The modern view of the person of the epoch of postmodern

By the end of the twentieth century, man has been saturated and overloaded qualities do not determine it, as an persona. Modern man finds the details of its in image, the properties, connection, structure, but not himself. Man, according to N.A.. Berdyaev, «falls into the surrounding of the objective world». Man dissolves in the world of mobile technology, the privet property and social exclusion. The society also operates man, calculates its statistically, distributed in organizations and subcultures that use it for different purposes. This depersonalization («Me» is the «hole of nothingness into being», J.P. Sartre) switches to «destruction» and spraying of person in dehumanization reality, which is manifested, in particular, in science and contemporary art. In this sense, illustrative transition of public attention and popular science in the end of XX - the beginning of XXI century to transper-sonal psychology, spiritual practices in the spirit of Castaneda, Aurobindo's integral yoga, etc. The General trend was the output of the individual for the scope of the spatio-temporal and causal borders. If to the twentieth century for philosophy, anthropology, education, psychology and sociology was axiom: «person - Person - Work - Subject - Freedom», at the end of the twentieth century the realization that the main thing is not the struggle for freedom and not even achieve freedom, but the experience of freedom (the ability of the soul to have freedom for himself). It may turn out like the freedom of the will and equally as the will to captivity. The freedom can turn like the direct arbitrariness, violence over the nature of society and new man. But can open the harmony of the world, the extent and depth of responsibility for it. At the first stage of a man of many faces no longer try to be a man of the public (as all others) - this is the main philosophy and social-psychological basis of this conduct. Youth informal movements was demonstrating the non-conformism of the human personality, for which the marginality is a struggle for their own «Me», and the socialization is perceived as forced and violence against the person. Homo acquires the features of the individual, which is not in need of personality structures of self. Like any Individual, life unit, independent of and in morphological and physiological aspects is not have needed in the subject of the socio-cultural life, the beginning of the individual, самораскрывающемся in the contexts of social relations and communication. Today any characteristics of a «Me» begin with the presentation of himself, as the external image for identification through clothing, signs (including, body, in the body, to the body) and a set of gadgets -, i.e., through the communication capacity of special objects and machines, designed to maintain links on the communication channels in the social space. Modern man evolves through three main types of catastrophic changes: 1) a civilization catastrophe - the collapse of basic social institutions (economic, legal, political, etc.). It is a crisis of the entire social «corporeality» of the human race; 2) cultural catastrophe - the destruction of the fundamental normative values began to spiritual, religious, moral character. The crisis of the qualities which gave man the hostel humanistic border; 3) anthropological catastrophe - negative mutations in the type of the human person. Crisis deforming the psyche, the mind. The crisis of General degradation. This article describes the modern trends, associated with the emergence and expansion in the social philosophy of transpersonal and trans-humanism directions, which will changing not only the views on the individual and society, but also will change the shape of future social Sciences.

Keywords

Authors

References