New Industrialization: Phases, Dominants and Patterns | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2020. № 52. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/52/18

New Industrialization: Phases, Dominants and Patterns

The article attempts to identify the key parameters of new industrialization, scientifically substantiate the place of such components as digitalization, cooperation, and the role of the public sector in economic transformation. An attempt is made to formulate the main theses of the concept of phase, which makes it possible to establish not only the divisibility of the process of new industrialization, but also to identify the main economic characteristics in the form of dominants, determinants and patterns for each phase of neoindustrial transformations. It is noted that, in most of the existing studies, new industrialization itself acts as one of the phases of economic development, along with such phases as industrialization, deindustrialization and reindustrialization. Each of these phases has a corresponding time interval and corresponding key parameters that allow identifying the main processes and results of passing the phase. Moreover, each of these phases also obeys the laws of phase behavior and, accordingly, can be divided into certain phases. The article considers new industrialization as a fourphase process. In view of the fact that new industrialization is a process that includes both the goals of modernization and the goals of innovative development, and thus assumes that there is a lag behind the basic technological development of the potential of the industry, the first phase of the process is the initiation of new industrialization, which implies a control effect on the process. Increasing the productivity of capital and labor in the system of new industrialization presupposes the active use of new technologies and knowledge, the increasing of efficiency through the widespread involvement of technological innovations in the economic circulation, as well as structural changes and the use of new combinations of resources. Digitalization at the initial stage of new industrialization can be viewed as a digital transformation, which leads to the formation of a new technological basis for production. At the stage of the full deployment of new industrialization, digitalization is a determinant that ensures the effective development of neoindustrial transformations. At the initial stage of new industrialization, the form of ownership of industrial resources is considered as a key dominant. The author concludes that key parameters such as digitalization, cooperation and the form of ownership at various phases of new industrialization can act as both determining and influencing factors, and under certain conditions become process patterns.

Download file
Counter downloads: 81

Keywords

new industrialization, the concept of phasing, dominants, form of ownership, determinants, cooperation, patterns, digitalization

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Razvadovskaya Yuliya V.Southern Federal Universityyuliyaraz@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Бодрунов С. Новое индустриальное общество второго поколения: человек, производство, развитие // Общество и экономика. 2016. № 9.
Отчет ЮНИДО «Отчет о промышленном развитии 2020. Индустриализация в цифровую эпоху. Обзор». 2020.
Геологический словарь : в 2 т. / под ред. К.Н. Паффенгольца и др. М. : Недра, 1978.
Suarez F.F., Grodal S., Gotsopoulos A. Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry // Strategic Management Journal. March 2015. Vol. 36, is. 3, 1. P. 437-448.
Emre Unal. An institutional approach and input-output analysis for explaining the transformation of the Turkish economy // Journal of Economic Structures. 2018. Vol. 7. Article number: 3.
Варавва М.Ю. Контуры построения национальной модели экономики с научноинновационной доминантой // Вопросы инновационной экономики. 2016. Т. 6, № 1. С. 9-32.
Крысин 1998. Лекс. Брокг. : детерминант; СИС 1949.
Athanassios Petralias & Prodromos Prodromidis Price discovery under crisis: uncovering the determinant factors of prices using efficient Bayesian model selection methods // Empirical Economics. 2015. Vol. 49. Р. 859-879.
Шестакова К.В. Детерминанты эффективности промышленной политики: эмпирический анализ // Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Экономика. 2018. № 1. С. 85-92.
Малявина И.Ю. Детерминанты конкурентоспособности и их использование в экономике России // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. 2010. № 3-2. С. 538-543.
Wei Chen, Huilin Xu, Lifen Jia, Ying Gao. Corrected Proof What are Corrected Proof articles? Machine learning model for Bitcoin exchange rate prediction using economic and technology determinants // International Journal of Forecasting. Available online 3 April 2020, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.02.008
Qiuqin He, Bing X. Determinants of economic growth: A varying-coefficient path identification approach nternational Economics // Journal of Business Research. 2019. Vol. 101. P. 811-818.
Матвеева Л.Г., Чернова О.А. Российское импортозамещение в условиях «Новой нормальности» // TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2016. Т. 14, № 2. С. 127-138.
Артур У.Б. Теория сложности в экономической науке: иные основы экономического мышления// TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2015. Т. 13, № 2. С. 15-37.
Плетнев Д.А., Николаева Е.В. Паттерны института содействия в современных российских корпорациях // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2016. № 2 (384). С. 151-161.
Nelson R.R. Human Behavior and Cognition in Evolutionary Economics // Biol Theory. 2011. № 6. Р. 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0036-4
Вольчик В.В. Институциональные изменения, коллективные действия и социальные ценности // Научные труды Донецкого национального технического университета. Серия экономическая. 2014. № 1. С. 80-89.
Румянцев А.М. Политическая экономия. М. : Советская энциклопедия, 1975. Т. 2: Инди..Мюраль. 560 с.
Шумпетер Й.А. Теория экономического развития. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М. : Эксмо, 2008. 864 с.
Пороховский А.А. Цифровизация и производительность труда США & Канада: экономика, политика, культура // USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture. 2019. № 49 (8). Р. 5-24.
Корнилов М., Корнилов А. Цифровая экономика: парадоксы и перспективы // Общество и экономика. 2019. № 8.
 New Industrialization: Phases, Dominants and Patterns | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2020. № 52. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/52/18

New Industrialization: Phases, Dominants and Patterns | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2020. № 52. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/52/18

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 601