Body and Internet: the anthropology of laboratory
The article explores the operation of an interdisciplinary laboratory which studies the issues of the body and corporeal representation on the Internet. The laboratory's work resulted in the implementation of eight individual research projects on the body and the Internet, as well as in collective reflection on the laboratory team's distance collaboration. The main focus was the form and methods of a collective research project studying bodies on the Internet by means of the Internet itself: studying the bodies of others, but also pondering one's own experience. Following the work of Latour on scientific laboratory life, the authors set the task to consider the new emerging form, drawing on empirical material: distributed interdisciplinary research projects which are seeking the status of alternative laboratories of the twenty first century. The use of the thematic field of the body and technologies of mediation of corporeal representation and bodily-sensor experiences pursues the goal of bringing the off- and on-line experience together, on the one hand, and gives the opportunity to see the distance emerging in online practices, on the other. The body acts not only as experience, here body, but also as form - individual, collective, multiple, distributed, and dynamic - while the need for technological mediation becomes a challenge to cooperation and collaboration, and, in a broader sense, to integration. New, 'connected to' the Internet reality of distributed research projects requires special skills and motivation of participants; without these interdisciplinarity stops being feasible. The increased complexity of the system, its accessibility to the participants and seeming proximity go along with the processes of atomisation - ontological, social and physical - which can be felt at the level of bodily-sensor experience and which can be overcome.
Keywords
anthropology,
laboratory,
Internet,
technologies,
body,
антропология,
лаборатория,
интернет,
технологии,
телоAuthors
Sokolova Elena K. | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences | sokolova@gmail.com |
Shevchenko Sergey Yu. | Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences | simurg87@list.ru |
Shirokov Aleksandr A. | National Research University 'Higher School of Economics' | needeeds@gmail.com |
Всего: 3
References
Woolgar S. The Turn to Technology in Social Studies of Science // Science, Technology & Human Values. 1991. № 1. P. 20-50
Why We Post. n.d. URL: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/why-we-post
Venturini T. Diving in Magma: How to explore controversies with Actor-Network // Public Understanding of Science. 2010. № 3. P. 258-273
Thagard P. Being interdisciplinary: Trading zones in cognitive science // Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science / Eds. by S.J. Derry, C.D. Schunn, M.A. Gernsbacher. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005. P. 317-339
Rheingold H. Virtual Reality: The Revolutionary Technology of Computer-Generated Artificial Worlds - and How It Promises to Transform Society. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1992
Rheingold H. Tools for Thought: The History and Future of Mind-Expanding Technology. Revised edition. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2000 (1985)
Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Revised edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000 (1993)
Rheingold H. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Reprint edition. Cambridge: Basic Books, 2003 (2002)
Rheingold H. Cooperation // Howard Rheingold. n.d. URL: http://rheingold.com/cooperation-notes
Rheingold H. Net Smart: How to Thrive Online. Reprint edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2014
Pentland A. The New Science of Building Great Teams // Harvard Business Review. 2012. URL: https://hbr.org/2012/04/the-new-science-of-building-great-teams
Pentland A. Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread-The Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press, 2014
Lynch M. Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul, 1985
Learning objectives // Social Media Classroom. n.d. URL: http://socialmediaclassroom.com/ host/cooperation6/lockedwiki/learning-objectives
Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986
Latour B. Give me a laboratory and I will move the world // Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science / Eds. by K. Knorr-Cetina, M. Mulkay. London: SAGE Publications, 1983. P. 141-170
Haraway D. Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s // Socialist review. 1985. № 80. P. 55-80
Knorr-Cetina K. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. London: Pergamon Press, 1981
Gieryn T.F. City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies // Social Studies of Science. 2006. № 1. P. 5-38
Collins H., Evans R., Gorman M. Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2007. Vol. 38, № 3. Р. 686-697
ASSA. n.d. URL: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/assa/
Bloor D. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge, 1976
Соколовский С.В. Три тела // Клуб любителей интернета и общества. Youtube. 2018. URL: https://youtu.be/NGXJLBHQP-E
About this course: Expect participative and collaborative learning // Social Media Classroom. n.d. URL: http://socialmediaclassroom.com/host/cooperation6/lockedwiki/main-page
Сироткина И.Е. Тело до и после цифры // Клуб любителей интернета и общества. Youtube. 2018. URL: https://youtu.be/v9pQwus6Y34
Поправко И.Г., Чалаков И.Х. Следуя за практиками ученых в комплексных экологических исследованиях: осмысление опыта Томских летних школ по антропологии науки // Сибирские исторические исследования. 2017. № 4. C. 78-93. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/18/6
Поппер К.Р. Эволюционная эпистемология // Эволюционная эпистемология и логика социальных наук: Карл Поппер и его критики. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2000. С. 57-74
Мертон Р. Исследования по социологии науки // Мертон Р. Социальная теория и социальная структура. М.: АСТ, Хранитель, 2006. С. 750-865
Куайн У. С точки зрения логики. М.: Канон+, 2010
Макиенко О.В. От STS к VSTS: проблема методологии визуальных исследований лабораторных практик и потенциал camera ethnography // Сибирские исторические исследования. 2017. № 4. C. 94-103. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/18/7
Контарева А.Ю. Как собрать «экспериментальную систему»: коммуникация и организация современной российской научной лаборатории // Социология науки и технологий. 2015. Т. 2. С. 33-44
Дорожкин А.М. Проблемы построения и типологии зон обмена // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2017. № 4. С. 20-29. DOI: 10.5840/eps201754462
Болтански Л., Тевено Л. Критика и обоснование справедливости: очерки социологии градов. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2013
Артюшина А.В. Сетевые взаимодействия в условиях конкуренции за ресурсы на примере молекулярно-биологических лабораторий в России и США: дис. ... канд. со-циол. наук. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2014