Academic Journals: Production of Local Reputations
The article examines the formation of academic reputation in Russian sociology (and ultimately thestate of the Russian sociology) through citation analysis of selected Russian sociological journals.Citation analysis focuses on two parameters: institutional affiliation of the authors and the citationpreferences of institutions. The results suggest that the field of sociological publication in Russia (reflectingand reproducing the field of Russian sociology) is divided in isolated segments with fewcitations between different segments. These segments are built - rather than on theoretical disagreements- both on the administrative principles (academic institutions behind the journals) as well as ongeographical factors (mainly Moscow vs. St Petersburg). Ultimately this creates a state of affairswhere researchers reputation is formed within each sociological segment allowing its members toignore not only the remaining sociological journals, but also other segments.
Keywords
российская социология,
социология науки,
наукометрияAuthors
| Guba Katerina S. | European University at St. Petersburg | kguba@eu.spb.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Henkens K., van Dalen H. 2004. Signals in Science - On the Importance of Signaling in Gaining Attention in Science, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-113/1, Tinbergen Institute. Доступно: http://ideas.repec.org/e/pva110.html
Jacobs J. 2010. Journal Rankings in Sociology: Using the H Index with Google Scholar. Available: https://sociology.sas.upenn.edu/sites/ sociology.sas.upenn.edu/files/Journal% 20Rankings% 20in%20Sociology%20jacobs%20june%202010.doc
Соколов М. 2009. Проблема консолидации академического авторитета в постсоветской науке: случай социологии. Антропологический форум 9: 8-32.
Gross А. 2000. The Science Wars and the Ethics of Book Reviewing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30.
Collins R. 1994. Why the Social Sciences Won't Become High-Consensus, Rapid-Discovery Science. Sociological Forum. Special Issue: What's Wrong with Sociology? 9(2): 155-177.
Hargens L. 2000. Using the Literature; Reference Networks, Reference Contexts and the Social Structure of Scholarship. American Sociological Review 65 (6): 846-865.
Gans H. 1992. Review: Sociological Amnesia: The Noncumulation of Normal Social Science. Sociological Forum 7 (4): 701-710.
Collins R. Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums? // The American Journal of Sociology.1986. V. 91, №. 6. P. 1336-1355.
Turner B. Sociology as an Academic Trade: Some Reflections on Centre and Periphery in the Sociology Market // Journal of Sociology. V. 22. Р. 272-282.
Бикбов А., Гавриленко С. 2002. Российская социология: автономия под вопросом // Логос: 5-6.
Гудков Л. 2006. О положении социальных наук в России // Новое литературное обозрение. 77.
Филлипов А.Ф. 1997. О понятии «теоретическая социология». Социологический журнал. 1-2.
Райкова Д.Д. 1991. Социобиблиометрический анализ журнала «Социологические исследования» // Социологические исследования. 4.
Соколов М. 2010. Чтобы индексы сработали // Polit.ru [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://www.polit.ru/science/2009/12/10/index1.html
