On resolution of defense attorneys' requests and complaints of citizens by state expert institutions | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2022. № 19. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/19/8

On resolution of defense attorneys' requests and complaints of citizens by state expert institutions

The article analyses the practice of resolving defense attorneys' requests and complaints of citizens by state expert institutions. The author has assessed whether it is eligible to submit such requests and complaints to expert institutions and whether they are correctly resolved by expert institutions in terms of the current criminal procedure law. The current legislation ensures that defense attorneys may make inquires to various state authorities, local governments, public associations, and other organizations, including state expert institutions. However, some of the defense attorneys' requests received by expert institutions are not legitimate and the attorneys should be denied the requested information. In addition to attorney's requests, expert institutions receives complaints from suspects and accused persons, drawn up with the help of defense attorneys, who must understand that the addressee is not entitled to consider these appeals. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to this negative trend that has emerged in recent years.

Download file
Counter downloads: 8

Keywords

complaint, defense attorney's request, expert opinion, state expert institution, assessment of evidence

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Nadonenko Olga N.Yekaterinburg Branch of Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federationuc.ural@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Макаров С. Как адвокату сделать запрос надежным инструментом защиты. URL: https://fparf.ru/polemic/opinions/kak-advokatu-sdelat-zapros-nadezhnym-instrumentom-zashchity/(дата обращения: 25.01.2022).
Дорошева А.А. Некоторые проблемы участия адвоката-защитника по уголовным делам // Судебная власть и уголовный процесс. 2018. № 2. С. 285-289.
Макаров С. Проблемы направления адвокатского запроса. URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/problemy-napravleniya-advokatskogo-zaprosa/(дата обращения: 25.01.2022).
Трубецкой Н. Проблемы адвокатского запроса в уголовном судопроизводстве. URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/ problemy-advokatskogo-zaprosa-v-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve/(дата обращения: 25.01.2022).
Россинский С.Б. Уголовный процесс : учебник. М. : Эксмо, 2009. 735 с.
Большой энциклопедический словарь. 2000. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc3p/284138 (дата обращения: 25.01.2022).
Толковый словарь Д.Н. Ушакова. 1935-1940. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ushakov/1047002 (дата обращения: 25.01.2022).
Зинин М.А. Заключение специалиста: сущность, содержание и форма // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). 2016. № 8. С. 32-37.
Уголовный процесс : учебник / А.В. Смирнов, К.Б. Калиновский ; под общ.ред. проф. А.В. Смирнова. 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. М. : КноРус, 2008. 704 с.
Белкин Р.С. Теория доказывания в уголовном судопроизводстве. М. : Норма, 2005. 527 с.
Судебная экспертиза: типичные ошибки / под ред. Е.Р. Россинской. М. : Проспект, 2016. 544 с.
 On resolution of defense attorneys' requests and complaints of citizens by state expert institutions | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2022. № 19. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/19/8

On resolution of defense attorneys' requests and complaints of citizens by state expert institutions | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2022. № 19. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/19/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 224