Age distribution of deaths in Russia in the 17th to the 19th centuries: misleading paleodemography
The issue of reliability of paleodemographic characteristics is hardly discussed in modern Russian anthropology, although its relevance is beyond doubt as the analysis of age distribution of deaths - based on anthropological data from excavations of city cemeteries of the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries - confirms. For comparative analysis, the present study uses official demographic statistics for the second half of the nineteenth century. This analysis revealed that the shape of age distribution of skeletal samples has hardly changed over the period in question. The distribution features a reduced average age of death for adults, a small number of individuals of up to 5 and over 50 years of age, as well as an increased proportion of individuals aged between 20 and 50. In addition, some systematic differences can be seen between the age-at-death distributions of skeletal samples: the proportion of young women is significantly higher, and that of elderly women is lower, compared to the distributions for men and women recorded for the nineteenth century. The discrepancies in the data on the two groups of sources can be accounted for by some independent factors. These include unrepresentative archaeological samples used, differences in the archaeological preservation of skeletons of different age groups, and systematic errors in age estimation. Correcting the age-at-death distribution based on independent anthropological data makes it possible to bring the distribution of skeletal samples closer to the historically recorded one.
Keywords
палеодемография,
историческая демография,
физическая антропология,
методы установления возраста,
Европейская Россия,
Новое время,
paleodemography,
historical demography,
physical anthropology,
age estimation methods,
European Russia,
the modern periodAuthors
| Shirokobokov Ivan Grigorievich | Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) | ivansmith@bk.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Бессер К., Баллод К. Смертность, возрастной состав и долговечность православного населения обоего пола в России за 1851-1890 годы. СПб.: Типография Императорской академии наук, 1897
Боруцкая С.Б., Васильев С.В. Палеодемографический анализ населения Твери XVII-XIX вв. // Тверской археологический сборник. Тверь: Триада, 2015. Сер. 10. Т. 2. С. 318-325
Газимзянов И.Р., Макарова Е.М. К антропологической экспертизе черепов из храма «Во имя святой великомученицы Параскевы Пятницы» // Актуальные вопросы археологии Поволжья. К 65-летию студенческого научного археологического кружка Казанского университета. Казань: ЯЗ, 2012. С. 166-179
Гончарова Н.Н. Описание антропологического материала из раскопок у церкви Вознесения Господня в 2004 году в Звенигороде // Охранные исследования церкви Вознесения Господня на Нижнем посаде Звенигорода. Труды Подмосковной экспедиции Института археологии РАН. М.: ИА РАН, 2005. Т. 3. С. 99-118
Миронов Б.Н. Новая историческая демография имперской России (Часть 2): аналитический обзор современной литературы // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. 2007. Сер. 2. Вып. 1. С. 100-126
Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона. СПб., 1890-1907. 86 т. URL: https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/ЭСБЕ/Россия/Население/Статистика_населения (дата обращения: 23.04.2019)
Bello S.M., Thomann A., Signoli M., Dutour O., Andrews P. Age and sex bias in the reconstruction of past population structures // American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2006. Vol. 129. P. 24-38
Bocquet-Appel J.P., Masset C. Paleodemography: expectancy and false hope // American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1996. Vol. 99. P. 571-583
Caussinus H., Courgeau D. Estimating age without measuring it: a new method in paleodemography // Population. 2010. Vol. 65. P. 117-144
Jackes M. Representativeness and bias in archaeological skeletal samples // Social Bioarchae-ology. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, 2011. P. 107-146
Lamphear K.M. Testing the value of skeletal samples in demographic research: a comparison with vital registration samples // International Journal of Anthropology. 1989. Vol. 4. P. 185-193
Lovejoy C.O., Meindl R.S., Mensforth R.P., Barton T.J. Multifactorial determination of skeletal age at death: a method and blind tests of its accuracy // American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1985. Vol. 68 (1). P. 1-14
Masset C. Erreurs systematiques dans la determination de l'age par les sutures craniennes // Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'anthropologie de Paris, XII° Serie. 1971. T. 7, fascicule 1. P. 85-105
Milner G.R., Wood J.W., Boldsen J.L. Problems, progress and potential // Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, 2018. P. 593-633
Piontek J. Paleodemography and taphonomy // Archaeologia Polona. 2001. Vol. 39. P. 55-74
Sattenspiel L., Harpending H. Stable population and skeletal age // American Antiquity. 1983. Vol. 48. P. 489-498
Saunders S.R., Fitzgerald C., Rogers T., Dudar C., McKillop H. A test of several methods of skeletal age estimation using a documented archaeological sample // Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal. 1992. Vol. 25, is. 2. P. 97-118
Seguy I., Buchet L. Handbook of palaeodemography. INED Population Studies. Springer, Cham, 2013. Vol. 2
Walker P.L., Johnson J.R., Lambert P.M. Age and sex biases in the preservation of human skeletal remains // American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1988. Vol. 76 (1). P. 183-188
