Dynamic model of ideology

Research of phenomenon of ideologyin the modern scientific literature is interfaced, primarily, to questions of influence of ideologicalfactors on political and social processes. Such dependence becomes clear and obvious in light oftha role played by ideologies in modern societies. Ideology be issued during era of Modernity anddefined itself as effective and practically unique mechanism of constructing political reality. With itsadvent people have been offered the systematized methods of orientation in politics and purposefulactivity. All this period ideology were characterized by doctrinal and aspiration to utility. At the sametime, researches were carried out some aspects of ideological processes when changes were consideredas consecutive in time static conditions of ideological system. However, in modern terms it is not soeffective and potential. The modern ideological system no longer has the rigidity of the form and oftena fact (and necessity) of its existence is called by researchers into question (as, for example, in theconcept deideologization). Complication and at the same time erosion of social reality has introducedthe corrective amendments in existence sociocultural phenomena. Today we speak about transformationof ideological forms which come in the stead of dogmatic projects.The focus of this article - model of ideology as a dynamic system. Ideological forms are consideredas continuously transformed systems. The focus is on the process itself, a continuous stream ofchanges.. The dynamic system is understood by author as sequence of conditions of the spatial structurepossessing qualities and characteristics of system. Considered as dynamic system, ideology hasthe qualities and characteristics of the system as a stream of changing conditionsIn dynamic model the ideology is considered as the environment of ideological attitudes and interactions.The author proposes to use the category of «ideological field», which most accuratelyreflects the procedural of this phenomenon. Analyzing dynamics of an ideological field, the authorcomes to conclusion, that levels and measurements of ideological field in aggregate form all context ofchanges in it. While actually changes in ideological field (as the sequence of events and conditions intime) lead to different conditions of ideological field and define ideological process.

Keywords

Authors

References