The future of anthropology: cross-, inter-, multi-, trans-, a-, or post-disciplinarity? | Sibirskie Istoricheskie Issledovaniia – Siberian Historical Research. 2016. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/14/2

The future of anthropology: cross-, inter-, multi-, trans-, a-, or post-disciplinarity?

The article discusses different forms and modes of disciplinarity and formation of disciplinary knowledge and practices. It raises the issue of multiplicity of forms of interaction between disciplinary and extra-disciplinary knowledge and practices. It analyzes some chronological paradoxes concerning modernism and postmodernism. The article focuses and draws primarily on the history of Russian anthropology and its sub-disciplines over the last fifty years.

Download file

Counter downloads: 269

Keywords

foresight, disciplinarity, sub-discipline, future, ethnology, anthropology, прогноз, дис-циплинарность, субдисциплина, будущее, этнология, антропология

Authors

Name	Organization	E-mail
Sokolovskiy Sergei V.	Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS; Ethnographic Review journal	SokolovskiSerg@mail.ru

Всего: 1

References

Levi-Strauss C. Anthropology: Its Achievements and Future // Current Anthropology. 1966 Vol. 7, no. 2. P. 124-127.

Wiessner P. The Rift between Science and Humanism What's Data Got to Do with It? // Current Anthropology. 2016. Vol. 57, suppl. 13. P. 154-166.

Пименов В.В. Удмурты: опыт компонентного анализа этноса. М., 1977

Bloom H. The Anxiety of Influence. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1997. (1st ed. 1973)

Bloom H. Yeats. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1970

Jantsch E. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation // Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities / L. Apostel et al. (eds). Paris: OECD, 1972. P. 97-121