Three-dimensional modelling application for studying Stone Age assemblages | Sibirskie Istoricheskie Issledovaniia – Siberian Historical Research. 2020. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/30/12

Three-dimensional modelling application for studying Stone Age assemblages

Digital technology advancements have been widely applied in science, particularly in archaeology. The article discusses new possibilities and prospects for three-dimensional modelling using structured light scanners in order to obtain new, previously inaccessible data. As a scientific method, three-dimensional scanning has certain advantages over photogrammetry and computer tomography. It allows obtaining scale 3D models that fully match actual artifacts, by employing relatively inexpensive equipment. This, in turn, allows for accurate measurement and non-invasive model manipulation, which takes archaeological research to a new level where any data obtained and experiments carried out can be verified. In recent years, research procedures previously unavailable to archaeologists have been developed or improved, including three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis, calculation of artifact's volume/center of gravity, and drawing contours of negatives. The article presents these new possibilities through the example of three-dimensional models of artifacts from the Middle Paleolithic assemblages of the Chagyrskaya Cave (Altai Mountains).

Download file
Counter downloads: 548

Keywords

three-dimensional modelling, structured light scanners, lithic tools, bone tools, machine measurements, calculating center of mass, geometric morphometric analysis

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kolobova Ksenia A.Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Shalagina Alena V.Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciencesaliona.shalagina@yandex.ru
Chistyakov Pavel V.Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Bocharova Ekaterina N.Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciencesbocharova.e@gmail.com
Krivoshapkin Andrey I.Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Всего: 5

References

Вавулин М.В., Зайцева О.В., Пушкарев А.А. Методика и практика 3D сканирования разнотипных археологических артефактов // Сибирские исторические исследования. 2014. № 4. С. 21-37
Вавулин М.В., Зайцева О.В., Пушкарев А.А. Трехмерное сканирование и моделирование корабельных деталей коча // Виртуальная археология (эффективность методов): материалы Второй междунар. конф. Государственный Эрмитаж. СПб., 2015. С. 234239
Деревянко А.П., Маркин С.В., Колобова К.А., Чабай В.П., Рудая Н.А., Виола Б., Бужилова А.П., Медникова М.Б., Васильев С.К., Зыкин В.С., Зыкина В.С., Зажигин В.С., Вольвах А.О., Робертс Р.Г., Якобс З., Бо Ли. Междисциплинарные исследования Чагырской пещеры - стоянки среднего палеолита Алтая. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2018. DOI: 10.17746/7803-0288-9.2018
Зоткина Л.В., Ковалев В.С., Шалагина А.В. Возможности и перспективы применения трехмерной визуализации как инструмента анализа в археологии // Научная визуализация. 2018. Т. 10, № 5. С. 172-190. URL: http://sv-journal.org/2018-5/11/?lang=ru
Колобова К. А. Приемы оформления каменных орудий в палеолитических комплексах Горного Алтая. Новосибирск: ИАЭТ СО РАН, 2006
Колобова К.А., Маркин С.В., Чабай В.П. Костяные ретушеры в среднепалеолитических комплексах Чагырской пещеры // Теория и практика археологических исследований. 2016. № 4 (16). С. 35-39
Чистяков П.В., Ковалев В.С., Колобова К.А., Шалагина А.В., Кривошапкин А.И. 3D-моделирование археологических артефактов при помощи сканеров структурированного подсвета // Теория и практика археологических исследований. 2019. № 27 (3). С. 102-112. doi: 10.14258/tpai(2019)3(27).-07
Чжоу Ч. Применение технологий трехмерной реконструкции в палеолитической ареологии // Universum Humanitarium. 2017. № 1. С. 120-143
Шалагина А.В., Колобова К.А., Чистяков П.В., Кривошапкин А.И. Применение трехмерного геометрико-морфометрического анализа для изучения артефактов каменного века // Stratum plus. 2020. № 1. С. 343-358
Abouaf J. The Florentine Pieta: Can Visualization Solve the 450-Year-0ld Mystery? // IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 1999. Vol. 19 (1). P. 6-10. DOI: 10.1109/38.736462
Ahmed N., Carter M., Ferris N. Sustainable archaeology through progressive assembly 3D digitization // World Archaeology. 2014. Vol. 46 (1). P. 137-154
Archer W., Gunz P., van Niekerk K.L., Henshilwood C.S., McPherron S.P. Diachronic change within the Still Bay at Blombos Cave, South Africa // PLoS One. 2015. Vol. 10 (7). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132428
Archer W., Pop C.M., Rezei Z., Schlager S., Lin S.C., Weiss M., Dogandzic T., Desta D., McPherron S.P. A geometric morphometric relationship predicts stone flake shape and size variability // Journal of Anthropological and Archaeological Sciences. 2018. Vol. 10, is. 8. P. 1991-2003. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-017-0517-2
Arriaza M.C., Yravedra J., Dominguez-Rodrigo M., Mate-Gonzalez M.A., Garcia Vargas E., Palomeque-Gonzalez J.F., Aramendi J., Gonzalez-Aguilera D., Baquedano E. On applications of microphotogrammetry and geometric morphometrics to studies of tooth mark morphology: the modern Olduvai carnivore site (Tanzania) // Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatol-ogy, Palaeoecology. 2017. Vol. 488. P. 103-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.01.036
Beraldin J.A., Blais F., Cournoyer L., Rioux M., El-Hakim S.H., Rodella R., Bernier F., Harrison N. Digital 3D Imaging System for Rapid Response on Remote Sites // Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling. 1999. Ottawa, Canada. P. 34-43
Bretzke K., Conard N.J. Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts // The Journal of Archaeological Science. 2012. Vol. 39. P. 3741-3749. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.039
Caricola I., Zupancich A., Moscone D., Mutri G., Falcucci A., Duches R., Peresani M., Cristiani E. An integrated method for understanding the function of macro-lithic tools. Use wear, 3D and spatial analyses of an Early Upper Palaeolithic assemblage from North Eastern Italy // PLoS One. 2018. Vol. 13 (12): e0207773. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207773
Cassen S., Lescop L., Grimaud V. Robin G. Complementarity of acquisition techniques for the documentation of Neolithic engravings: lasergrammetric and photographic recording in Gavrinis passage tomb (Brittany, France) // Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014. Vol. 45. P. 126-140
Chen F., Welker F., Shen Ch.-Ch., Bailey Sh.E., Bergmann I., Davis S., Xia H., Wang H., Fischer R., Freidline S.E., Yu T.-L., Skinner M.M., Stelzer S., Dong G., Fu Q., Dong G., Wang J., Zhang D. Hublin J.-J. A late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau // Nature. 2019. Vol. 569. P. 409-412. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1139-x
Clarkson C., Hiscock P. Tapping into the past: Exploring Palaeolithic Retouching through experimentation // Lithic Technology. 2008. Vol. 33 (1). P. 5-16
Counts D.B., Averett E.W., Garstki K. A fragmented past: (re)constructing antiquity through 3D artefact modelling and customised structured light scanning at Athienou-Malloura, Cyprus // Antiquity. 2016. № 90 (349). P. 206-218. DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2015.181
Courtenay L.A., Yravedra J., Mate-Gonzalez M.A., Aramendi J., Gonzalez-Aguilera D. 3D analysis of cut marks using a new geometric morphometric methodological approach // Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 2019. Vol. 11. P. 651-665. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-017-0554-x
Delpiano D., Peresani M., Pastoors A. The contribution of 3D visual technology to the study of Palaeolithic knapped stones based on refitting // Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. 2017. Vol. 4. P. 28-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2017.02.002
Derevianko A.P., Markin S. V., Kulik N.A., Kolobova K.A. Lithic raw material exploitation in the Sibiryachikha facies, the Middle Paleolithic of Altai // Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia. 2015. № 43 (3). P. 3-16
De Reu J., Plets G., Verhoevan G., De Smedt P., Bats M., Cherrette B., De Maeyer W., De-conynck J., Herremans D., Laloo P., Van Meirvenne M., De Clercq W. Towards a three-dimensional costeffective registration of the archaeological heritage // Journal of Archaeological Science. 2013. Vol. 40. P. 1108-1121
Evgenikou V., Georgopoulos A. Investigating 3D reconstruction methods for small artifacts // Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XL-5/W4. 2015. P. 101-108. DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W4-101-2015
Freidline S.E., Gunz P., Jankovic I., Harvati K., Hublin J.J. A comprehensive morphometric analysis of the frontal and zygomatic bone of the Zuttiyeh fossil from Israel // Journal of Human Evolution. 2012. Vol. 62. P. 225-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.005
Garstki K. Virtual Representation: the Production of 3D Digital Artifacts // Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 726-750. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-016-9285-z
Georgopoulos A. Data Acquisition for the Geometric Documentation of Cultural Heritage // Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage. 2017. P. 29-73
Grosman L., Karasik A., Harush O., Smilansky U. Archaeology in Three Dimensions: Computer-Based Methods in Archaeological Research // Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies. 2014. Vol 2. P. 48-64. DOI: 10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.2.1.0048
Grosman L., Ovadia A., Bogdanovsky A. Neolithic Masks in a Digital World // Face to Face. The Oldest Masks in the World. Jerusalem: The Israel Museum, 2014. P. 54-59
Grosman L, Smikt O, Smilansky U. On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts // The Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008. Vol. 35 (12). P. 3101-3110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.011
Gunz P., Bulygina E. The Mousterian child from Teshik-Tash is a Neanderthal: A geometric morphometric study of the frontal bone // American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2012. Vol. 149 (3). P. 365-379. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22133
Heath S. Closing gaps with low-cost 3D // Visions of substance: 3D imaging in Mediterranean archaeology / eds. by B. Olson, W. Caraher. Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, 2015. P. 53-62
Herzlinger G., Goren-Inbar N., Grosman L. A new method for 3D geometric morphometric shape analysis: The case study of handaxe knapping skill // Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2017. Vol. 14. P. 163-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.05.013
Herzlinger G., Grosman L. AGMT3-D: A software for 3-D landmarks-based geometric morphometric shape analysis of archaeological artifacts // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13 (11): e0207890. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207890
Joris O. Out of the Cold. On Late Neandertal Population Dynamics in Central Europe // Notae Praehistoricae. 2002. Vol. 22. P. 33-45
Karasik A., Smilansky U. 3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: practice and theory // The Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008. Vol. 35. P. 1148-1168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.008
Karasik A., Smilansky U. Computerized morphological classification of ceramics // Journal of Archaeological Science. 2011. Vol. 38, is. 10. P. 2644-2657. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.05.023
Klein N., Belfer-Cohen A., Grosman L. Bone tools as the paraphernalia of ritual activities: a case study from Hilazon Tachtit cave // Eurasian Prehistory. 2017. № 13 (1-2). P. 91-104
Kolobova K., Shalagina A., Chabai V., Markin S., Krivoshapkin A. Signification des technologies bifaciales au Paleolithique moyen des montagnes de l'Altai. // L'antropologie. 2019a. Vol. 123, is. 2. P. 276-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.anthro.2019.06.004
Kolobova K.A., Fedorchenko A.Y., Basova N.V., Postnov A.V., Kovalev V.S., Chistyakov P.V., Molodin V.I. The Use of 3D-Modeling for Reconstructing the Appearance and Function of Non-Utilitarian Items (the Case of Anthropomorphic Figurines from Tourist-2) // Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2019b. Vol. 47, № 4. P. 66-76. DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2019.47.4.066-076
Kolobova K.A., Roberts R.G., Chabai V.P., Jacobs Z., Krajcarz M.T., Shalagina A.V., Krivoshapkin A.I., Li B., Uthmeier T., Markin S.V., Morley M.W., O'Gorman K., Rudaya N.A., Talamo S., Viola B., Derevianko A.P. Archaeological evidence for two separate dispersals of Neanderthals into southern Siberia // PNAS. 2020. Vol. 117 (6). P. 2879-2885. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1918047117
Lang N. The stone age meets the digital age: exploring the application of digital, three-dimensional technologies for the study of lithic artifacts // Berkeley Undergraduate Journal. 2013. Vol. 26, is. 3. P. 129-143
Levoy M., Pulli K., Curless B., Rusinkiewicz S., Koller D., Pereira L., Ginzton M., Anderson S., Davis J., Ginsberg J., Shade J. The digital Michelangelo project: 3D scanning of large statues // Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 2000. P. 131-144
Mathys A., Brecko J., Di Modica K., Abrams G., Bonjean D., Semal P. Agora 3D. Low cost 3D imaging: a first look for field archaeology // Natae Praehistoricae. 2013. № 33. P. 3342
McPherron S.P., Gernat T., Hublin J.J. Structured light scanning for high-resolution documentation of in situ archaeological finds // Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009. Vol. 36. P. 19-24
Morris C., Peatfield A., O'Neill B. 'Figures in 3D': Digital Perspectives on Cretan Bronze Age Figurines // Open Archaeology. 2018. № 4. P. 50-61. DOI: 10.1515/opar-2018-0003
Pastoors A., Weniger G.-C. Close range sensing for generating 3D objects in prehistoric archaeology // Proceedings of the ISPRS WG VII/5 Workshop, 18-19.11.2011 / eds. by V. Lenz-Wiedemann, G. Bareth. Cologne: Koln. 2011. P. 103-106
Porter S., Roussel M., Soressi М. A Comparison of Chatelperronian and Protoaurignacian Core Technology Using Data Derived from 3D Models // Journal of computer applications in archaeology. 2016. № 2 (1). P. 41-55. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.5334/jcaa.17
Puhar E.G., Eric M., Kavkler K., Cramer A., Celec K., Korat L., Jaclic A., Solina F. Comparison and Deformation Analysis of five 3D models of the Paleolithic wooden point from the Ljublanica River // 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (MetroArchaeo 2018). Proceedings. 2018. Cassino, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. P. 444-449
Remondino F., El-Hakim S. Image-based 3D modelling: a review // The Photogrammetric Record. 2006. № 21 (115). P. 269-291
Remondino F. Photogrammetry - basic theory // 3D recording and modelling in archaeology and cultural heritage: theory and best practices / eds. by F. Remondi, S. Campana. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2014. P. 65-73
Richardson E., Grosman L., Smilansky U., Werman M. Extracting Scar and Ridge Features from 3D-scanned Lithic Artifacts. Archaeology in the Digital Era // Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) / eds. by G. Earl, T. Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I. Romanowska, D. Wheatley. Southampton: Amsterdam University Press, 2013. P. 83-92
Riel-Salvatore J., Bae M., Clark G.A., Lindly J.M., McCartney P., Razdan A. The past meets the future: 3D modeling technology and lithic analysis at Wadi al-Hasa locality 623X // Journal of Human Evolution. 2004. Vol. 42 (3). P. A29
Sumner A.T., Riddle A. A virtual Paleolithic: assays in photogrammetric threedimensional artifact modelling // PaleoAnthropology. 2008. P. 158-169
Val A., Costamagno S., Discamps E., Chong S., Claud E., Deschamps M., Mourre V., Soulier M.C., Thiebaut C. Testing the influence of stone tool type on microscopic morphology of cut-marks: experimental approach and application to the archaeological record with a case study from the middle Palaeolithic site of Noisetier cave (Frechet-Aure, Hautes-Pyrenees, France) // Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2017. Vol. 11. P. 17-28
Valletta F., Smilanski U., Goring-morris N.A., Grosman L. On measuring the mean cutting-edge angle of lithic tools based on 3-D models - a case study from the Southern Levantine Epipaleolithic // Archaeological Anthropological Sciences. 2020. Vol. 12. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-019-00954-w
Weiss M. Stone tool analysis and context of a new late Middle Paleolithic site in western central Europe - Pouch-Terrassenpfeiler, Ldkr. Anhalt-Bitterfeld, Germany // Quartar. 2015. Vol. 62. P. 23-62
Zaidner Y., Grosman L. Middle Paleolithic sidescrapers were resharped or recycled? A view from Nesher Ramla, Israe // Quaternary International. 2015. № 361. P. 178-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.037
Zotkina L. V., Kovalev V.S. Lithic or Metal Tools: Techno-Traceological and 3D Analysis of Rock Art // Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. 2019. Vol. 13. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2019.e00099
 Three-dimensional modelling application for studying Stone Age assemblages | Sibirskie Istoricheskie Issledovaniia – Siberian Historical Research. 2020. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/30/12

Three-dimensional modelling application for studying Stone Age assemblages | Sibirskie Istoricheskie Issledovaniia – Siberian Historical Research. 2020. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/30/12

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 737