradigmfor explanation of nature of historicity of human being and conditions of birth of historiography. Ithink that it necessary to subscribe to opinion of Carr about continuity between narrative and «realworld». But it is not a reason to suppose that the historical narratives are mirror of «real world». Ourthesis is that historical narratives will reveal themselves to be not reconstructions or configurations ofpast, but reconfigurations of narratives of social reality or primary narratives that constitute the «realworld».

Download file
Counter downloads: 206

Keywords

философия истории, историческое познание, нарратив, исторический нарратив, темпоральность, Philosophy of history, historical studies, narrative, historical narrative, temporality

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Syrov V.N.
Всего: 1

References

Carr D. Time, Narrative, and History. Indiana Univ. Press, 1991.
Mink L. O. Historical Understanding. Cornell Univ. Press, 1987.
Kreiswirth M. Tell Me a Story: The Narrativist Turn in the Human Sciences // Constructive criticism. The Human Sciences in a Age of Theory / Ed. by M. Kreiswirth and T. Carmichael. Univ. of Toronto Press, 1995. P. 61-87.
Гуссерль Э. Собрание сочинений. Т. 1: Феноменология внутреннего сознания времени. М., 1994.
Мерло-Понти М. Временность // Историко-философский ежегодник '90. М., 1991. С. 271-293.
Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время. М., 1997.
Norman A.P. Historical Narrative on Their Own Terms // History and Theory: Contemporary Reading / Ed. By B. Fay, Ph. Pomper and R.T. Vann. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1998. P. 153-171.
Drey W.H. Narrative and Historical realism // The History and Narrative Reader / Ed. by G. Roberts. Routledge, 2001. P. 157-180.
Фуко М. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук. СПб., 1994.
Rimmon-Kenan Sh. Narrative Fiction. Contemporary Poetics. 2nd Ed. Routledge, 2002.
Фуко М. Что такое автор? // Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности: Работы разных лет. М., 1994. С. 9-46.
Carr D. Getting the Story Straight // The History and Narrative Reader / Ed. by G. Roberts. Routledge, 2001. P. 197-207.
White H. Historical Text as Literary Artifact // The Writing of History. Literary Form and Historical Understanding / Ed. by R.H. Canary and H. Kozicki. The Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1978. P. 41-62.
 ABOUT NATURE OF SOCIAL REALITY AND EPISTEMOLOGICALSTATUS OF HISTORICAL NARRATIVES | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2009. № 3 (7).

ABOUT NATURE OF SOCIAL REALITY AND EPISTEMOLOGICALSTATUS OF HISTORICAL NARRATIVES | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2009. № 3 (7).

Download file