Exemption from criminal liability with payment of judicial penalty: problems and prospects of the procedural institution application | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2018. № 11. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/11/19

Exemption from criminal liability with payment of judicial penalty: problems and prospects of the procedural institution application

The procedure for payment of a judicial penalty by agreement could be effective in the Russian Federation if the proposal to pay a fine to the court was made, as, for example, in France, by a prosecutor. In this case it would be appropriate to impose an obligation on the prosecutor to examine the petitions of the victim and the accused in the pre-trial proceedings, and to decide on their support or rejection. A procedure is also possible in which the prosecutor, at the end of the investigation, in order to avoid prosecution, would suggest that the accused who committed a minor act pay a certain fine or perform any positive actions (public works, etc.), as it is done in Belgium, the Netherlands and some other states. If the accused accepts the proposal of the prosecutor, the criminal case would not have come to court at all; if the accused refuses, the criminal case would have to be examined in court in compliance with all procedural guarantees.

Download file
Counter downloads: 140

Keywords

уголовный процесс, суд, прокурор, прекращение уголовного дела, прекращение уголовного преследования, criminal procedure, court, prosecutor, termination of criminal case, termination of criminal prosecution

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Piyuk Aleksey V.Megion City Courtcrim.just@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Свиридов М.К. Установление истины на предварительном расследовании и в судебном разбирательстве // Правовые пробле мы укрепления российской государственности : сб. ст. Ч. 51 / отв. ред. М.К. Свиридов, Ю.К. Якимович. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2011. С. 7-8.
Гуценко К. Ф., Головко Л.В., Филимонов Б.А. Уголовный процесс западных государств. М. : Зерцало-М, 2002. 480 с.
Калугин А.Г., МонидМ.В. Компромисс в уголовном судопроизводстве. Красноярск : СибЮИ МВД РФ, 2008. 120 с.
Михайловский И.В. К вопросу об упрощении суммарного уголовного процесса // Вестник права. 1903. Кн. 2-3. С. 1-39.
Пусторослев П.П. Отзыв о сочинении И.В. Михайловского «К вопросу об упрощении суммарного уголовного процесса» // Ученые записки Императорского Юрьевского университета. Юрьев : Тип. К. Матиссена, 1903. С. 1-34.
Раскин А. Страна сегодня. Судопроизводство Израиля. 2004-2016. URL: http://www.strana.co.il/1233996 (дата обращения: 19.09.2017).
Воронин О.В. Прокурорский надзор в Российской Федерации : учеб. пособие. Томск : Изд-во НТЛ, 2008. 428 с.
 Exemption from criminal liability with payment of judicial penalty: problems and prospects of the procedural institution application | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2018. № 11. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/11/19

Exemption from criminal liability with payment of judicial penalty: problems and prospects of the procedural institution application | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2018. № 11. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/11/19

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1561