Development of English pronunciation skills: Use of digital tools and artificial intelligence for non-linguistic majors
The authors focus on the integration of digital tools and artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching English pronunciation to non-linguistic majors, addressing critical gaps in current pedagogical approaches. The research identifies key challenges in pronunciation acquisition, including grapheme-phoneme mismatches between English and Russian, lack of speaking practice, and insufficient classroom time dedicated to phonetic training (averaging 72 classroom hours in undergraduate curriculum). Through mixed-methods research conducted at Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia in Saint Petersburg and Synergy University in Moscow, the study evaluates the effectiveness of AI-powered tools compared to traditional methods, employing pre- and post-testing, surveys, and speech analysis to measure progress in articulation accuracy, intonation, and phonological awareness. The experimental design incorporated three methodological phases: diagnostic assessment of students' baseline pronunciation skills using speech recognition software; implementation of a 12-week intervention combining AI tools (text-to-speech platforms and interactive chatbots) with classroom instruction across 8 academic majors; evaluation of learning outcomes through blinded expert ratings and student self-assessments. Results demonstrate a 28% improvement in pronunciation accuracy among experimental groups using AI scaffolding versus 11% in control groups, with particular efficacy observed for problematic phonemes like /0/ and /5/. However, the study reveals significant barriers: 32.1% of students reported technological difficulties, 43.6% emphasized the need for human emotional connection, and 16% expressed data privacy concerns; that is, highlighting the necessity for balanced implementation frameworks. The paper provides concrete methodological recommendations for educators: structured integration of tools for speech recording within a flipped classroom model; development of AI-mediated pronunciation clinics for individualized feedback; and curriculum designs that combine chatbot dialogues with live communicative practice. Comparative analysis shows that hybrid approaches yield 19% better retention than purely digital or traditional methods. The conclusion outlines three key implementation principles: AI as supplement rather than replacement for human instruction; mandatory digital literacy training for both students and faculty and ethical protocols for educational AI use. These findings contribute to evolving paradigms in L2 phonetics instruction while proposing actionable solutions for higher education institutions seeking to optimize limited classroom hours through technological augmentation. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
artificial intelligence,
digital tools,
English language teaching,
non-linguistic majors,
pronunciation skillsAuthors
| Agafonova Lidia I. | Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia | liagafonova@herzen.spb.ru |
| Penkov Boris V. | Synergy University | penkovlinguistics@gmail.com |
Всего: 2
References
Tsenov M.Y., Bakracheva M.A. Attitudes towards artificial intelligence in professional and personal life // Education and Science Journal. 2025. Vol. 27, № 2. P. 159-174. doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2025-2-159-174.
Guo Y., Wang Y. Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence application on EFL students' academic engagement and emotional experiences: A mixed-methods study // European Journal of Education. 2025. Vol. 60, Is. 1. Art. No. e12812. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12812.
Sardegna V.G. The effects of learner and instructional variables on English pronunciation learning: What teachers need to know // English Pronunciation Teaching: Theory, Practice and Research Findings. Series: Second Language Acquisition / ed. by V.G. Sardegna, A. Jarosz. Bristol, UK; Jackson, TN, USA : Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications, 2023. P. 21-33. doi: 10.2307/jj.22679732.9.
Mubarok M.Z., Aziezal F. AI and non-AI tools in teaching English pronunciation to EFL learners // Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies. 2024. Vol. 4 (5). P. 22-33. doi: 10.53103/cjlls.v4i5.178.
Федоров И.Е., Прохорова А.А., Лазарева А.С. Аналитический подход к типологии проблем обучения иностранному языку студентов аграрного вуза // Язык и культура. 2025. № 69. С. 247-274. doi: 10.17223/19996195/69/12.
Едалов Д.О. Сравнение условий организации совместной деятельности в очном и цифровом пространстве // Психолого-педагогические исследования. 2024. Т. 16, № 2. С. 43-59. doi: 10.17759/psyedu.2024160203.
Даггэн С. Искусственный интеллект в образовании: изменение темпов обучения. Аналитическая записка ИИТО ЮНЕСКО. М. : Институт ЮНЕСКО по информационным технологиям в образовании, 2020. 44 с.
ChatGPT. OpenAI, 2025. URL: https://openai.com/chatgpt.
Ивахненко Е.Н., Никольский В.С. ChatGPT в высшем образовании и науке: угроза или ценный ресурс? // Высшее образование в России. 2023. Т. 32, № 4. С. 9-22. doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-9-22.
DeepSeek. Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 2025. URL: https://www.deepseek.com.
Voln J. Perceptual impact of foreign-accented speech and Alice Henderson // The Pronunciation of English by Speakers of Other Languages / ed. by J. Voln, R. Skarnitzl. Cambridge : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018. P. 73-94. doi: 10.2307/jj.22679732.9.
Вишневская Е.М. Структура и содержание англоязычной фонетической компетенции студентов // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2013. № 2. C. 37-42.
Murphy J.M., Baker A.A. History of ESL pronunciation teaching // The Handbook of English Pronunciation (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). 1st ed. / ed. by M. Reed, J.M. Levis. Wiley-Blackwell, 2019. P. 36-65.
Исаева Н.А., Овчинникова А.В., Тимашова А.С. Новые способы организации образовательного пространства урока: цифровой краеведческий сторителлинг // Русский язык в школе. 2024. Т. 85, № 3. С. 17-25. doi: 10.30515/0131-6141-2024-85-3-17-25.
Babbel. Berlin, Germany; New York : Babbel GmbH, 2025. URL: https://www.babbel.com.
Rosetta Stone. L. : Rosetta Stone GmbH, 2025. URL: https://www.rosettastone.com.
Mango. Mango Languages, 2025. URL: https://mangolanguages.com.
Duolingo. Pittsburgh, PA, 2025. URL: https://www.duolingo.com.
Chuyen N.T.H., Linh H.T., Phuc N.T.H., Phuong D.T.N. enhancing English pronunciation for high school students through Duolingo application // International Journal of All Research Writings. 2021. Vol. 3, Iss. 1. P. 46-54.
Elsa Speak. Los Gatos, CA: ELSA, 2025. URL: https://elsaspeak.com.
Сысоев П.В., Ивченко М.И. Формирование иноязычных фонетических навыков речи обучающихся на основе инструментов искусственного интеллекта // Перспективы науки и образования. 2025. № 2. С. 600-614. doi: 10.32744/pse.2025.2.38.
Learn English Sounds Right. Cambridge, UK, 2025. URL: https://www.englishclub.com/pronunciation.
Oratlas. 2025. URL: https://www.oratlas.com.
Forvo. Forvo Media SL. San Sebastian, Spain, 2025. URL: https://forvo.com.
Youglish. 2025. URL: https://youglish.com.
Audacity. 2025. URL: https://www.audacityteam.org.
Adobe Express. 2025. URL: https://new.express.adobe.com.
Voki. New York : Oddcast Inc, 2025. URL: https://www.voki.com.
Slide Model. 2025. URL: https://slidemodel.com.
Prastyo Y.D., Dharmawan Y.Y., Amelia S.F. Student’s perceptions on the implementation of Youglish in learning English pronunciation at english department // Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan. 2022. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 42-54.
Speechify. Speechify Inc., 2025. URL: https://www.speechify.com.
Pictello. Amsterdam : AssistiveWare B.V., 2025. URL: https://www.assistiveware.com/products/pictello.
Филипова А.Г., Малахова В.Р. Образовательный видеоблогинг: поиски смыслов и концептуализация понятий // Образование и саморазвитие. 2024. Т. 19, № 4. С. 226-241. doi: 10.26907/esd.19.4.17.