Empathy: Behavioral Dynamics During the Global Stress of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Russia
Objective of the study: analysis of the dynamics of empathic behavior, measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, in Russia during three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis of the relationships between empathy, anxiety and aggression during the pandemic. Research of human behavior during a pandemic contributes to understanding the best ways to adapt to global stress. Empathy can have both positive (development of mutual assistance and cooperation during COVID-19) and negative consequences (risk factor for depression and increased anxiety) for mental health. The study examined the dynamics of empathy during three waves of the pandemic in Russia, as well as the relationship between empathy, anxiety and aggression. The presence and nature of relationships were tested through multivariate analysis of covariance and regression analysis. The total sample was 7,174 people and was collected among students from several regions of Russia. Russian-language versions of questionnaires for empathy by Interpersonal Reactivity Index, for aggressive behavior by Buss-Perry, and for anxiety Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). A large sample from different regions of Russia during three waves of the COVID -19 pandemic shows the dynamics of empathic behavior: the minimum level of empathy was observed during the first wave, then reached its maximum by the second phase, and began to decline by the third. Significant positive correlations of all empathy scales with anxiety were also found - more empathic people had higher selfratings of stress. Associations with aggression are more complex depending on the empathy scale and the aggression scale. Since the beginning of the pandemic, there has been an increase in empathy followed by a decrease. There is a relationship between empathy scales, anxiety levels and aggression scales. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Keywords
COVID-19,
empathy,
anxiety,
stress,
pandemicAuthors
| Burkova Valentina N. | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences | burkovav@gmail.com |
| Butovskaya Marina L. | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences; National Research University “Higher School of Economics” | |
| Ermakov Alexey M. | Don State Technical University | |
| Galimkhanov Azat B. | Ufa University of Science and Technology | |
| Emelyanov Alexey V. | Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin | |
| Zinurova Raushaniia I. | Kazan National Research Technological University | |
| Kalinichenko Olga V. | Far Eastern Federal University | |
| Rymarenko Natalya V. | V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University | |
| Simakov Nikolay Yu. | Moscow State Institute of International Relations | |
| Spodina Victoriya I. | Ob-Ugric Institute of Applied Researches and Development | |
Всего: 10
References
Будаговская Н.А., Дубровская С.В., Карягина Т.Д. Адаптация многофакторного опросника эмпатии М. Дэвиса // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2013. № 1. С. 202-227.
Буркова В.Н., Бутовская М.Л. Коронафобия, инфодемия и фейки во время COVID-19 // Сибирские исторические исследования. 2023. № 2. С. 55-75. doi: 10.17223/2312461X/40/3.
Буркова В.Н., Бутовская М.Л., Симаков Н.Ю. Эмпатия и взаимопомощь до и во время COVID-19 (данные по московским студентам) // Вопросы психологии. 2022. Т. 68, № 1. С. 28-40.
Буркова В.Н., Бутовская М.Л., Зинурова Р.И. Агрессия и тревожность до и во время COVID-19 (на основе опроса московских и казанских студентов) // Вопросы психологии. 2021. Т. 67, № 6. C. 65-77.
Феденок Ю.Н., Буркова В.Н. Социальное дистанцирование как альтруизм в условиях пандемии коронавируса: кросс-культурное исследование // Сибирские исторические исследования. 2020. № 2. С. 6-40. doi: 10.17223/2312461X28/1.
Barello S., Graffigna G. Caring for health professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic emergency: toward an “epidemic of empathy” in healthcare // Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11, № 1431.
Baiano C., Zappullo I., The LabNPEE Group, Conson M. Tendency to Worry and Fear of Mental Health during Italy's COVID-19 Lockdown // Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020. Vol. 17, № 5928.
Baiano C., Raimo G., Zappullo I., Marra M., Cecere R., Trojano L., Conson, M. Empathy through the pandemic: changes of different emphatic dimensions during the COVID-19 outbreak // International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022. Vol. 19 (4), № 2435.
Burkova V.N., Butovskaya M.L., Randall A.K. et al. Predictors of Anxiety in the COVID-19 Pandemic from a Global Perspective: Data from 23 Countries // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13, № 4017. doi: 10.3390/su13074017.
Burkova V.N., Butovskaya M.L., Randall A.K. et al. Factors associated with highest symptoms of anxiety during COVID-19: Cross-Cultural Study of 23 Countries // Frontier in Psychology. 2023. Vol. 13, № 805586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.8055.
Buss A.H., Perry M. The Aggression Questionnaire // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992. Vol. 63. P. 452-459.
Butovskaya M.L., Burkova V.N., Randall A.K. et al. Cross-cultural perspectives on the role of empathy during COVID-19’s first wave // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13 (13), № 7431. doi: 10.3390/su13137431.
Cerami C., Santi G.C., Galandra C. et al. Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: are we ready for the psychosocial and the economic crisis? Baseline findings from the PsyCovid study // Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020. Vol. 11, № 556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00556.
Davis M.H. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy // JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980. Vol. 10. P. 85.
Depoux A., Martin S., Karafillakis E., Preet R., Wilder-Smith A., Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak // Journal of travel medicine. 2020. Vol. 27 (3). № taaa031.
Di Tella M., Miti F., Ardito R.B., Adenzato M. Social cognition and sex: Are men and women really different? // Pers. Individ. Differ. 2020. Vol. 162, № 110045.
Guadagni V., Umilta ’ A., Iaria G. Sleep quality, empathy, and mood during the isolation period of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Canadian population: Females and women suffered the most // Front. Glob. Women’s Health. 2020. Vol. 1, № 585938. P. 1-10.
Healey M.L., Grossman M. Cognitive and affective perspective-taking: evidence for shared and dissociable anatomical substrates // Frontiers in neurology. 2018. Vol. 9, № 491.
Kowal M., Coll-Martin T., Ikizer G. et al. Who is the most stressed during the COVID-19 pandemic? Data from 26 countries and areas // Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 2020. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 946-966. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12234.
Micillo L., Rioux P.A., Mendoza E. et al. Time perspective predicts levels of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-cultural study // PLoS One. 2022. Vol. 17 (9), № e0269396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269396.
Moret-Tatay C., Murphy M. Anxiety, resilience and local conditions: A cross-cultural investigation in the time of covid-19 // International Journal of Psychology. 2022. Vol. 57, № 1. P. 161-170. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12822.
Morstead T. et al. Adherence to recommended preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of empathy and perceived health threat // Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2022. Vol. 56, № 4. Р. 381-392.
Pfattheicher S., Nockur L., Bohm R., Sassenrath C., Petersen M.B. The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic // Psychological Science. 2020. Vol. 31 (11). Р. 1363-1373.
Preston S.D., de Waal F.B.M. Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2001. Vol. 25, № 1. Р. 1-20.
Qin X., Yang F., Jiang Z., Zhong B. Empathy not quarantined: social support via social media helps maintain empathy during the COVID-19 pandemic // Social Media+ Society. 2022. Vol. 8 (1), № 20563051221086234.
Rifkin J. The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a World in Crisis. New York : Penguin, 2009.
Saladino V., Algeri D., Auriemma V. The psychological and social impact of Covid-19: new perspectives of well-being // Frontiers in psychology. 2020. Vol. 11, № 2550.
Sassenrath C., Diefenbacher S., Siegel A., Keller J. A person-oriented approach to hand hygiene behaviour: Emotional empathy fosters hand hygiene practice // Psychology and Health. 2016. Vol. 31. Р. 205-227.
Schreiter S., Pijnenborg G.H., Aan Het Rot M. Empathy in adults with clinical or subclinical depressive symptoms // Journal of Affective Disorder. 2013. Vol. 150. P. 1-16.
Sokic K., Qureshi F.H., Khawaja S. Aggression, empathy, and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic among students in private higher education // European Journal of Education Studies. 2021. Vol. 8, № 12.
Spitzer R.L., Kroenke K., Williams J.B. W., Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder // Arch.Int. Med. 2006. Vol. 166, № 10. P. 1092-1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
Todorovic K., O ’Leary E., Ward K.P., Devarasetty P.P., Lee S.J., Knox M., Andari E. Prevalence, increase and predictors of family violence during the COVID-19 pandemic, using modern machine learning approaches // Frontiers in psychiatry. 2022. Vol. 13, № 883294.
Yim M.C., Park H.S. The Effects of Corporate Elitism and Groupthink on Organizational Empathy in Crisis Situations // Public Relations Review. 2021. Vol. 47 (1), № 101985.
